What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Identify Assumptions, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Study Identify Assumptions in GRE Verbal with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Identify the assumption: "Company A has lower prices than B; therefore A offers better value."
Tap card or press Space to flip
Quality and other costs are comparable between A and B. Value comparisons assume equivalence in non-price factors to isolate the pricing advantage.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 25
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Identify Assumptions, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Quality and other costs are comparable between A and B. Value comparisons assume equivalence in non-price factors to isolate the pricing advantage.
Answer: Not a necessary assumption. If the argument remains intact after negation, the statement is not required for the conclusion to hold.
Answer: Too strong. Overly strong choices exceed what's needed, making them incorrect as they aren't minimally required.
Answer: An unstated claim that must be true for the conclusion to follow. This captures the essential role of assumptions as implicit links ensuring the argument's logical validity.
Answer: A necessary assumption. Negation causing the argument to fail confirms the statement's role as a vital unspoken support.
Answer: Other places are sufficiently similar that X will also reduce accidents there. This assumes comparability across contexts, a common requirement in generalization arguments.
Answer: A restated conclusion. Restating the conclusion circularly avoids providing the missing link that assumptions must supply.
Answer: A gap between evidence and conclusion (missing link). Assumptions typically connect premises to conclusions by filling unstated logical voids in the reasoning.
Answer: A conclusion is the claim argued for; an assumption enables that claim. Conclusions represent the argument's main point, while assumptions are unspoken supports making that point viable.
Answer: You are similar to the study subjects in relevant ways. Personal application from studies requires assuming representativeness in key characteristics.
Answer: A paraphrase of evidence. Paraphrasing evidence repeats stated information without bridging the necessary gap to the conclusion.
Answer: Negate it and see whether the argument collapses. Negating a potential assumption tests its necessity by observing if the argument's logic fails without it.
Answer: A premise is stated support; an assumption is unstated required support. Premises provide explicit evidence, whereas assumptions are unspoken necessities bridging gaps in reasoning.
Answer: A claim that must be true for the argument to work. Necessary assumptions are indispensable for the conclusion to logically follow from the given premises.
Answer: Background adds context; an assumption is necessary for the reasoning. Background information offers supplementary context, unlike assumptions which are critical for the argument's logic.
Answer: Lina will take the same test under normal conditions. Universal claims imply assumptions about consistent conditions for all cases in the category.
Answer: An out-of-scope statement. Out-of-scope statements introduce irrelevant elements, failing to address the argument's specific logical gaps.
Answer: An inference can be drawn; an assumption must hold for the argument. Inferences are logical derivations from premises, but assumptions are required truths for the argument's coherence.
Answer: Building the park will not increase other factors that raise crime. Policy recommendations assume no offsetting effects that could negate the intended benefits.
Answer: The negation test. The negation test evaluates whether a statement is essential by checking if its denial undermines the argument.
Answer: Having a degree is a reliable indicator of managerial effectiveness. Indicator assumptions link observable traits to inferred qualities in evaluative arguments.
Answer: Age is positively associated with value for paintings of this type. Value attributions based on attributes assume a correlative relationship in the relevant domain.
Answer: A claim that, if true, guarantees the conclusion. Sufficient assumptions, when added, make the argument airtight by ensuring the conclusion is inescapable.
Answer: No other major factor caused the sales increase. Causal claims assume no confounding variables explain the observed correlation.
Answer: Popularity among teens will generate sufficient revenue (ads, fees, or sales). Profitability from popularity assumes effective monetization mechanisms are in place.