HSPT Quiz: Apply Number Concepts
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Apply Number ConceptsQuestion 1 of 20

In the decimal representation of 512\frac{5}{12}, what is the sum of the first four digits that appear after the decimal point?

15
16
17
18
← Back to quizzes

HSPT Quiz

HSPT Quiz: Apply Number Concepts

Practice Apply Number Concepts in HSPT with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Apply Number Concepts, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for HSPT.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

In the decimal representation of 512\frac{5}{12}, what is the sum of the first four digits that appear after the decimal point?

  1. 15
  2. 16
  3. 17 (correct answer)
  4. 18

Explanation: When you encounter questions asking for digits in decimal representations of fractions, you need to perform long division to convert the fraction to its decimal form. To find the decimal representation of 512\frac{5}{12}, divide 5 by 12 using long division. Since 5 is smaller than 12, you'll get 0 before the decimal point and need to work with 50 ÷ 12. 50 ÷ 12 = 4 remainder 2, so the first digit after the decimal is 4. Bring down a 0 to get 20 ÷ 12 = 1 remainder 8, so the second digit is 1. Bring down a 0 to get 80 ÷ 12 = 6 remainder 8, so the third digit is 6. Bring down a 0 to get 80 ÷ 12 = 6 remainder 8, so the fourth digit is 6. Therefore, 512=0.4166...\frac{5}{12} = 0.4166... and the first four digits after the decimal point are 4, 1, 6, and 6. The sum is 4 + 1 + 6 + 6 = 17, making C correct. Choice A (15) might result from miscounting digits or making arithmetic errors during division. Choice B (16) could come from adding incorrectly: 4 + 1 + 6 + 6 = 17, but getting 16 suggests dropping one from the sum. Choice D (18) might occur if you mistakenly included an extra digit or made an error in the long division process. Remember that converting fractions to decimals through long division requires careful tracking of remainders at each step. Double-check your division and addition to avoid simple computational errors.

Question 2

A number in the form 10n110^n - 1 (where nn is a positive integer) is written in decimal notation. If this number has exactly 15 digits that are 9's, what is the value of nn?

  1. 14
  2. 15 (correct answer)
  3. 16
  4. 17

Explanation: When you see expressions of the form 10n110^n - 1, you're dealing with a pattern that creates numbers made entirely of 9's. Understanding this pattern is crucial for place value and powers of 10 problems. Let's explore what 10n110^n - 1 produces. When n=1n = 1: 1011=101=910^1 - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9 (one digit that's 9). When n=2n = 2: 1021=1001=9910^2 - 1 = 100 - 1 = 99 (two digits that are 9's). When n=3n = 3: 1031=10001=99910^3 - 1 = 1000 - 1 = 999 (three digits that are 9's). The pattern is clear: 10n110^n - 1 always produces exactly nn digits, and every digit is 9. Since the problem states that 10n110^n - 1 has exactly 15 digits that are 9's, we need n=15n = 15. This gives us 10151=999,999,999,999,99910^{15} - 1 = 999,999,999,999,999 (fifteen 9's). Looking at the wrong answers: (A) 14 would give us 1014110^{14} - 1, which has only 14 digits of 9's, not 15. (C) 16 would produce 1016110^{16} - 1, which has 16 digits of 9's, exceeding what we need. (D) 17 would create 1017110^{17} - 1 with 17 digits of 9's, also too many. The answer is (B) 15. Study tip: Remember that 10n110^n - 1 always creates exactly nn consecutive 9's. This direct relationship between the exponent and the number of 9's is a reliable pattern you can use on similar problems.

Question 3

The number 2432532^4 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^3 is written in standard decimal form. How many zeros does this number end with?

  1. 3 (correct answer)
  2. 4
  3. 5
  4. 2

Explanation: When you see a question asking how many zeros a number ends with, you're being asked to find trailing zeros - which come from factors of 10. Since 10=2×510 = 2 \times 5, each trailing zero requires one factor of 2 and one factor of 5 in the prime factorization. Let's examine 2432532^4 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^3. To find trailing zeros, count how many complete pairs of 2 and 5 you can make. You have four factors of 2 and three factors of 5. Since you need both a 2 and a 5 to make each factor of 10, you're limited by whichever you have fewer of. Here, you have only three factors of 5, so you can make exactly three factors of 10, giving you three trailing zeros. To verify: 243253=169125=18,0002^4 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^3 = 16 \cdot 9 \cdot 125 = 18,000, which indeed ends in three zeros. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice B (4) incorrectly counts the total number of factors of 2, ignoring that you need matching factors of 5. Choice C (5) might come from adding the exponents 2 and 3, which has no mathematical basis for this problem. Choice D (2) could result from miscounting the factors or making an arithmetic error. The correct answer is A. Key strategy: For trailing zeros, always take the minimum of the powers of 2 and 5 in the prime factorization. The factor that appears less frequently determines how many complete factors of 10 you can form.

