All questions
Question 1
Consider the function j(x)=2∣3x−9∣+4. If this function is written in the form j(x)=a∣b(x−h)∣+k, what are the values of a, b, h, and k?
- a=2,b=3,h=3,k=4 (correct answer)
- a=6,b=1,h=3,k=4
- a=2,b=3,h=−3,k=4
- a=2,b=1,h=3,k=4
Explanation: To write j(x)=2∣3x−9∣+4 in the form j(x)=a∣b(x−h)∣+k, we need to factor the expression inside the absolute value. Starting with 3x−9, we factor out the 3: 3x−9=3(x−3). Therefore, j(x)=2∣3(x−3)∣+4. Comparing this to the form a∣b(x−h)∣+k, we have a=2, b=3, h=3, and k=4. Option B incorrectly combines the coefficients 2 and 3 to get a=6 and sets b=1. Option C incorrectly identifies h=−3, confusing the sign inside the parentheses. Option D incorrectly sets b=1, failing to recognize that the factor of 3 should remain as the coefficient b.
Question 2
The graph of y=f(x) passes through the point (2,5) and has a horizontal asymptote at y=3. After applying the transformations to create y=4f(21x−1)−2, what is the equation of the new horizontal asymptote?
- y=10 (correct answer)
- y=1
- y=12
- y=14
Explanation: To find the new horizontal asymptote, we need to understand how the transformations affect the original horizontal asymptote at y=3. The transformation y=4f(21x−1)−2 includes: a horizontal stretch by factor 2 and horizontal shift (which don't affect horizontal asymptotes), a vertical stretch by factor 4, and a vertical shift down by 2 units. The horizontal asymptote is affected only by the vertical transformations. Starting with the original asymptote y=3: first apply the vertical stretch by factor 4, giving y=4×3=12, then apply the vertical shift down by 2 units, giving y=12−2=10. Therefore, the new horizontal asymptote is y=10. Option B results from applying the transformations incorrectly: 3−2=1, forgetting the vertical stretch. Option C results from applying only the vertical stretch: 4×3=12, forgetting the vertical shift. Option D results from incorrectly adding instead of subtracting: 4×3+2=14.
Question 3
The function g(x)=f(2x+4)−3 is obtained from f(x) by applying two transformations. If the original function f(x) has a vertical asymptote at x=1, what is the equation of the corresponding vertical asymptote in g(x)?
- x=−1
- x=−23 (correct answer)
- x=21
- x=−25
Explanation: To find where the vertical asymptote occurs in g(x)=f(2x+4)−3, we need to determine when the input to f equals 1 (the location of the original asymptote). So we solve 2x+4=1. This gives 2x=1−4=−3, so x=−23. Therefore, the vertical asymptote of g(x) is at x=−23. The vertical shift of -3 doesn't affect the location of vertical asymptotes, only horizontal transformations do. Option A would result from incorrectly thinking 2x+4=1 gives x=−1. Option C would result from solving 2x=1 and ignoring the +4. Option D would result from incorrectly applying the transformation x=21−4=−25.
Question 4
The function f(x)=x2 is transformed to create g(x)=−(2x+6)2+8. What is the vertex of the parabola represented by g(x)?
- (−3,8) (correct answer)
- (−6,8)
- (−3,−8)
- (3,8)
Explanation: To find the vertex of g(x)=−(2x+6)2+8, we need to identify the transformations applied to f(x)=x2. First, rewrite the expression: g(x)=−(2x+6)2+8=−[2(x+3)]2+8=−4(x+3)2+8. This shows that the function is in vertex form a(x−h)2+k where a=−4, h=−3, and k=8. Therefore, the vertex is at (−3,8). The transformations applied are: horizontal shift left 3 units (due to x+3), horizontal compression by factor 21 (due to the factor of 2 inside), vertical stretch by factor 4, reflection across the x-axis (due to the negative sign), and vertical shift up 8 units. Option B results from incorrectly identifying the horizontal shift as 6 units instead of 3. Option C results from incorrectly applying the reflection to the y-coordinate of the vertex. Option D results from incorrectly determining the direction of the horizontal shift.