All questions
Question 1
Consider the differential equation xy′′−(1+x)y′+y=x2e2x for x>0. Given that y1(x)=1+x and y2(x)=ex are solutions to the corresponding homogeneous equation, a particular solution yp=u1y1+u2y2 is sought using variation of parameters. Which of the following is the correct expression for u1′?
- u1′(x)=−e2x (correct answer)
- u1′(x)=−xe2x
- u1′(x)=e2x
- u1′(x)=−(1+x)e2x
Explanation: First, write the equation in standard form y′′+P(x)y′+Q(x)y=g(x) by dividing by x: y′′−x1+xy′+x1y=xe2x. Thus, g(x)=xe2x. The solutions to the homogeneous equation are y1=1+x and y2=ex. The Wronskian is W(y1,y2)=y1y2′−y1′y2=(1+x)ex−(1)ex=xex. The formula for u1′ is u1′=−Wy2g(x). Substituting the known functions, we get u1′=−xexex(xe2x)=−e2x.
Question 2
Using variation of parameters to solve y′′−2y′+y=xex, a particular solution is sought in the form yp=u1(x)ex+u2(x)xex. What is the integrand for calculating u2(x)?
- x1 (correct answer)
- −1
- 1
- xe2x
Explanation: The homogeneous solutions are y1=ex and y2=xex. The equation is in standard form with g(x)=xex. The Wronskian is W(y1,y2)=y1y2′−y1′y2=ex(ex+xex)−ex(xex)=e2x. The integrand for u2(x) is u2′(x)=Wy1g(x). Substituting the functions, we get u2′=e2xex(ex/x)=e2xe2x/x=x1.
Question 3
Given that y1=e3x and y2=e−3x form a fundamental set of solutions for the homogeneous equation y′′−9y=0, find a particular solution yp for the non-homogeneous equation y′′−9y=12e3x.
- 2xe3x−31e3x
- −2xe3x
- 2xe3x (correct answer)
- 2e3x
Explanation: When you encounter a non-homogeneous differential equation where the forcing function appears in your fundamental set of solutions, you need the method of undetermined coefficients with modification. Since the forcing function 12e3x contains e3x, which matches y1=e3x from your homogeneous solutions, you must multiply your usual guess by x to avoid duplication.
For y′′−9y=12e3x, your particular solution guess should be yp=Axe3x. Taking derivatives: yp′=Ae3x+3Axe3x and yp′′=6Ae3x+9Axe3x.
Substituting into the differential equation:
6Ae3x+9Axe3x−9(Axe3x)=12e3x
The 9Axe3x terms cancel, leaving 6Ae3x=12e3x, so A=2.
Therefore, yp=2xe3x, which is answer C.
Answer A 2xe3x−31e3x incorrectly adds an e3x term, which would be part of the homogeneous solution, not the particular solution.
Answer B −2xe3x has the wrong sign—likely from a calculation error when solving for the coefficient.
Answer D 2e3x forgets the crucial x modification needed when the forcing function matches a homogeneous solution.
Key strategy: Always check if your forcing function appears in the homogeneous solutions. If it does, multiply your guess by x (or x2 if needed for repeated roots).
Question 4
Consider the Cauchy-Euler equation x2y′′−3xy′+4y=x2ln(x) for x>0. Given that the homogeneous solutions are y1=x2 and y2=x2ln(x), which function below is a valid particular solution yp?
- 61(lnx)3
- 21x2(lnx)2
- 65x2(lnx)3
- 61x2(lnx)3 (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a Cauchy-Euler equation with a non-homogeneous term, you need to find a particular solution using the method of undetermined coefficients or variation of parameters. Since one of the homogeneous solutions is y2=x2ln(x), which matches the form of our forcing function x2ln(x), we have a resonance case that requires multiplying our trial solution by an additional ln(x) factor.
For the forcing function x2ln(x), we would normally try yp=Ax2ln(x), but since this matches y2, we must try yp=Ax2(lnx)2. However, this still creates linear dependence issues with our homogeneous solutions, so we need yp=Ax2(lnx)3.