Question 4

The number M=3100750M = 3^{100} \cdot 7^{50} is divisible by 21k21^k for some positive integer kk. What is the largest possible value of kk?

  1. 25
  2. 33
  3. 50 (correct answer)
  4. 100

Explanation: When you encounter problems about the highest power of one number that divides another, you need to think about prime factorization and how exponents combine. First, let's factor 21=3721 = 3 \cdot 7, so 21k=3k7k21^k = 3^k \cdot 7^k. For 21k21^k to divide M=3100750M = 3^{100} \cdot 7^{50}, we need 3k3^k to divide 31003^{100} and 7k7^k to divide 7507^{50}. This means we need k100k \leq 100 and k50k \leq 50 simultaneously. The limiting factor is the smaller exponent. Since kk must satisfy both conditions, the largest possible value is k=50k = 50. We can verify: 2150=35075021^{50} = 3^{50} \cdot 7^{50} divides 31007503^{100} \cdot 7^{50} because 5010050 \leq 100 and 505050 \leq 50. However, 2151=35175121^{51} = 3^{51} \cdot 7^{51} would not divide MM because 7517^{51} cannot divide 7507^{50}. Looking at the wrong answers: (A) 25 is too conservative—we can go higher since both prime powers allow it. (B) 33 falls into the same trap of not pushing to the true maximum. (D) 100 ignores the constraint from the 7507^{50} factor; while 31003^{100} could support k=100k = 100, the 7507^{50} term limits us to k=50k = 50. The answer is C) 50. Strategy tip: In divisibility problems involving composite numbers, always break down to prime factors first, then find the limiting exponent—the smallest one determines your maximum.

Question 5

If K=154×82×53K = 15^4 \times 8^2 \times 5^3, how many trailing zeros does the integer K have when written in standard form?

  1. 4
  2. 6 (correct answer)
  3. 7
  4. 9

Explanation: The number of trailing zeros in an integer is determined by the number of times 10 is a factor in its prime factorization. Since 10=2×510 = 2 \times 5, we need to find the number of pairs of 2 and 5 in the prime factorization of K. First, express K in terms of its prime factors: K=(3×5)4×(23)2×53K = (3 \times 5)^4 \times (2^3)^2 \times 5^3. Using the rules of exponents, this simplifies to: K=(34×54)×(26)×53K = (3^4 \times 5^4) \times (2^6) \times 5^3. Now, combine the powers of the same bases: K=26×34×5(4+3)=26×34×57K = 2^6 \times 3^4 \times 5^{(4+3)} = 2^6 \times 3^4 \times 5^7. The number of factors of 2 is 6, and the number of factors of 5 is 7. The number of pairs of (2, 5) is limited by the smaller of these two exponents, which is 6. Therefore, K has 6 trailing zeros.

Question 6

The least common multiple (LCM) of 1515 and 1818 is:

  1. 45
  2. 60
  3. 90 (correct answer)
  4. 180

Explanation: When you encounter LCM questions, you're finding the smallest positive number that both given numbers divide into evenly. There are two reliable methods: listing multiples or using prime factorization. Let's use prime factorization for 1515 and 1818:

  • 15=3×515 = 3 \times 5
  • 18=2×3218 = 2 \times 3^2
To find the LCM, take the highest power of each prime factor that appears: 21×32×51=2×9×5=902^1 \times 3^2 \times 5^1 = 2 \times 9 \times 5 = 90. You can verify this by checking that 90÷15=690 ÷ 15 = 6 and 90÷18=590 ÷ 18 = 5, confirming both divide evenly. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice (A) 4545 only works for 1515 (since 45÷15=345 ÷ 15 = 3) but fails for 1818 because 45÷18=2.545 ÷ 18 = 2.5. Choice (B) 6060 works for 1515 (60÷15=460 ÷ 15 = 4) but not for 1818 (60÷18=3.33...60 ÷ 18 = 3.33...). Choice (D) 180180 is a common multiple of both numbers (180÷15=12180 ÷ 15 = 12 and 180÷18=10180 ÷ 18 = 10), but it's not the least common multiple—it's actually 2×902 \times 90. Remember that the LCM will always be greater than or equal to the larger of your two numbers, but you're looking for the smallest such number. When prime factorization seems complex, you can also list multiples systematically: 15,30,45,60,75,90...15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90... and 18,36,54,72,90...18, 36, 54, 72, 90... until you find the first match.

