What this quiz covers
This quiz focuses on Solve Ratio Problems, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for HSPT.
The cost to host a banquet is a fixed rental fee plus a per-guest charge. For 40 guests, the total cost is $2100. For 60 guests, the total cost is $2900. A budget of $4100 is set for a future banquet. If the per-guest charge is increased by 25% while the rental fee remains the same, what is the maximum number of guests that can be invited?
HSPT Quiz
Practice Solve Ratio Problems in HSPT with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
This quiz focuses on Solve Ratio Problems, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for HSPT.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
The cost to host a banquet is a fixed rental fee plus a per-guest charge. For 40 guests, the total cost is $2100. For 60 guests, the total cost is $2900. A budget of $4100 is set for a future banquet. If the per-guest charge is increased by 25% while the rental fee remains the same, what is the maximum number of guests that can be invited?
Explanation: This problem requires finding a linear relationship, then applying a change. Let F be the fixed fee and C be the per-guest charge. We have a system of two equations: 1) F+40C=2100 and 2) F+60C=2900. Subtracting equation (1) from (2) gives: (F+60C)−(F+40C)=2900−2100, which simplifies to 20C=800, so (C = 40\). Substitute C back into equation (1): F + 40(40) = 2100,soF + 1600 = 2100, which gives \(F = 500). Now, the per-guest charge is increased by 25%. The new charge, C', is (C' = 40 \times (1 + 0.25) = 40 \times 1.25 = 50\). The fixed fee F remains $500. The budget is $4100. Let G be the number of guests. The new cost equation is 500 + 50G = 4100.SolvingforG:50G = 4100 - 500,so50G = 3600.G = \frac{3600}{50} = 72$. The maximum number of guests is 72.
An inheritance is divided between a son and a daughter in the ratio 7:5. The son invests his entire share for two years at a 10% annual simple interest rate. The daughter invests her share for the same period at a 12% annual simple interest rate. After two years, what is the ratio of the total amount the son has to the total amount the daughter has?
Explanation: Let the son's share of the inheritance be 7k and the daughter's share be 5k for some constant k. The formula for the total amount after simple interest is A = P(1 + rt), where P is the principal, r is the annual rate, and t is the time in years. For the son: P = 7k, r = 10% = 0.10, t = 2 years. The son's total amount is Ason=7k(1+0.10×2)=7k(1+0.20)=7k(1.2)=8.4k. For the daughter: P = 5k, r = 12% = 0.12, t = 2 years. The daughter's total amount is Adaughter=5k(1+0.12×2)=5k(1+0.24)=5k(1.24)=6.2k. The ratio of the son's total amount to the daughter's total amount is 8.4k:6.2k. The k cancels out, leaving the ratio 8.4 : 6.2. To express this as a ratio of integers, multiply both parts by 10 to get 84 : 62. This ratio can be simplified by dividing both parts by their greatest common divisor, 2. The final simplified ratio is 42:31.
Two candles of the same height are lit at the same time. The first is consumed in 6 hours and the second in 4 hours. Assuming that each candle burns at a constant rate, in how many hours after being lit will the ratio of the height of the first candle to the second candle be 2:1?
Explanation: Let the initial height of both candles be H. The rate of burning for the first candle (C1) is H/6 per hour. The rate of burning for the second candle (C2) is H/4 per hour. Let 't' be the time in hours after they are lit. The height of C1 at time 't' is H1(t)=H−6Ht=H(1−6t). The height of C2 at time 't' is H2(t)=H−4Ht=H(1−4t). We want to find the time 't' when the ratio of their heights is 2:1, i.e., H2(t)H1(t)=12. Substituting the expressions for the heights: H(1−t/4)H(1−t/6)=2. The H terms cancel out: 1−6t=2(1−4t). Distribute the 2 on the right side: 1−6t=2−42t=2−2t. Now, solve for t. It's helpful to clear the denominators by multiplying the entire equation by the least common multiple of 6 and 2, which is 6. 6(1)−6(6t)=6(2)−6(2t). This gives 6−t=12−3t. Rearranging the terms to solve for t: 3t−t=12−6, which simplifies to 2t=6. Therefore, t=3 hours.
Two gears are connected such that their rotation speeds are inversely proportional to their radii. If gear A has radius 6 cm and rotates at 150 rpm, while gear B has radius 9 cm, and gear C is added such that all three gears maintain the inverse relationship, what must be the radius of gear C if it rotates at 75 rpm?
