What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Function Of Sentence Paragraph, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Study Function Of Sentence Paragraph in GRE Verbal with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Identify the function: "Thus, the evidence suggests that the policy's benefits exceed its costs."
Tap card or press Space to flip
State a conclusion drawn from preceding evidence. 'Thus' indicates a logical summation, synthesizing evidence to affirm the policy's net positive impact.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 25
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Function Of Sentence Paragraph, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: State a conclusion drawn from preceding evidence. 'Thus' indicates a logical summation, synthesizing evidence to affirm the policy's net positive impact.
Answer: Concede a limitation while reaffirming the claim. 'Admittedly' acknowledges flaws like sample size, while 'nonetheless' upholds the claim by emphasizing consistency.
Answer: To introduce a contrast or qualification. Beginning with 'However' pivots from the previous idea, introducing nuance or opposition to refine the argument's direction.
Answer: Introduce a contrast and critique the prior point. 'However' signals opposition, allowing the sentence to critique and refine the preceding interpretation effectively.
Answer: To concede a point while preserving the main claim. Conceding with 'granted' or 'admittedly' acknowledges weaknesses honestly, yet maintains the argument's core strength.
Answer: To make a conditional prediction. Conditional predictions forecast outcomes under specific scenarios, adding foresight and depth to the argument's analysis.
Answer: To supply context needed to understand the argument. Background information sets the stage, enabling readers to grasp the argument's relevance and underlying assumptions.
Answer: Evaluate and challenge an alternative explanation. Assessing an alternative view exposes its shortcomings, such as timing issues, to reinforce the primary argument.
Answer: To paraphrase or clarify a prior idea. Using phrases like 'that is' rephrases complex ideas for better comprehension, ensuring the argument remains accessible.
Answer: To draw an analogy or show parallel reasoning. Comparing cases via analogy illustrates shared principles, making abstract reasoning more concrete and persuasive.
Answer: To offer a prescription or recommendation. Proposing actions or policies extends the argument practically, suggesting solutions based on the established reasoning.
Answer: To reinforce the central claim as a conclusion. Restating the thesis in varied phrasing at the end emphasizes and solidifies the main argument as the paragraph concludes.
Answer: To establish a definition that frames later claims. Defining a key term creates a foundational understanding that guides and supports the argument's subsequent assertions.
Answer: To propose a causal explanation. Identifying a cause links an effect to its origin, providing a reasoned account that explains phenomena within the argument.
Answer: To provide supporting premises for a claim. Listing reasons with causal indicators builds a logical foundation by offering multiple justifications for the asserted claim.
Answer: To differentiate concepts and prevent confusion. Specifying differences between ideas clarifies boundaries, avoiding misinterpretation and sharpening the argument's precision.
Answer: To draw an inference or state a conclusion. Using 'Therefore' or 'Thus' synthesizes prior evidence into a logical outcome, advancing the argument toward resolution.
Answer: To address a counterargument and strengthen the position. Acknowledging and refuting an objection demonstrates thorough reasoning and bolsters the argument's overall persuasiveness.
Answer: To illustrate and support the preceding generalization. A concrete example makes an abstract claim more relatable and credible by demonstrating its application in a specific instance.
Answer: Paraphrase to clarify the preceding statement. 'In other words' rephrases for clarity, distinguishing actual changes from perceptual ones in the argument.
Answer: To signal a shift and maintain coherence. Transitional sentences connect ideas smoothly, ensuring logical flow and unity within the paragraph's structure.
Answer: Provide an example supporting a prior claim. Specific examples like emission reductions concretely demonstrate the validity of a general claim through real-world application.
Answer: To supply empirical evidence for a claim. Presenting data or statistics offers objective support, enhancing the claim's validity through verifiable information.
Answer: To provide a topic sentence that sets the focus. A topic sentence outlines the paragraph's main idea, guiding the reader and organizing the ensuing discussion coherently.
Answer: To state implications or significance. Explaining a claim's broader relevance or consequences highlights its importance and extends the argument's impact.