Substituting this form into the differential equation and solving for the coefficient A, we find A=61, giving us yp=61x2(lnx)3. This makes (D) correct.
(A) 61(lnx)3 lacks the x2 factor needed to match the structure of the forcing function. (B) 21x2(lnx)2 has the wrong coefficient and insufficient logarithmic power. (C) 65x2(lnx)3 has the correct form but wrong coefficient—when substituted back into the equation, it won't satisfy the differential equation.
Study tip: In resonance cases with Cauchy-Euler equations, always multiply your trial solution by enough logarithmic factors to ensure linear independence from all homogeneous solutions. The coefficient must then be determined by substitution.
Question 5
In applying the method of variation of parameters to solve y′′+P(x)y′+Q(x)y=g(x), we assume a particular solution of the form yp=u1(x)y1(x)+u2(x)y2(x). The derivation requires imposing the condition u1′y1+u2′y2=0. What is the primary reason for this condition?
- It simplifies the system of equations by making it diagonal, allowing u1′ and u2′ to be solved for independently.
- It is a necessary condition to ensure that the Wronskian of y1 and y2 is non-zero.
- It forces the particular solution yp to be linearly independent from the homogeneous solutions y1 and y2.
- It simplifies the derivative of yp, which prevents second derivatives of u1 and u2 from appearing in the calculations. (correct answer)
Explanation: The method of variation of parameters requires careful handling of derivatives to avoid unnecessarily complex calculations. When you assume a particular solution yp=u1(x)y1(x)+u2(x)y2(x), taking derivatives becomes the key challenge.
Without any constraints, the first derivative would be yp′=u1′y1+u1y1′+u2′y2+u2y2′. Taking the second derivative would then introduce terms like u1′′y1 and u2′′y2, making the system much more complicated since you'd have second derivatives of the unknown functions.
The condition u1′y1+u2′y2=0 eliminates the problematic terms. With this constraint, yp′=u1y1′+u2y2′, and the second derivative becomes yp′′=u1′y1′+u1y1′′+u2′y2′+u2y2′′. This keeps the system manageable with only first derivatives of u1 and u2, which is exactly what answer D describes.
Answer A is incorrect because the system doesn't become diagonal—you still have a coupled 2×2 system to solve. Answer B confuses cause and effect; the Wronskian being non-zero is a requirement for the homogeneous solutions, not something this condition ensures. Answer C is wrong because the particular solution is supposed to be different from the homogeneous solutions—linear independence isn't the goal here.
Study tip: Remember that variation of parameters is all about managing complexity. The seemingly arbitrary condition u1′y1+u2′y2=0 is actually a clever mathematical trick to keep derivatives tractable.
Question 6
For which of the following differential equations is the method of variation of parameters necessary, as opposed to the method of undetermined coefficients?
- y′′+2y′+y=x2e−x
- y′′−y=sin(x)+e2x
- y′′+y=1+ex1 (correct answer)
- y′′+4y=3cos(2x)
Explanation: The method of undetermined coefficients is applicable only when the non-homogeneous term g(x) is a polynomial, exponential, sine, cosine, or a finite sum/product of these. In choice C, g(x)=1+ex1 is not of this form. Therefore, variation of parameters is required. For choices A, B, and D, the non-homogeneous terms (x2e−x, sin(x)+e2x, and 3cos(2x)) are all of the correct form for the method of undetermined coefficients to be applied, although A and D would require using the modification rule.
Question 7
Let y(x) be the solution to the initial value problem y′′−y′−2y=3e2x, with y(0)=0 and y′(0)=0. What is the value of y(ln2)?
- 67−4ln(2)
- 4ln(2)−67 (correct answer)
- 4ln(2)−34
- ln(2)−31
Explanation: When you encounter a second-order linear differential equation with constant coefficients and a non-homogeneous term, you need to find both the homogeneous solution and a particular solution, then apply initial conditions.
First, solve the homogeneous equation y′′−y′−2y=0. The characteristic equation is r2−r−2=0, which factors as (r−2)(r+1)=0, giving roots r=2 and r=−1. So the homogeneous solution is yh=c1e2x+c2e−x.