Question 7

In the number 4,205,6874,205,687, what is the value of the digit 22?

  1. 2,000,000
  2. 200,000 (correct answer)
  3. 20,000
  4. 2,000

Explanation: When you encounter a question about place value, you need to identify which position a digit occupies in a number and understand what that position represents in our base-ten number system. In the number 4,205,6874,205,687, let's identify the place value of each digit by working from right to left. The rightmost digit (7) is in the ones place, then 8 is in the tens place, 6 is in the hundreds place, 5 is in the thousands place, 0 is in the ten-thousands place, 2 is in the hundred-thousands place, and 4 is in the millions place. The digit 2 sits in the hundred-thousands place, which means its value is 2×100,000=200,0002 \times 100,000 = 200,000. This makes choice B correct. Let's examine why the other answers are wrong. Choice A (2,000,000) represents the millions place value - this would be correct if the 2 were in the leftmost position where the 4 currently sits. Choice C (20,000) represents the ten-thousands place value, which is one position to the right of where our 2 actually appears. Choice D (2,000) represents the thousands place value, which is two positions to the right of the 2's actual location. For place value questions, always count positions carefully from right to left, and remember the pattern: ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, ten-thousands, hundred-thousands, millions. Using commas as guides helps too - the 2 appears right after the first comma from the left, confirming it's in the hundred-thousands place.

Question 8

Which of the following numbers has exactly three different prime factors?

  1. 30 (correct answer)
  2. 18
  3. 28
  4. 45

Explanation: When you encounter questions about prime factors, you need to break each number down into its prime factorization—expressing it as a product of prime numbers only. The question asks for exactly three different prime factors, so you're looking for three distinct primes that multiply together (possibly with repetition) to form the number. Let's examine each option systematically: Choice A (30): 30=2×3×530 = 2 \times 3 \times 5. This gives us exactly three different prime factors: 2, 3, and 5. This matches what we're looking for. Choice B (18): 18=2×32=2×3×318 = 2 \times 3^2 = 2 \times 3 \times 3. While 3 appears twice, there are only two different prime factors: 2 and 3. This doesn't meet our requirement. Choice C (28): 28=4×7=22×7=2×2×728 = 4 \times 7 = 2^2 \times 7 = 2 \times 2 \times 7. This has only two different prime factors: 2 and 7. The factor 2 appears twice, but we only count distinct primes. Choice D (45): 45=9×5=32×5=3×3×545 = 9 \times 5 = 3^2 \times 5 = 3 \times 3 \times 5. This has only two different prime factors: 3 and 5. Only choice A has exactly three different prime factors, making it the correct answer. Study tip: When counting prime factors, always distinguish between "different prime factors" and "total prime factors." Write out the complete prime factorization first, then count the unique primes. Don't be fooled by repeated factors—focus on how many distinct primes appear in the factorization.

Question 9

Which of the following is the prime factorization of 198198?

  1. 2×3×332 \times 3 \times 33
  2. 2×32×112 \times 3^{2} \times 11 (correct answer)
  3. 22×3×112^{2} \times 3 \times 11
  4. 2×9×112 \times 9 \times 11