Explanation: When you encounter gear problems involving inverse proportionality, remember that as one quantity increases, the other decreases at a predictable rate. Here, rotation speed and radius have an inverse relationship, meaning speed×radius=constant for all connected gears. First, find the constant using gear A's information: 150 rpm×6 cm=900. You can verify this works for gear B: if its radius is 9 cm, then its speed should be 900÷9=100 rpm, which makes sense since larger gears rotate slower. For gear C rotating at 75 rpm, use the same constant: 75×rC=900, so rC=900÷75=12 cm. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A (18 cm) would give a speed of 900÷18=50 rpm, not 75 rpm. Choice C (15 cm) would result in 900÷15=60 rpm. Choice D (20 cm) would produce 900÷20=45 rpm. These represent common calculation errors or misunderstanding the inverse relationship. The answer is B) 12 cm. Study tip: For inverse proportion problems, always establish the constant first by multiplying the two given quantities. Then use this constant to find missing values. Watch for the key phrase "inversely proportional" – it signals that one value increases as the other decreases, and their product remains constant.
In a gear system, three gears A, B, and C have teeth in the ratio 12:16:20. If gear A makes 80 complete rotations, and the gears are connected such that adjacent gears rotate in opposite directions, how many rotations does gear C make, and in which direction relative to gear A?
Explanation: When you encounter gear system problems, remember two key principles: gears with more teeth rotate slower, and adjacent gears always rotate in opposite directions. First, let's find how many rotations gear C makes. In any gear system, the product of teeth and rotations remains constant. So if gear A (12 teeth) makes 80 rotations, we can write: 12×80=20×RC, where RC is gear C's rotations. Solving: RC=2012×80=20960=48 rotations. Next, we need to determine the direction. Since adjacent gears rotate in opposite directions, we must trace through the connections. Gear A connects to gear B (opposite direction), then gear B connects to gear C (opposite direction again). Two direction changes means gear C rotates in the same direction as gear A. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice B gives the correct number of rotations (48) but incorrectly states the direction as opposite to A. This ignores that there are two gear connections, not one. Choices C and D both incorrectly calculate 64 rotations, likely from using gear B's tooth count (16) in the calculation instead of gear C's count (20). Choice D compounds this error with the wrong direction as well. For gear problems, always set up the relationship that teeth times rotations equals a constant, and carefully count the number of gear connections to determine final direction. Each connection reverses the direction once.
A paint mixture requires red, blue, and yellow paint in the ratio 4:3:2. If a painter has 36 gallons of blue paint available and wants to use it all, how many gallons of red and yellow paint combined will be needed?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems, your key strategy is to find the scaling factor that connects the given information to the ratio. Here, the paint mixture uses red, blue, and yellow in the ratio 4:3:2, and you have 36 gallons of blue paint to use completely.
Since blue paint corresponds to the "3" in the ratio 4:3:2, you can set up the equation: 3x=36, where x is your scaling factor. Solving gives you x=12.
Now you can find the actual amounts needed:
This confirms answer A is correct.
Let's examine why the other answers are wrong:
Answer B (60 gallons) would result from incorrectly thinking the ratio parts for red and yellow are 3+2=5, then calculating 5×12=60. This misses that red requires 4 parts, not 3.
Answer C (54 gallons) might come from adding all three paint amounts incorrectly or using the wrong scaling factor.
Answer D (48 gallons) gives only the red paint amount, forgetting to include the yellow paint in the total.
Study tip: In ratio problems, always identify which part of the ratio corresponds to your given information, find the scaling factor by dividing, then multiply each ratio part by that factor. Double-check by ensuring your given quantity matches what you calculate.