For the particular solution, since the right side is 3e2x and e2x is already in the homogeneous solution, you must use the method of undetermined coefficients with modification. Try yp=Axe2x. Substituting into the differential equation yields A=1, so yp=xe2x.
The general solution is y=c1e2x+c2e−x+xe2x. Applying y(0)=0 gives c1+c2=0. From y′(0)=0, you get 2c1−c2+1=0. Solving these gives c1=−31 and c2=31.
Therefore, y(x)=−31e2x+31e−x+xe2x. At x=ln2: y(ln2)=−31⋅4+31⋅21+ln(2)⋅4=−34+61+4ln(2)=4ln(2)−67.
Answer A has the terms with opposite signs. Answers C and D contain computational errors in combining fractions or applying initial conditions.
Remember: when the forcing function matches a homogeneous solution term, multiply your particular solution guess by x to avoid linear dependence.
Question 8
The homogeneous solutions to xy′′−y′=0 for x>0 are y1=1 and y2=x2. Using variation of parameters for the equation xy′′−y′=x3, what is a valid particular solution yp?
- 15x5
- 8x4 (correct answer)
- 4x4
- 3x3
Explanation: When you encounter variation of parameters problems, you're finding a particular solution to a non-homogeneous differential equation using the known homogeneous solutions. The method involves constructing yp=u1y1+u2y2 where u1 and u2 are functions to be determined.
For xy′′−y′=x3 with homogeneous solutions y1=1 and y2=x2, you need to solve the system:
u1′y1+u2′y2=0
u1′y1′+u2′y2′=xx3=x2
Substituting y1=1, y1′=0, y2=x2, and y2′=2x:
u1′+u2′x2=0
u2′(2x)=x2
From the second equation: u2′=2x, so u2=4x2
From the first equation: u1′=−u2′x2=−2x3, so u1=−8x4
Therefore: yp=u1y1+u2y2=−8x4(1)+4x2(x2)=−8x4+4x4=8x4
Choice A (15x5) results from integration errors or incorrect setup. Choice C (4x4) comes from forgetting the negative term from u1. Choice D (3x3) suggests attempting undetermined coefficients incorrectly or algebraic mistakes.
The correct answer is B: 8x4.
Study tip: In variation of parameters, always double-check your Wronskian calculation and be meticulous with the integration steps—small algebraic errors compound quickly in this method.
Question 9
A particular solution to y′′+y′−2y=4e−2xln(x) for x>0 is given by yp=u1(x)ex+u2(x)e−2x. Using the method of variation of parameters and setting the constant of integration to zero, what is u2(x)?
- −3x4
- 4x−4xln(x)
- 34xln(x)−34x
- 34x−34xln(x) (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a non-homogeneous differential equation like this, the method of variation of parameters is your tool for finding a particular solution. You'll use the fundamental solutions from the homogeneous equation and vary their constants.
First, solve the homogeneous equation y′′+y′−2y=0. The characteristic equation r2+r−2=0 factors as (r−1)(r+2)=0, giving r=1,−2. So your fundamental solutions are y1=ex and y2=e−2x.
For variation of parameters, you need the Wronskian: W=y1y2′−y1′y2=ex(−2e−2x)−ex(e−2x)=−3e−x.
The formula gives u2′(x)=W(x)y1(x)⋅g(x)=−3e−xex⋅4e−2xln(x)=−3e−x4e−xln(x)=−34ln(x).
Integrating by parts: u2(x)=−34∫ln(x)dx=−34[xln(x)−x]=34x−34xln(x).
This matches answer choice D.
Choice A gives just −3x4, which would come from incorrectly integrating ln(x). Choice B has the wrong sign and missing coefficient. Choice C has the correct terms but wrong signs throughout.
Study tip: Always double-check your integration by parts formula: ∫ln(x)dx=xln(x)−x+C. The negative sign in front often causes sign errors in variation of parameters problems.
Question 10
The differential equation y′′+y=tan(x) has a homogeneous solution yh=c1cos(x)+c2sin(x). Using variation of parameters, the particular solution yp can be expressed in integral form. Which of the following correctly represents yp(x)?