Explanation: Prime factorization questions require you to break down a number into its smallest prime factors. When you see a question like this, your goal is to systematically divide the given number by prime numbers until you can't divide anymore. To find the prime factorization of 198, start by dividing by the smallest prime numbers. First, 198 is even, so divide by 2: 198÷2=99198 ÷ 2 = 99. Now factor 99. Since the digits of 99 sum to 18 (which is divisible by 3), divide by 3: 99÷3=3399 ÷ 3 = 33. Continue with 33: 33÷3=1133 ÷ 3 = 11. Since 11 is prime, you're done. Therefore: 198=2×3×3×11=2×32×11198 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 11 = 2 × 3^2 × 11. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A gives 2×3×332 × 3 × 33, but 33 isn't prime since 33=3×1133 = 3 × 11. This represents incomplete factorization. Choice C shows 22×3×11=4×3×11=1322^2 × 3 × 11 = 4 × 3 × 11 = 132, which equals the wrong number entirely. Choice D gives 2×9×112 × 9 × 11, but 9 isn't prime since 9=329 = 3^2, making this another case of incomplete factorization. Choice B, 2×32×112 × 3^2 × 11, correctly shows all prime factors with proper exponents. Strategy tip: Always verify your prime factorization by multiplying back: 2×32×11=2×9×11=1982 × 3^2 × 11 = 2 × 9 × 11 = 198. Also remember that prime factorization must use only prime numbers (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, etc.) — if you see composite numbers like 9, 15, or 33 in an answer, it's incomplete.

Question 10

Which of the following numbers is a multiple of 1414 but not a multiple of 66?

  1. 56 (correct answer)
  2. 84
  3. 108
  4. 126

Explanation: This question tests your understanding of multiples and how to check divisibility by composite numbers. When determining if a number is a multiple of another number, you need to check if the division results in a whole number with no remainder. Let's check each option systematically. For a number to be a multiple of 14, it must be divisible by 14. For it to NOT be a multiple of 6, division by 6 must leave a remainder. Choice A: 56÷14=456 ÷ 14 = 4 (exact), so 56 is a multiple of 14. 56÷6=9.33...56 ÷ 6 = 9.33... (not exact), so 56 is NOT a multiple of 6. This satisfies both conditions. Choice B: 84÷14=684 ÷ 14 = 6 (exact), so 84 is a multiple of 14. However, 84÷6=1484 ÷ 6 = 14 (exact), so 84 IS also a multiple of 6. This fails the "not a multiple of 6" requirement. Choice C: 108÷14=7.71...108 ÷ 14 = 7.71... (not exact), so 108 is NOT a multiple of 14. This immediately eliminates this choice since it fails the first condition. Choice D: 126÷14=9126 ÷ 14 = 9 (exact), so 126 is a multiple of 14. However, 126÷6=21126 ÷ 6 = 21 (exact), so 126 IS also a multiple of 6. Like choice B, this fails the second condition. Only choice A meets both criteria: it's a multiple of 14 but not a multiple of 6. Strategy tip: For "multiple but not multiple" questions, always check both conditions systematically. Many wrong answers will satisfy one condition but not both, making this a good way to eliminate choices quickly.

Question 11

Which pair of numbers are consecutive multiples of 99?

  1. 42 and 51
  2. 45 and 54 (correct answer)
  3. 48 and 57
  4. 54 and 72

Explanation: When you encounter questions about consecutive multiples, you're looking for two numbers that are both multiples of the given number and follow each other in sequence with no other multiples between them. To find consecutive multiples of 9, start by identifying what multiples of 9 look like. Since 9×1=99 \times 1 = 9, 9×2=189 \times 2 = 18, 9×3=279 \times 3 = 27, and so on, consecutive multiples of 9 will differ by exactly 9. For example, 27 and 36 are consecutive multiples because 27=9×327 = 9 \times 3 and 36=9×436 = 9 \times 4. Let's check each option by verifying both numbers are multiples of 9 and consecutive: Choice A gives us 42 and 51. While 42=9×4.6742 = 9 \times 4.67 (not a whole number), 42 isn't even a multiple of 9, so this pair fails immediately. Choice B presents 45 and 54. Here, 45=9×545 = 9 \times 5 and 54=9×654 = 9 \times 6. Both are multiples of 9, and since they represent the 5th and 6th multiples, they are consecutive. Choice C offers 48 and 57. Since 48=9×5.3348 = 9 \times 5.33 (not whole), 48 isn't a multiple of 9, eliminating this option. Choice D shows 54 and 72. While 54=9×654 = 9 \times 6 and 72=9×872 = 9 \times 8, these represent the 6th and 8th multiples of 9. The 7th multiple (63) falls between them, so they're not consecutive. Therefore, B is correct. Study tip: When checking consecutive multiples, divide each number by the base to ensure you get consecutive whole numbers. This quick division check will save you time and prevent errors.

Question 12

What is the greatest three-digit multiple of 88?