In a basketball league, the ratio of wins to losses for Team A is 7:3, and for Team B it's 5:2. If Team A has played 40 games and Team B has played 35 games, which team has the better winning percentage and by how much?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems involving percentages, you need to convert the ratios into actual numbers of wins and losses, then calculate the winning percentage for each team. For Team A with a 7:3 win-to-loss ratio over 40 games: The ratio parts total 7+3=10. So Team A wins 107×40=28 games. Their winning percentage is 4028=0.70=70%. For Team B with a 5:2 win-to-loss ratio over 35 games: The ratio parts total 5+2=7. So Team B wins 75×35=25 games. Their winning percentage is 3525=75≈0.714=71.4%. Team B has the better winning percentage at 71.4% versus Team A's 70%, with a difference of 71.4%−70%=1.4%. Choice A correctly identifies this relationship. Choice B makes a statement error—it claims Team A has the better percentage but then shows Team B's percentage (71.4%) is actually higher than Team A's (70%). Choice C has the right percentages and comparison but calculates the wrong difference (2.4% instead of 1.4%). Choice D incorrectly calculates Team B's percentage as 68.6%, likely from a ratio misinterpretation. Study tip: Always convert ratios to actual numbers first, then calculate percentages. Double-check that your final comparison statement matches your calculated values—many wrong answers contain contradictory statements.
A gear system has three gears with teeth in the ratio 4:6:9. If the smallest gear makes 180 revolutions, how many revolutions do the other two gears make, and what is the total number of revolutions made by all three gears?
Explanation: Gear problems test your understanding of inverse relationships: when gears are connected, smaller gears turn faster than larger gears. The key insight is that all gears must move the same linear distance along their circumferences in the same time period. Since the gear teeth are in the ratio 4:6:9, the number of teeth determines each gear's circumference. When gears mesh, they cover equal arc lengths, so: (revolutions of gear 1) × (teeth of gear 1) = (revolutions of gear 2) × (teeth of gear 2). The smallest gear (4 teeth) makes 180 revolutions. For the medium gear (6 teeth): 180×4=revolutions×6, so 720=6×revolutions, giving us 120 revolutions. For the large gear (9 teeth): 180×4=revolutions×9, so 720=9×revolutions, giving us 80 revolutions. Total: 180+120+80=380 revolutions. Choice A correctly shows these calculations. Choice B incorrectly assumes the gears turn in the same direction as their size ratio (bigger gears turning more), which violates the physics of gear systems. Choice C uses the correct individual gear calculations but miscalculates the total as 280 instead of 380. Choice D combines the wrong individual calculations from choice B with an incorrect total. Remember: in gear systems, revolutions are inversely proportional to the number of teeth. Always multiply revolutions by teeth to find the constant, then divide by the other gear's teeth.
In a chemistry lab, three solutions must be mixed in the ratio 3:7:5 by volume. However, the available containers can only measure in increments of 25 mL. What is the smallest total volume of mixture that can be prepared using this ratio with the measuring constraint?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems with measurement constraints, you need to find the smallest actual volumes that maintain the given ratio while meeting the physical limitations. The ratio 3:7:5 means for every 3 parts of solution A, you need 7 parts of solution B and 5 parts of solution C. To find actual volumes, multiply each ratio part by the same factor k: 3k:7k:5k. Since containers only measure in 25 mL increments, each volume (3k, 7k, and 5k) must be divisible by 25. This means k itself must make each product divisible by 25. For 3k to be divisible by 25: since gcd(3,25)=1, we need k divisible by 25. For 7k to be divisible by 25: since gcd(7,25)=1, we need k divisible by 25. For 5k to be divisible by 25: since 5×5=25, we need k divisible by 5. The smallest k satisfying all conditions is k=25. This gives volumes: 3(25)=75 mL, 7(25)=175 mL, and 5(25)=125 mL. Total volume: 75+175+125=375 mL. Answer A (375 mL) is correct. Answer B (750 mL) uses k=50, which works but isn't minimal. Answer C (300 mL) doesn't maintain the ratio with 25 mL increments. Answer D (450 mL) also fails to satisfy both the ratio and measurement constraints. Remember: when ratios meet measurement constraints, find the least common multiple that makes each ratio component measurable.