- cos(x)∫sin(x)dx+sin(x)∫−sin(x)tan(x)dx
- cos(x)∫sin(x)tan(x)dx+sin(x)∫sin(x)dx
- cos(x)∫−sin(x)tan(x)dx+sin(x)∫sin(x)dx (correct answer)
- −cos(x)∫sin(x)tan(x)dx+sin(x)∫sin(x)dx
Explanation: When you encounter a second-order linear non-homogeneous differential equation, variation of parameters is a systematic method for finding particular solutions. The technique involves assuming your particular solution has the form yp=u1(x)y1(x)+u2(x)y2(x), where y1=cos(x) and y2=sin(x) are your homogeneous solutions.
The variation of parameters formula gives you:
u1′(x)=−W(x)y2(x)f(x) and u2′(x)=W(x)y1(x)f(x)
where f(x)=tan(x) is your non-homogeneous term and W(x) is the Wronskian. For y1=cos(x) and y2=sin(x), the Wronskian equals 1.
Therefore: u1′(x)=−sin(x)tan(x) and u2′(x)=cos(x)tan(x)=sin(x)
This gives yp=cos(x)∫−sin(x)tan(x)dx+sin(x)∫sin(x)dx, which is answer C.
Answer A incorrectly uses ∫sin(x)dx for the first integral instead of the required ∫−sin(x)tan(x)dx. Answer B has the signs wrong in both integrals - it uses positive sin(x)tan(x) in the first term instead of negative. Answer D correctly identifies the integrands but incorrectly places a negative sign in front of the entire first term rather than just within the integral.
Remember: variation of parameters requires careful attention to the formula's signs and the order of the functions - always double-check your Wronskian calculation and substitute methodically.
Question 11
The general solution to the homogeneous differential equation y′′+4y=0 is yh=c1cos(2x)+c2sin(2x). To find a particular solution to y′′+4y=sec(2x) using the method of variation of parameters, we assume yp=u1(x)cos(2x)+u2(x)sin(2x). Which system of equations must be solved for u1′ and u2′?
- {u1′cos(2x)+u2′sin(2x)=0−2u1′sin(2x)+2u2′cos(2x)=sec(2x) (correct answer)
- {u1′cos(2x)+u2′sin(2x)=sec(2x)−2u1′sin(2x)+2u2′cos(2x)=0
- {u1′cos(2x)+u2′sin(2x)=0u1′cos(2x)+u2′sin(2x)=sec(2x)
- {u1′sin(2x)+u2′cos(2x)=02u1′cos(2x)−2u2′sin(2x)=sec(2x)
Explanation: For the method of variation of parameters, with yp=u1y1+u2y2, the system for u1′ and u2′ is given by u1′y1+u2′y2=0 and u1′y1′+u2′y2′=g(x). Here, y1=cos(2x), y2=sin(2x), and g(x)=sec(2x). The derivatives are y1′=−2sin(2x) and y2′=2cos(2x). Substituting these into the system gives: u1′cos(2x)+u2′sin(2x)=0 and u1′(−2sin(2x))+u2′(2cos(2x))=sec(2x). This matches choice A.
Question 12
When solving y′′+9y=csc(3x) using variation of parameters with y1=cos(3x) and y2=sin(3x), one finds that u1′(x)=−1/3 and u2′(x)=3cot(3x). Assuming constants of integration are zero, what is the resulting particular solution yp(x)?
- −31xsin(3x)+91cos(3x)ln∣sin(3x)∣
- −31xcos(3x)+91sin(3x)ln∣sin(3x)∣ (correct answer)
- −31xcos(3x)+31sin(3x)ln∣sin(3x)∣
- −31cos(3x)+91sin(3x)ln∣sin(3x)∣
Explanation: When you encounter variation of parameters problems, you're finding functions u1(x) and u2(x) such that the particular solution is yp=u1y1+u2y2. Here, you're given that u1′(x)=−31 and u2′(x)=3cot(3x), so you need to integrate these to find u1 and u2.