  1. 992 (correct answer)
  2. 996
  3. 988
  4. 984

Explanation: When you're looking for the greatest three-digit multiple of a number, you need to work backwards from the largest possible three-digit number, which is 999. To find the greatest three-digit multiple of 8, divide 999 by 8: 999÷8=124.875999 ÷ 8 = 124.875. Since we need a whole number of groups of 8, we round down to 124. This means the greatest three-digit multiple of 8 is 124×8=992124 × 8 = 992. You can verify this by checking that 992 is divisible by 8: 992÷8=124992 ÷ 8 = 124 exactly, with no remainder. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice B (996) might seem tempting since it's closer to 999, but 996÷8=124.5996 ÷ 8 = 124.5, which isn't a whole number, so 996 isn't a multiple of 8. Choice C (988) is indeed a multiple of 8 (988÷8=123.5988 ÷ 8 = 123.5... wait, that's not right either — let me recalculate: 988÷8=123.5988 ÷ 8 = 123.5, so this isn't a multiple of 8). Actually, 984÷8=123984 ÷ 8 = 123, so choice D (984) is a multiple of 8, but it's smaller than 992. The correct answer is A (992). Study tip: When finding the greatest multiple of a number within a range, always divide the upper limit by that number, round down to the nearest whole number, then multiply back. This systematic approach prevents you from getting distracted by answer choices that look close but aren't actually multiples.

Question 13

If pp is the least common multiple of 2424 and 3030, and qq is their greatest common factor, what is pq\dfrac{p}{q}?

  1. 4
  2. 10
  3. 20 (correct answer)
  4. 40

Explanation: When you encounter problems involving least common multiple (LCM) and greatest common factor (GCF), start by finding the prime factorizations of both numbers. For 24: 24=23×3124 = 2^3 \times 3^1 For 30: 30=21×31×5130 = 2^1 \times 3^1 \times 5^1 To find the LCM, take the highest power of each prime factor that appears: p=23×31×51=8×3×5=120p = 2^3 \times 3^1 \times 5^1 = 8 \times 3 \times 5 = 120 To find the GCF, take the lowest power of each common prime factor: q=21×31=6q = 2^1 \times 3^1 = 6 Therefore, pq=1206=20\frac{p}{q} = \frac{120}{6} = 20, which is answer choice C. Let's examine why the other answers are incorrect: A) 4 might result from confusing the relationship between factors or making calculation errors with the prime factorizations. B) 10 could come from incorrectly finding either the LCM or GCF. For instance, you might get this if you mistakenly calculated the GCF as 12 instead of 6. D) 40 is a common trap answer that appears when students mix up the LCM and GCF calculations or make arithmetic errors in the division. Remember this key relationship: for any two numbers, their product equals their LCM times their GCF. You can use this as a check: 24×30=72024 \times 30 = 720 and 120×6=720120 \times 6 = 720 ✓. This relationship can also provide an alternative solution method when you're short on time.

Question 14

A school bell rings every 18 minutes, and a class-change bell rings every 24 minutes. They both ring together at 9:00 AM. At what time will they next ring together?

  1. 9:36 AM
  2. 9:42 AM
  3. 10:12 AM (correct answer)
  4. 10:24 AM

Explanation: When you see a problem asking when two events that occur at regular intervals will happen together again, you're dealing with a least common multiple (LCM) problem. The key insight is that both bells will ring together at time intervals equal to the LCM of their individual periods. To find when the bells ring together again, you need the LCM of 18 and 24 minutes. Start by finding the prime factorization of each number: 18=2×3218 = 2 \times 3^2 and 24=23×324 = 2^3 \times 3. The LCM uses the highest power of each prime factor: LCM=23×32=8×9=72LCM = 2^3 \times 3^2 = 8 \times 9 = 72 minutes. Since both bells rang together at 9:00 AM, they'll ring together again 72 minutes later. Converting 72 minutes to hours and minutes: 72=60+12=1 hour 12 minutes72 = 60 + 12 = 1 \text{ hour } 12 \text{ minutes}. Adding this to 9:00 AM gives 10:12 AM, which is answer choice C. Choice A (9:36 AM) represents 36 minutes after 9:00 AM, which is double the school bell's period but not a multiple of 24. Choice B (9:42 AM) is 42 minutes later, which isn't a multiple of either 18 or 24. Choice D (10:24 AM) represents 84 minutes, which while close to 72, doesn't work since neither bell rings at 84-minute intervals from the start time. For LCM problems on the HSPT, always find the least common multiple of the given periods, then add that time interval to your starting point. Don't get trapped by answer choices that are simple multiples of just one of the periods.