A paint mixture requires red, blue, and yellow paint in the ratio 7:4:3. If the total volume of paint needed is 2.8 liters, but the painter only has 0.6 liters of blue paint available, what is the maximum volume of paint mixture that can be made using the correct ratio?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems with constraints, you need to identify which component limits your total mixture. The ratio 7:4:3 tells you that for every 7 parts red, you need 4 parts blue and 3 parts yellow, totaling 14 parts. First, determine how much mixture you could make if blue paint is your limiting factor. With 0.6 liters of blue paint representing 4 parts of the ratio, each part equals 0.6÷4=0.15 liters. Therefore, the maximum total mixture is 14×0.15=2.1 liters, which is answer A. Let's see why the other answers miss the mark. Answer B (1.8 liters) incorrectly assumes each part is 1.8÷14=0.129 liters, which would only require 4×0.129=0.514 liters of blue paint—but you have 0.6 liters available, so this underuses your constraint. Answer C (2.4 liters) makes the error of assuming you can use the full 2.8 liters mentioned in the problem, ignoring that the blue paint limitation prevents this. Answer D (1.5 liters) seems to assume each part equals 1.5÷14=0.107 liters, which would need only 0.429 liters of blue paint, again underutilizing what's available. Remember this key strategy: in constrained ratio problems, always identify your limiting component first, then work backward to find the maximum total. The component with the smallest available amount relative to its ratio requirement determines your ceiling.
A machine produces widgets at rates proportional to 3:4:5 for its three production lines. In an 8-hour shift, the total production is 2400 widgets. Due to maintenance, the second production line operates at only 75% efficiency for the next 6-hour shift. How many widgets will be produced in this 6-hour shift?
Explanation: When you encounter problems involving proportional rates and changing conditions, break them down into clear steps: find the individual rates, then apply any efficiency changes.
First, let's determine each production line's rate during the normal 8-hour shift. The lines operate in a 3:4:5 ratio, totaling 3+4+5=12 parts. With 2400 total widgets, each part represents 2400÷12=200 widgets. So the hourly rates are:
For the 6-hour shift with Line 2 at 75% efficiency:
This confirms answer A is correct.
Answer B (1575) likely results from incorrectly applying the 75% efficiency to all three lines instead of just Line 2. Answer C (1725) might come from miscalculating the reduced efficiency as 85% instead of 75%. Answer D (1800) represents production if all lines operated at full capacity for 6 hours, ignoring the maintenance issue entirely.
Study tip: In multi-step proportion problems, always verify your ratios add up correctly and double-check which specific conditions (like efficiency changes) apply to which parts of the system.
A photo is enlarged so that the ratio of the new area to the original area is 25:4. If the original photo was 6 inches wide, what is the width of the enlarged photo, and what is the ratio of the new perimeter to the original perimeter?
Explanation: When you see questions about enlarging or scaling geometric figures, remember that area scales with the square of the linear scale factor, while perimeter scales directly with the linear scale factor. Since the area ratio is 25:4, you need to find the linear scale factor first. Because area scales as the square of linear dimensions, if the linear scale factor is k, then k2=425. Taking the square root: k=25=2.5. For the new width: multiply the original width by the scale factor. The original width was 6 inches, so the new width is 6×2.5=15 inches. For the perimeter ratio: since perimeter is a linear measurement, it scales directly with the linear scale factor. Therefore, the perimeter ratio is 5:2. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice B gives the correct width but incorrectly uses the area ratio (25:4) for the perimeter ratio. This is a common mistake—forgetting that perimeter scales linearly, not quadratically. Choice C calculates the new width as 6×425=37.5 inches, incorrectly applying the area ratio directly to a linear dimension. Choice D makes both errors: using the area ratio for both the width calculation and the perimeter ratio. Study tip: Always identify whether you're working with linear measurements (length, width, perimeter) or area measurements. Linear measurements scale with the scale factor k, while areas scale with k2. When given an area ratio, take its square root to find the linear scale factor.
The ratio of the areas of two similar triangles is 9:16. If the perimeter of the smaller triangle is 24 cm, what is the perimeter of the larger triangle?
Explanation: When working with similar triangles, you need to understand the relationship between different types of measurements. Similar triangles have the same shape but different sizes, which creates predictable ratios between corresponding parts. The key insight is that while areas have a squared relationship to linear dimensions, perimeters have a direct linear relationship. If two similar triangles have corresponding sides in the ratio a:b, then their perimeters are also in the ratio a:b, but their areas are in the ratio a2:b2. Since the area ratio is 9:16, you need to find the ratio of corresponding linear dimensions. Taking the square root of both parts: 9:16=3:4. This 3:4 ratio applies to all linear measurements, including perimeters. If the smaller triangle's perimeter is 24 cm and the perimeter ratio is 3:4, then: x24=43, where x is the larger triangle's perimeter. Cross-multiplying: 3x=96, so x=32 cm. Answer A gives the correct numerical result but incorrectly states that perimeter ratios equal area ratios. Answer C incorrectly uses the area ratio 9:16 directly for perimeters, calculating 24×916=42.67 cm, and compounds this by claiming perimeters equal area ratios. Answer D uses the same incorrect calculation as C but correctly identifies the 3:4 ratio relationship. Remember: for similar figures, linear measurements (like perimeter) relate by taking the square root of the area ratio. Always convert area ratios to linear ratios first.
