All questions
Question 1
Consider the function k(x)=x2−25x2−3x−10. If this function is graphed on a coordinate plane, which statement correctly describes its discontinuities?
- There is a hole at x=5 and a vertical asymptote at x=−5 (correct answer)
- There is a hole at x=−2 and a vertical asymptote at x=5
- There are vertical asymptotes at both x=5 and x=−5
- There is a hole at x=−5 and a vertical asymptote at x=5
Explanation: Factor completely: k(x)=x2−25x2−3x−10=(x−5)(x+5)(x−5)(x+2). The factor (x−5) appears in both numerator and denominator, creating a hole at x=5. The factor (x+5) appears only in the denominator, creating a vertical asymptote at x=−5. Choice B incorrectly places the hole at x=−2 (a zero of the reduced function, not a discontinuity). Choice C ignores the common factor cancellation. Choice D reverses the locations of the hole and asymptote.
Question 2
For the rational function h(x)=x2−4x3−8, what is the domain restriction and what type of discontinuity occurs at x=2?
- Domain: all real numbers except x=±2; vertical asymptote at x=2
- Domain: all real numbers except x=±2; hole at x=2 (correct answer)
- Domain: all real numbers except x=2; vertical asymptote at x=2
- Domain: all real numbers except x=±2; removable discontinuity at x=2
Explanation: Factor the function: h(x)=x2−4x3−8=(x−2)(x+2)(x−2)(x2+2x+4). The factor (x−2) appears in both numerator and denominator, creating a hole (removable discontinuity) at x=2. The factor (x+2) appears only in the denominator, creating a vertical asymptote at x=−2. The domain excludes both x=2 and x=−2. Choice A incorrectly identifies x=2 as a vertical asymptote. Choice C incorrectly excludes x=−2 from domain restrictions. Choice D correctly identifies the removable discontinuity but uses less precise terminology.
Question 3
A student claims that the function f(x)=x2−9x2+x−6 has a hole at x=3 because both the numerator and denominator equal zero when x=3. What is wrong with this reasoning?
- The student is correct; when both numerator and denominator are zero, there is always a hole
- There is no discontinuity at x=3 because the function is defined there
- While both expressions equal zero at x=3, the factored forms show no common factor, so there is a vertical asymptote, not a hole (correct answer)
- The student's logic is flawed; holes only occur when the same linear factor cancels from numerator and denominator
Explanation: Factor both expressions: numerator x2+x−6=(x+3)(x−2) and denominator x2−9=(x+3)(x−3). While both equal zero at x=3, this alone doesn't determine the type of discontinuity. The factored forms show no common factor involving (x−3), so x=3 creates a vertical asymptote, not a hole. A hole occurs only when the same linear factor appears in both numerator and denominator and can be canceled. Choice A gives an incorrect general rule. Choice B is wrong since f(3) is undefined. Choice D correctly identifies the flaw in reasoning.
Question 4
For which value of k will the function f(x)=x2−16x2+kx−12 have a removable discontinuity (hole) at x=4?
- k=−1 (correct answer)
- k=1
- k=3
- k=−3
Explanation: For a hole at x=4, the factor (x−4) must divide both numerator and denominator. The denominator x2−16=(x−4)(x+4) already contains (x−4). For the numerator to also contain (x−4), we need x=4 to be a root: 42+k(4)−12=0, so 16+4k−12=0, giving 4k=−4 and k=−1. We can verify: when k=−1, the numerator becomes x2−x−12=(x−4)(x+3). Choice B gives x2+x−12=(x+4)(x−3), no (x−4) factor. Choice C gives x2+3x−12, which doesn't factor to include (x−4). Choice D gives x2−3x−12, also without (x−4).
Question 5
Consider the rational function f(x)=x2+2x−15x2−9. After factoring both numerator and denominator completely, what can be concluded about the domain and discontinuities of this function?
- The domain is all real numbers except x=−5 and x=3, with vertical asymptotes at both values
- The domain is all real numbers except x=−5 and x=3, with a hole at x=3 and vertical asymptote at x=−5 (correct answer)
- The domain is all real numbers except x=−3 and x=5, with a hole at x=−3 and vertical asymptote at x=5
- The domain is all real numbers except x=−5, with a hole at x=3 and vertical asymptote at x=−5
Explanation: First, factor completely: f(x)=(x+5)(x−3)(x−3)(x+3). The factor (x−3) appears in both numerator and denominator, creating a hole at x=3. The factor (x+5) appears only in the denominator, creating a vertical asymptote at x=−5. The domain excludes both x=3 and x=−5. Choice A incorrectly identifies both as vertical asymptotes. Choice C uses wrong values from incorrectly factoring the denominator. Choice D incorrectly excludes x=3 from the domain restriction.
Question 6
Consider the piecewise-defined function: f(x)={x−2x2−45if x=2if x=2. What type of discontinuity, if any, occurs at x=2?
- No discontinuity; the function is continuous at x=2
- Jump discontinuity because the left and right limits are different
- Removable discontinuity because the rational part has a hole at x=2 (correct answer)
- Essential discontinuity because the function approaches infinity
Explanation: For x=2, we have f(x)=x−2x2−4=x−2(x−2)(x+2)=x+2. So limx→2f(x)=limx→2(x+2)=4. However, f(2)=5. Since the limit exists but doesn't equal the function value, this is a removable discontinuity. The function could be made continuous by redefining f(2)=4. Choice A is wrong because f(2)=limx→2f(x). Choice B is incorrect because left and right limits are both 4. Choice D is wrong because the limit exists and is finite.