Question 15

Which digit can be placed in the square to make 878\,\square\,7 divisible by 99?

  1. 2
  2. 3 (correct answer)
  3. 5
  4. 9

Explanation: When you encounter a divisibility problem like this, you need to recall the divisibility rule for 9: a number is divisible by 9 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9. For the three-digit number 878\square7, you need to find which digit makes the sum 8++78 + \square + 7 divisible by 9. This means you need 15+15 + \square to be divisible by 9. Since 15=9+615 = 9 + 6, we know that 15 leaves a remainder of 6 when divided by 9. To make the total sum divisible by 9, you need to add enough to eliminate this remainder of 6. The smallest positive number that does this is 3, because 15+3=1815 + 3 = 18, and 18 is divisible by 9 (18÷9=218 ÷ 9 = 2). Let's check why each wrong answer fails: Choice A gives us 8+2+7=178 + 2 + 7 = 17, and 17÷9=117 ÷ 9 = 1 remainder 88, so 817 is not divisible by 9. Choice C gives us 8+5+7=208 + 5 + 7 = 20, and 20÷9=220 ÷ 9 = 2 remainder 22, so 857 is not divisible by 9. Choice D gives us 8+9+7=248 + 9 + 7 = 24, and while 24 is divisible by 9, choice B (3) is the correct answer since 8+3+7=188 + 3 + 7 = 18 is also divisible by 9, and B appears before D in the options. Remember: for divisibility by 9, always check if the sum of digits is a multiple of 9. This rule works for any size number and is much faster than doing long division.

Question 16

In 7,164,059, the value of the digit 66 is how many times the value of the digit 44?

  1. 6
  2. 10
  3. 15 (correct answer)
  4. 20

Explanation: When you encounter questions about digit values in large numbers, you're working with place value concepts. Each digit's value depends on its position, and comparing these values often reveals important relationships. In the number 7,164,059, you need to identify where each digit appears. The digit 6 is in the ten-thousands place, giving it a value of 6×10,000=60,0006 \times 10,000 = 60,000. The digit 4 is in the thousands place, giving it a value of 4×1,000=4,0004 \times 1,000 = 4,000. To find how many times larger 60,000 is than 4,000, divide: 60,0004,000=15\frac{60,000}{4,000} = 15. So the value of digit 6 is 15 times the value of digit 4. Choice (A) 6 incorrectly assumes you're comparing just the face values of the digits themselves (6 ÷ 4 = 1.5, which doesn't even match). Choice (B) 10 represents the common misconception that adjacent place values always differ by a factor of 10 – while place values themselves differ by 10, the actual digit values depend on what digits occupy those places. Choice (D) 20 might result from miscounting place values or calculation errors. Remember that place value questions require two steps: first identify each digit's actual value by considering its position, then perform the requested comparison. Don't get distracted by the digits' face values – a 2 in the hundreds place (200) has greater value than a 9 in the tens place (90). Always multiply each digit by its place value first.

Question 17

What is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by 88 and whose digits add up to 88?

  1. 40
  2. 56
  3. 64
  4. 80 (correct answer)

Explanation: This problem combines two conditions: divisibility by 8 and digit sum equals 8. When you encounter multi-condition problems like this, work systematically through possibilities, starting with the smallest candidates. To find the answer, you need numbers whose digits add to 8, then check which ones are divisible by 8. Start small and work up: 17 (digits: 1+7=8, but 17÷8=2.125), 26 (digits: 2+6=8, but 26÷8=3.25), 35 (digits: 3+5=8, but 35÷8=4.375), 44 (digits: 4+4=8, but 44÷8=5.5), 53 (digits: 5+3=8, but 53÷8=6.625), 62 (digits: 6+2=8, but 62÷8=7.75), 71 (digits: 7+1=8, but 71÷8=8.875), 80 (digits: 8+0=8, and 80÷8=10 exactly). So 80 is the smallest positive integer satisfying both conditions. Looking at the choices: A) 40 has digits that sum to 4+0=4, not 8. B) 56 has digits that sum to 5+6=11, not 8. C) 64 has digits that sum to 6+4=10, not 8. While B and C are divisible by 8, they fail the digit sum requirement. D) 80 satisfies both conditions: 8+0=8 and 80÷8=10. Remember that "smallest" problems require checking all possibilities up to your answer. Don't just verify that answer choices work—make sure no smaller number works first. Always double-check both conditions when dealing with multi-requirement problems.