A contractor mixes concrete using cement, sand, and gravel in the ratio 1:3:4. For a large job, he needs to make 120 cubic yards of concrete, but his supplier can only deliver sand in 10-cubic-yard increments. What is the minimum amount of sand he should order, and how much total concrete can he make with that amount?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems with real-world constraints, you need to work backwards from the limiting factor rather than the total amount needed. The concrete ratio is 1:3:4 (cement:sand:gravel), meaning for every 8 total parts, 3 parts are sand. To make exactly 120 cubic yards, you'd need 120×83=45 cubic yards of sand. However, sand only comes in 10-cubic-yard increments, so you must round up to 50 cubic yards to have enough material. With 50 cubic yards of sand, you can determine the maximum concrete possible. Since sand represents 3 parts out of 8 total parts, you can make 50×38=133.33 cubic yards of concrete. This confirms answer A is correct. Answer B incorrectly calculates the total concrete as 130 cubic yards, likely from a rounding error in the ratio calculation. Answer C suggests ordering only 40 cubic yards of sand, but this falls short of the 45 cubic yards needed for 120 cubic yards of concrete. Answer D makes the impossible claim that 40 cubic yards of sand can produce 120 cubic yards of concrete, which violates the given ratio entirely. Strategy tip: In ratio problems with quantity constraints, always identify which component has the restriction, then work backwards to find the maximum possible output. Don't assume you can make exactly what's "needed" when real-world limitations apply.
Two similar polygons have perimeters in the ratio 3:5. The sum of their areas is 544 square centimeters. What is the area of the larger polygon?
Explanation: The ratio of the perimeters of two similar polygons is equal to the ratio of their corresponding sides. Let this ratio be s1:s2=3:5. The ratio of the areas of two similar polygons is the square of the ratio of their corresponding sides. So, the ratio of the areas is A1:A2=(s1)2:(s2)2=32:52=9:25. Let the areas be 9x and 25x. The sum of the areas is given as 544 sq cm. So, 9x+25x=544. This simplifies to 34x=544. Solving for x, we get x=34544=16. The area of the larger polygon is 25x. Therefore, the area is 25×16=400 square centimeters.
A recipe calls for milk and water in the ratio 2 : 7. If 1.5 cups of milk are used, how many cups of water are needed?
Explanation: When you see a ratio problem, you're working with proportional relationships where the quantities maintain a constant relationship to each other. Here, milk and water must always be in the ratio 2:7, meaning for every 2 parts milk, you need 7 parts water. To solve this, set up a proportion. If the ratio is 2:7 (milk to water), then 72=x1.5, where x is the cups of water needed. Cross multiply: 2x=7×1.5=10.5. Therefore, x=5.25 cups of water. You can verify this: 5.251.5=72 when you simplify both fractions to 72. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A (3.75) comes from incorrectly setting up the proportion as 52=x1.5 - this treats the ratio as 2:5 instead of 2:7. Choice B (4.5) results from multiplying 1.5 by 3, which would be correct if the ratio were 1:3 instead of 2:7. Choice D (6.0) comes from simply multiplying 1.5 by 4, showing a misunderstanding of how ratios work. Remember: in ratio problems, always set up your proportion carefully with the correct corresponding parts. Double-check by verifying that your answer maintains the original ratio when you divide the quantities you found.
Two printers working together can print 120 pages in 8 minutes. Printer A prints pages at a rate 3 : 2 compared with Printer B. How many pages does Printer B print in 8 minutes?
Explanation: When you encounter work rate problems involving multiple workers with different speeds, you need to break down the total work based on their individual rates and then distribute accordingly.
Start by finding the combined rate: 120 pages in 8 minutes means they print 8120=15 pages per minute together.
The key insight is interpreting the ratio. "Printer A prints at a rate 3:2 compared with Printer B" means for every 3 pages A prints, B prints 2 pages. This creates a total ratio of 3+2=5 parts.
Since they work together at 15 pages per minute, you can find each printer's individual rate:
Over 8 minutes, Printer B prints: 6×8=48 pages.
