What this quiz covers
This quiz focuses on Estimating Limit Values From Graphs, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Calculus BC.
Based on the graph of function f(x), what is limx→2f(x)? The graph shows that as x approaches 2 from both sides, the function values approach 5, even though there is a hole at the point (2,5) and the function is actually defined as f(2)=3.
AP Calculus BC Quiz
Practice Estimating Limit Values From Graphs in AP Calculus BC with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
This quiz focuses on Estimating Limit Values From Graphs, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Calculus BC.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
Based on the graph of function f(x), what is limx→2f(x)? The graph shows that as x approaches 2 from both sides, the function values approach 5, even though there is a hole at the point (2,5) and the function is actually defined as f(2)=3.
Explanation: The correct answer is A. The limit of a function as x approaches a value depends only on the behavior of the function near that point, not the actual function value at that point. From the graph, as x approaches 2 from both the left and right sides, the y-values approach 5. The fact that there's a hole at (2,5) and f(2) = 3 doesn't affect the limit value.
From the graph of s(x), as x approaches 1 from the left, s(x) approaches -3. As x approaches 1 from the right, s(x) decreases without bound toward negative infinity. What is limx→1+s(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is C. The notation limx→1+s(x) asks specifically for the right-hand limit. Since the function decreases without bound (approaches negative infinity) as x approaches 1 from the right, the right-hand limit does not exist. While we can describe this behavior as approaching negative infinity, limits that approach infinity are considered to not exist in the traditional sense.
From the graph of w(x), as x approaches -4, the function values appear to approach 1.5, but the resolution of the graph makes it difficult to be completely certain. The y-values seem to be between 1.4 and 1.6. What can be concluded about limx→−4w(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is B. Graphical limit estimation inherently involves some uncertainty due to scale and resolution limitations. The best we can do is provide a reasonable approximation based on visual evidence. Saying 'approximately 1.5' acknowledges both the apparent trend and the inherent limitations of graphical analysis.
The graph shows y(x) with a vertical asymptote at x=7. As x approaches 7 from the left, y(x) increases without bound, and as x approaches 7 from the right, y(x) also increases without bound. What is limx→7y(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is C. Even though both one-sided limits have the same infinite behavior (both approach +∞), the limit does not exist in the formal sense because infinity is not a real number. We can describe the behavior as approaching positive infinity, but technically this means the limit does not exist.
The graph of a(x) exhibits a periodic oscillation that dampens as x approaches 2. The amplitude of oscillation decreases, and the function values appear to settle toward 3 as x gets closer to 2. What is limx→2a(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. Dampened oscillation that settles toward a specific value indicates that the limit exists and equals that settling value. Unlike persistent oscillation (which prevents limits from existing), dampened oscillation that converges to a value allows the limit to exist at that converged value.
From the graph of b(x), as x approaches 8 from the left, b(x) approaches 0, and as x approaches 8 from the right, b(x) approaches 0. The function has b(8)=4 marked with a solid dot. What is limx→8b(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The limit is determined by the approaching behavior of the function, not its actual value at the point. Since both one-sided limits equal 0, the two-sided limit is 0, even though b(8) = 4. This represents a point discontinuity.
The graph of c(x) shows a smooth, continuous curve everywhere except at x=−5, where there's a small gap. As x approaches -5 from both directions, the function values approach -2. What is limx→−5c(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. A gap in the function (removable discontinuity) doesn't prevent a limit from existing if both one-sided limits exist and are equal. Since the function approaches -2 from both sides, the limit equals -2, regardless of what happens exactly at x = -5.
From the graph of f(x), there's a hole at (5,3) indicated by an open circle. The surrounding curve behavior shows that as x approaches 5 from either side, f(x) approaches 3. The function is undefined at x=5. What is limx→5f(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. A hole (removable discontinuity) shows where the function would naturally go based on the surrounding curve behavior. Even though f(5) is undefined, the limit exists and equals the y-coordinate of the hole (3) because both one-sided limits approach this value.
