What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Passage Structure Organization, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Study Passage Structure Organization in GRE Verbal with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the structural purpose of a rebuttal following a counterargument?
Tap card or press Space to flip
To weaken the opposing view and reinforce the author's position. Rebuttals counter opposing arguments by highlighting flaws, thereby strengthening the original thesis.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 24
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Passage Structure Organization, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: To weaken the opposing view and reinforce the author's position. Rebuttals counter opposing arguments by highlighting flaws, thereby strengthening the original thesis.
Answer: To state that paragraph's main point and guide the details. A topic sentence establishes the paragraph's focus, ensuring that supporting details align coherently with it.
Answer: The central claim the passage as a whole aims to convey. It represents the overarching thesis that unifies all elements of the passage's argument or exposition.
Answer: To synthesize and reinforce the main claim or final takeaway. It integrates prior ideas to emphasize the central message, providing closure and reinforcing key insights.
Answer: To predict where key ideas appear and locate support quickly. Understanding the passage's structure allows efficient navigation to anticipate content placement and retrieve evidence for questions.
Answer: Find the claim supported by other statements and not supporting another. The main conclusion is hierarchically superior, with other elements providing justification rather than deriving from it.
Answer: Evidence or illustration supporting the preceding point. It provides concrete data or instances to substantiate the immediately prior claim in the passage's logic.
Answer: A conclusion, inference, or result drawn from prior statements. Cause-effect transitions denote logical progression, linking evidence to derived outcomes or final assertions.
Answer: Another supporting point in the same direction as the prior one. Addition transitions build on existing arguments by introducing parallel evidence or ideas to reinforce the point.
Answer: Counterargument introducing an opposing view. This introduces an alternative perspective that contrasts with the author's, often for subsequent rebuttal.
Answer: Supporting illustration is about to follow, not a new main claim. Exemplification cues introduce specific instances that elaborate on general claims without altering the main direction.
Answer: Conclusion inferred from earlier premises. The transition signals a deductive outcome based on accumulated evidence from previous sentences.
Answer: It states the passage's main claim and frames what follows. The thesis provides the foundational argument that organizes and directs the subsequent development of ideas.
Answer: To present an opposing view that the author will address. It introduces alternative perspectives to demonstrate the author's awareness and set up a response or refutation.
Answer: Primary is the main point; subsidiary supports or qualifies it. Primary claims form the core thesis, whereas subsidiary ones provide auxiliary support or modifications to it.
Answer: A shift to an opposing point, limitation, or correction. Contrast transitions indicate a pivot in the argument, introducing qualifications or refutations to prior ideas.
Answer: The claim is limited in scope or strength. Qualification cues moderate assertions, indicating boundaries to prevent overgeneralization in the argument.
Answer: Skeptical or critical toward the claim being qualified. The 'but' introduces a contrasting critique, revealing the author's doubt or disagreement with the initial claim.
Answer: To grant a limited point while maintaining the main claim. Concessions acknowledge partial validity of counterpoints to build credibility while preserving the primary argument.
Answer: It illustrates or supports a claim rather than being the claim. Examples function as evidence to substantiate or elucidate the broader assertion without constituting the core idea itself.
Answer: Rebuttal of a prior view or correction of a preceding claim. The sentence uses contrast to challenge and correct a preceding viewpoint, advancing the author's position.
Answer: Concession followed by the author's main emphasis. The structure admits a drawback but pivots to highlight a stronger positive aspect, maintaining argumentative balance.
Answer: Background sets context; evidence directly supports a specific claim. Background offers general context without direct linkage, while evidence is targeted to bolster particular assertions.
Answer: To clarify a key term so later claims can be interpreted correctly. Definitions ensure precise understanding of concepts, enabling accurate comprehension of the passage's subsequent arguments.