Looking at the wrong answers: B) 60 represents half the total pages, ignoring the different rates. C) 72 comes from incorrectly giving Printer B the larger share (53×120=72). D) 90 results from confusion about the ratio direction, calculating as if B were much faster than A.
For ratio problems, always identify what the ratio represents, determine the total parts, then calculate each individual share. Watch out for ratio direction—"A compared to B at 3:2" means A gets 3 parts, B gets 2 parts.
On a map, 1 inch represents 12 miles. If two cities are 3.5 inches apart on the map, what is their actual distance in miles?
Explanation: Map scale problems test your ability to use proportional reasoning to convert between map measurements and real-world distances. When you see a scale like "1 inch represents 12 miles," you're looking at a ratio that stays constant across the entire map. To find the actual distance, set up a proportion using the given scale. Since 1 inch on the map equals 12 miles in reality, you can write this as 12 miles1 inch=x miles3.5 inches. Cross-multiplying gives you 1×x=12×3.5, so x=42 miles. Alternatively, you can think of this as a simple multiplication: if each inch represents 12 miles, then 3.5 inches represents 3.5×12=42 miles. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A (30) might result from incorrectly calculating 3.5×8 or making an arithmetic error. Choice B (36) could come from multiplying 3.5×10 instead of 12, possibly misremembering the scale. Choice D (48) might occur if you mistakenly thought the scale was 1 inch = 13.7 miles, or made an error in your multiplication. Study tip: For map scale problems, always identify the scale ratio first, then multiply the map distance by the scale factor. Double-check your arithmetic since these problems often include answer choices that result from common calculation mistakes. Practice recognizing that "1 inch represents X miles" means you multiply map inches by X to get real miles.
A bag of mixed nuts contains almonds, cashews, and peanuts in the ratio 7 : 3 : 5 by weight. If the bag holds 3.15 kg of nuts, how many kilograms of cashews are in the bag?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems with a given total, you need to find what fraction each part represents of the whole. The ratio 7 : 3 : 5 tells you the relative weights of almonds, cashews, and peanuts respectively. First, find the total ratio parts: 7+3+5=15 parts total. This means cashews represent 153=51 of the total weight. To find the weight of cashews, multiply this fraction by the total weight: 51×3.15=0.63 kg. This confirms answer choice B is correct. Let's examine why the other answers are wrong: A) 0.45 kg would result if you mistakenly calculated 203×3.15, perhaps by incorrectly adding the ratio parts or making an arithmetic error. C) 0.90 kg represents a calculation error where you might have found 10.53×3.15 or confused the setup entirely. D) 1.05 kg would result from calculating 31×3.15, which treats the ratio as if cashews were one-third of the total instead of 3 out of 15 parts. Remember this key strategy for ratio problems: always add up all the ratio parts first to find your denominator, then use the specific part you want as your numerator. The fraction sum of all partspart you want times the total quantity gives you your answer. Double-check by verifying that all parts add up to the given total.
At a school, the ratio of freshmen to sophomores to juniors is 6 : 5 : 4. If there are 150 sophomores, how many total students are in these three classes combined?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems, you're working with proportional relationships between different groups. The key insight is that ratios tell you the relative sizes of groups, and you can use any known quantity to find the others. Given the ratio 6:5:4 for freshmen:sophomores:juniors, this means that for every 5 sophomores, there are 6 freshmen and 4 juniors. Since you know there are 150 sophomores, you can find the ratio multiplier. If the ratio calls for 5 sophomores but you actually have 150, then 150÷5=30. This means each part of the ratio represents 30 students. Therefore: freshmen = 6×30=180, sophomores = 5×30=150 (which confirms our calculation), and juniors = 4×30=120. The total is 180+150+120=450 students. Looking at the wrong answers: (A) 390 likely comes from miscalculating the ratio multiplier or making an arithmetic error in the final addition. (C) 480 might result from incorrectly treating 150 as corresponding to a different part of the ratio, perhaps thinking it represents the "6" portion instead of the "5" portion. (D) 525 could come from adding 150 to each ratio number (6+5+4=15, then 15×150÷something) or another fundamental misunderstanding of how ratios work. Remember: in ratio problems, always identify which quantity corresponds to which part of the ratio, then find the multiplier to scale up the entire ratio proportionally.