Integrating u1′(x)=−31 gives u1(x)=−31x (since constants of integration are zero).
For u2′(x)=3cot(3x), recall that cot(3x)=sin(3x)cos(3x). Using substitution with u=sin(3x) and du=3cos(3x)dx:
∫3cot(3x)dx=31∫sin(3x)cos(3x)dx=91ln∣sin(3x)∣
Therefore: u1(x)=−31x and u2(x)=91ln∣sin(3x)∣
The particular solution is:
yp=u1y1+u2y2=(−31x)cos(3x)+(91ln∣sin(3x)∣)sin(3x)
This matches answer B.
Answer A incorrectly has sin(3x) in the first term instead of cos(3x). Answer C has the wrong coefficient 31 instead of 91 for the logarithmic term. Answer D is missing the x variable in the first term entirely.
Study tip: When doing variation of parameters, always double-check your integration, especially for trigonometric functions. The logarithmic integral of cotangent is a common pattern you should memorize.
Question 13
For the equation y′′+4y=csc(2x), after finding the fundamental solutions y1=cos(2x) and y2=sin(2x), the variation of parameters method yields u2′=Wcos(2x)csc(2x). What is the simplified form of this expression?
- u2′=2sin(2x)1
- u2′=2sin(2x)cos(2x)=2cot(2x) (correct answer)
- u2′=4sin(2x)cos(2x)=4cot(2x)
- u2′=cos(2x)csc(2x)=cot(2x)
Explanation: The Wronskian for cos(2x) and sin(2x) is W=cos(2x)⋅2cos(2x)−(−2sin(2x))⋅sin(2x)=2cos2(2x)+2sin2(2x)=2. So u2′=2cos(2x)csc(2x)=2sin(2x)cos(2x)=2cot(2x). Choice A omits the cosine factor entirely. Choice C uses W=4 instead of W=2. Choice D ignores the Wronskian denominator completely.
Question 14
For the equation y′′+y=secxtanx, when applying variation of parameters with fundamental solutions y1=cosx and y2=sinx, what is the correct expression for u1′(x)?
- u1′=−sinx⋅secxtanx=−tan2x (correct answer)
- u1′=−1sinx⋅secxtanx=−tan2x
- u1′=−sinx⋅secxtanx=−sinxtanx
- u1′=−cosxsinxsinx⋅secxtanx=−cosxsinxtan2x
Explanation: In variation of parameters, u1′=−Wy2g(x) where g(x)=secxtanx and W=cos2x+sin2x=1. So u1′=−1sinx⋅secxtanx=−sinx⋅cosx1⋅cosxsinx=−cos2xsin2x=−tan2x. Choice B shows the correct setup but is redundant. Choice C fails to complete the simplification of sinxsecx=cosxsinx=tanx. Choice D incorrectly uses W=cosxsinx instead of W=1.
Question 15
Consider y′′−6y′+9y=e3xx2. When setting up variation of parameters, if the fundamental solutions are y1=e3x and y2=xe3x, which system of equations must be solved for u1′ and u2′?
- e3xu1′+xe3xu2′=e3xx2 and 3e3xu1′+(e3x+3xe3x)u2′=0
- e3xu1′+xe3xu2′=0 and 3e3xu1′+e3xu2′=e3xx2
- u1′+xu2′=0 and 3u1′+(1+3x)u2′=x2
- e3xu1′+xe3xu2′=0 and 3e3xu1′+(e3x+3xe3x)u2′=e3xx2 (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a second-order linear differential equation with a non-homogeneous term, variation of parameters provides a systematic method to find the particular solution. The key is setting up the correct system of equations for the unknown functions' derivatives.
For variation of parameters, you always use this standard system:
- First equation: y1u1′+y2u2′=0
- Second equation: y1′u1′+y2′u2′=g(x)
where g(x) is the right-hand side of your differential equation.
Given y1=e3x and y2=xe3x, you need their derivatives: y1′=3e3x and y2′=e3x+3xe3x (using the product rule). The right-hand side is g(x)=e3xx2.