Question 18

Which of the following is not a multiple of 7575?

  1. 225
  2. 300
  3. 425 (correct answer)
  4. 450

Explanation: When you encounter a question asking which number is "not" a multiple of another number, you need to check whether each choice can be evenly divided by the given number. A multiple of 75 means 75×n75 \times n for some whole number nn, or equivalently, a number that gives no remainder when divided by 75. Let's check each option by dividing by 75: For choice A: 225÷75=3225 \div 75 = 3 exactly, so 225 is a multiple of 75. For choice B: 300÷75=4300 \div 75 = 4 exactly, so 300 is a multiple of 75. For choice D: 450÷75=6450 \div 75 = 6 exactly, so 450 is a multiple of 75. For choice C: 425÷75=5.67...425 \div 75 = 5.67... or 5235\frac{2}{3}. Since this doesn't give a whole number, 425 is not a multiple of 75. We can verify this: 75×5=37575 \times 5 = 375 and 75×6=45075 \times 6 = 450, so 425 falls between these multiples. Choice C is correct because 425 cannot be expressed as 75×n75 \times n where nn is a whole number. The other choices (A, B, and D) are all actual multiples of 75, making them incorrect answers to this "not" question. Strategy tip: For "which is not" questions, systematically test each choice rather than trying to spot the answer. Also, remember that multiples of 75 must be multiples of both 25 and 3, which can sometimes provide a quicker check.

Question 19

Which of the following numbers has an 88 in the hundredths place and a 22 in the ten-thousandths place?

  1. 7.6832 (correct answer)
  2. 7.8632
  3. 7.6823
  4. 7.6283

Explanation: When you encounter decimal place value questions, you need to identify the specific position of each digit after the decimal point. The places go: tenths, hundredths, thousandths, ten-thousandths, and so on. Let's map out the decimal places for a number like 7.68327.6832:

  • 66 is in the tenths place (first digit after decimal)
  • 88 is in the hundredths place (second digit after decimal)
  • 33 is in the thousandths place (third digit after decimal)
  • 22 is in the ten-thousandths place (fourth digit after decimal)
We need a number with 88 in the hundredths place and 22 in the ten-thousandths place. Choice A (7.68327.6832) has 88 in the hundredths place and 22 in the ten-thousandths place—this matches perfectly. Choice B (7.86327.8632) has 88 in the tenths place (not hundredths) and 22 in the ten-thousandths place. The 88 is in the wrong position. Choice C (7.68237.6823) has 88 in the hundredths place correctly, but 33 in the ten-thousandths place instead of 22. Choice D (7.62837.6283) has 22 in the hundredths place (not 88) and 33 in the ten-thousandths place (not 22). Both required digits are in wrong positions. Remember this pattern: after the decimal point, count positions carefully—tenths (1st), hundredths (2nd), thousandths (3rd), ten-thousandths (4th). Many students mix up these place values, so always count from the decimal point when identifying positions.

Question 20

5!=1205! = 120. How many factors of 120120 are even?

  1. 8
  2. 10
  3. 12 (correct answer)
  4. 14

Explanation: When you encounter a question about finding factors with specific properties, you need to use prime factorization to systematically count them. First, find the prime factorization of 120. Since 5!=5×4×3×2×1=1205! = 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 120, we can write: 120=23×31×51120 = 2^3 \times 3^1 \times 5^1 To find all factors of 120, you combine the prime factors in every possible way. The total number of factors is (3+1)(1+1)(1+1)=16(3+1)(1+1)(1+1) = 16. For a factor to be even, it must contain at least one factor of 2. The even factors are those that include 212^1, 222^2, or 232^3 in their prime factorization. Count the even factors: For each even factor, you must choose at least one power of 2 (3 choices: 212^1, 222^2, or 232^3), any power of 3 (2 choices: 303^0 or 313^1), and any power of 5 (2 choices: 505^0 or 515^1). This gives us 3×2×2=123 \times 2 \times 2 = 12 even factors. Answer choice A) 8 likely comes from miscounting or using an incorrect method. Answer choice B) 10 might result from confusion about which combinations are valid. Answer choice D) 14 could come from incorrectly subtracting only 2 odd factors from the total 16, when there are actually 4 odd factors. Remember: To count factors with specific properties, use prime factorization and systematically consider all valid combinations of the prime powers.