Looking at the graph of z(x), there's a gap in the curve at x=−3. The left piece of the curve ends at (−3,5) with an open circle, and the right piece begins at (−3,5) with an open circle. What is limx→−3z(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. Despite the gap at x = -3, both sides of the function approach the same y-value (5). The open circles indicate that the function isn't defined at x = -3, but this doesn't prevent the limit from existing. Since both one-sided limits equal 5, the two-sided limit is 5.
The graph of t(x) shows a smooth curve that passes through the point (0,4) without any breaks, holes, or unusual behavior near x=0. What is limx→0t(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is B. When a function is continuous at a point (no breaks, holes, or jumps), the limit as x approaches that point equals the function value at that point. Since the graph shows t(x) is continuous at x = 0 and t(0) = 4, we have lim(x→0) t(x) = 4.
The graph shows function r(x) with a removable discontinuity at x=−2. There's an open circle at (−2,6) and a solid dot at (−2,1). As x approaches -2 from both sides, the curve heads toward the open circle. What is limx→−2r(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The limit depends on where the function approaches, not where it's actually defined. The open circle at (-2, 6) indicates where the function would naturally go based on the surrounding curve behavior, while the solid dot at (-2, 1) shows an artificially defined value. The limit is 6.
Looking at the graph of d(x), as x approaches 9 from the left, d(x) approaches 6. As x approaches 9 from the right, d(x) approaches 10. There's a jump discontinuity at x=9. What is limx→9−d(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. The notation lim(x→9⁻) specifically asks for the left-hand limit, which is the value the function approaches as x approaches 9 from the left side only. From the graph, this value is 6. The jump discontinuity affects the two-sided limit but not the one-sided limits individually.
From the graph of function q(x), it appears that as x approaches 5 from both sides, q(x) approaches 3.2. However, due to the scale of the graph, this is an approximation. What is the best estimate for limx→5q(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is B. When estimating limits from graphs, we must recognize that our answers are approximations based on visual inspection. The scale and resolution of the graph affect our precision, so 'approximately 3.2' is the most honest assessment of what can be determined graphically.
Looking at the graph of u(x), there's a sharp corner (cusp) at x=3 where the function value is 2. The function approaches this point from both sides, reaching the same y-value. What is limx→3u(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. A cusp or sharp corner affects differentiability but not the existence of limits. Since the function approaches the same y-value (2) from both sides as x approaches 3, the limit exists and equals 2. Cusps create non-differentiable points but don't prevent limits from existing.
The graph of v(x) shows that as x approaches 6 from the left, v(x) approaches 8, and as x approaches 6 from the right, v(x) approaches 8. However, v(6) is undefined (there's no point plotted at x=6). What is limx→6v(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. Limits describe the behavior of a function as it approaches a point, not what happens at the point itself. Since both one-sided limits equal 8, the two-sided limit equals 8, regardless of whether the function is defined at x = 6.
From the graph of function h(x), as x approaches 3 from the left, h(x) approaches 7, but as x approaches 3 from the right, h(x) approaches 2. What can be concluded about limx→3h(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is D. For a two-sided limit to exist, both one-sided limits must exist and be equal. Since the left-hand limit (7) and right-hand limit (2) are different, the two-sided limit does not exist. This represents a jump discontinuity in the function.
The graph of e(x) shows that as x approaches 10, the function values get arbitrarily close to 1.2. The curve appears to level off horizontally near y=1.2 as it approaches x=10 from both sides. What is limx→10e(x)?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. When a graph clearly shows the function leveling off horizontally at a specific y-value as x approaches a point, this indicates the limit equals that y-value. The horizontal leveling at y = 1.2 from both sides indicates that lim(x→10) e(x) = 1.2.
For the graphed function p, estimate limx→0p(x).
Explanation: To estimate this two-sided limit, we need to examine how the function behaves as x approaches 0 from both directions. Tracing along the curve from the left (negative x-values moving right) and from the right (positive x-values moving left), we see that both paths lead the function values toward y = 1. Since the left-hand and right-hand approaches agree at y = 1, the two-sided limit exists and equals 1. The actual function value at x = 0 might be different or undefined, but this doesn't affect the limit. Students often confuse the limit with the function value, but remember that limits describe approach behavior, not arrival values. For two-sided limits to exist, always verify that both one-sided limits exist and are equal.