This gives you the system in answer D: e3xu1′+xe3xu2′=0 and 3e3xu1′+(e3x+3xe3x)u2′=e3xx2.
Answer A incorrectly puts the non-homogeneous term in the first equation instead of the second. Answer B uses the wrong derivative for y2′ in the second equation (missing the 3xe3x term). Answer C attempts to simplify by dividing out e3x, but this changes the fundamental structure and incorrectly modifies the right-hand side.
Remember: in variation of parameters, the first equation always equals zero, and the second equation always equals the non-homogeneous term. Never deviate from this standard form.
Question 16
For the differential equation y′′−2y′+y=exlnx, the method of variation of parameters requires finding u1(x) and u2(x) such that yp=u1y1+u2y2. Given that the fundamental solutions have the form y1=ex and y2=xex, what is the primary computational challenge in this problem?
- Computing the Wronskian involves evaluating dxd(xex) which requires the product rule and careful algebraic manipulation
- The integrals ∫u1′(x)dx and ∫u2′(x)dx will involve lnx terms that require integration by parts multiple times (correct answer)
- The non-homogeneous term exlnx creates resonance with the fundamental solution y1=ex, invalidating the variation of parameters method
- Setting up the system for u1′ and u2′ requires solving a system with coefficients that depend on both x and lnx terms
Explanation: The Wronskian calculation is straightforward: W=ex(ex+xex)−ex(xex)=e2x. The system gives u1′=−lnx and u2′=xlnx. The integral ∫−lnxdx requires integration by parts, and ∫xlnxdx involves a substitution that also leads to logarithmic terms. These integrals are the most computationally intensive part. Choice A incorrectly suggests the Wronskian is difficult - it's actually routine. Choice C is wrong because variation of parameters works even when there's resonance (unlike undetermined coefficients). Choice D mischaracterizes the system setup, which is standard.
Question 17
Consider the equation x2y′′−2xy′+2y=x3. After transforming this to standard form and identifying fundamental solutions y1=x and y2=x2, the variation of parameters method gives u1′=W−x2⋅x and u2′=Wx⋅x. What is the correct value of the Wronskian W?
- W=x⋅x2−x2⋅x=0, indicating linear dependence
- W=x⋅2x−1⋅x2=x2 after factoring
- W=x⋅2x−1⋅x2=2x2−x2=x2 (correct answer)
- W=x2⋅2x−x⋅1=2x3−x=x(2x2−1)
Explanation: When applying variation of parameters to solve differential equations, you need the Wronskian of the fundamental solutions to find the particular solution. The Wronskian is calculated as W=y1y2′−y1′y2, where you must correctly identify each function and its derivative.
Given the fundamental solutions y1=x and y2=x2, you first find their derivatives: y1′=1 and y2′=2x. Now substitute into the Wronskian formula:
W=y1y2′−y1′y2=x⋅2x−1⋅x2=2x2−x2=x2
This confirms that answer C is correct.
Let's examine why the other options fail. Option A incorrectly uses W=y1y2−y2y1, which is just the product of the functions (always zero when rearranged), not the Wronskian formula. This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the definition. Option B starts correctly but claims the answer is x2 "after factoring" without showing the crucial subtraction step 2x2−x2. Option D uses the wrong Wronskian formula W=y2y2′−y1y1′, mixing up which derivatives go with which functions.
Study tip: Always write out the Wronskian formula explicitly as W=y1y2′−y1′y2 and carefully match each function with its correct derivative. The order matters—swapping terms will give you the negative of the correct answer.
Question 18
For y′′+9y=tan(3x), when applying variation of parameters with y1=cos(3x) and y2=sin(3x), the expression for u2′ simplifies to u2′=3cos(3x)tan(3x). To find u2(x), which substitution strategy is most effective?
- Use the identity cos(3x)tan(3x)=sin(3x) and integrate directly to get u2=−9cos(3x)
- Use the substitution w=3x to transform the integral into a more standard form involving coswtanw
- Apply integration by parts with u=cos(3x) and dv=tan(3x)dx
- Rewrite as 3cos(3x)cos(3x)sin(3x)=3sin(3x) and integrate to get u2=−9cos(3x) (correct answer)
Explanation: When solving differential equations using variation of parameters, you'll often encounter integrals that require algebraic simplification before integration. The key insight here is recognizing when trigonometric expressions can be rewritten in simpler forms.
Starting with u2′=3cos(3x)tan(3x), you need to simplify this expression before integrating. Since tan(3x)=cos(3x)sin(3x), you can rewrite the expression as:
u2′=3cos(3x)⋅cos(3x)sin(3x)=3sin(3x)
Now integration is straightforward: u2=∫3sin(3x)dx=−9cos(3x). This confirms answer D is correct.
Answer A makes a fundamental error by claiming cos(3x)tan(3x)=sin(3x) without the factor of 3 in the denominator. This algebraic mistake leads to an incorrect final answer.
Answer B suggests substitution w=3x, which is unnecessary here. While substitution can work, it adds complexity when direct algebraic simplification is simpler and more efficient.
Answer C proposes integration by parts, but this approach is overly complicated for this problem. Integration by parts with tan(3x) would create a more difficult integral than the original.
Strategy tip: When encountering products involving tangent functions, always try rewriting tangent as cossin first. This often reveals immediate simplifications through cancellation, avoiding more complex integration techniques.
Question 19
Consider the differential equation y′′−4y′+4y=e2xlnx. When using variation of parameters to find a particular solution, which expression correctly represents the Wronskian W(y1,y2) of the fundamental solutions?
- W=e4x (correct answer)
- W=xe4x
- W=e2x
- W=2xe4x
Explanation: For the homogeneous equation y′′−4y′+4y=0, the characteristic equation is r2−4r+4=0, which gives (r−2)2=0, so r=2 is a repeated root. The fundamental solutions are y1=e2x and y2=xe2x. The Wronskian is W=y1y2′−y1′y2=e2x(e2x+2xe2x)−2e2x(xe2x)=e4x+2xe4x−2xe4x=e4x. Choice B incorrectly includes the factor x that cancels out. Choice C uses only the exponential part without accounting for the derivative calculations. Choice D incorrectly retains the 2x factor that should cancel.
Question 20
Consider y′′−4y′+3y=e3xsinhx. The fundamental solutions are y1=ex and y2=e3x. When setting up the variation of parameters system, the function g(x)=e3xsinhx can be rewritten in a form that simplifies the integration. Which rewritten form is most advantageous?
- g(x)=e3xsinhx should be left as is since hyperbolic functions integrate directly
- g(x)=e3xsinhx=e3x⋅2ex+e−x=2e4x+e2x
- g(x)=e3xsinhx=e3x⋅2ex−e−x=2e4x−e2x (correct answer)
- g(x)=e3xsinhx=21(e4x−e2x) after applying the identity sinhx=2ex−e−x
Explanation: When solving differential equations using variation of parameters, you need to integrate expressions involving the fundamental solutions and the forcing function. The key insight here is recognizing when rewriting the forcing function will make those integrations much easier.
For this problem, you need to recall the correct definition of hyperbolic sine: sinhx=2ex−e−x, not 2ex+e−x (which is coshx). Using this definition, g(x)=e3xsinhx=e3x⋅2ex−e−x=2e4x−e2x. This exponential form will integrate cleanly when you apply variation of parameters, giving you simple rational coefficients rather than messy hyperbolic function integrals.
Choice A is wrong because while hyperbolic functions do have known integrals, they're more complex than necessary here. Choice B contains a fundamental error—it uses the definition of coshx instead of sinhx, leading to 2e4x+e2x rather than the correct difference form. Choice D, while mathematically correct about the identity, doesn't show the crucial algebraic steps that demonstrate why this rewriting helps—the expansion that reveals the clean exponential terms.
The correct answer is C because it shows both the proper hyperbolic identity and the resulting simplified exponential form.
Study tip: Always double-check hyperbolic function definitions (sinh uses minus, cosh uses plus), and in variation of parameters problems, look for ways to rewrite forcing functions as sums or differences of exponentials—they integrate much more cleanly than other forms.