MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems Quiz: 1b Genetic Code Codon Translation
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
1b Genetic Code Codon TranslationQuestion 1 of 20

In a bacterial expression study, a single-base substitution changed codon 12 in an enzyme mRNA from 5'-GAA-3' to 5'-GAG-3'. Protein yield and enzymatic activity were unchanged across replicates. A lab note lists the relevant code: GAA → Glu, GAG → Glu. Based on the information, which conclusion is most consistent with codon redundancy during translation?

The substitution is synonymous and preserves the encoded amino acid, so primary structure is unchanged at position 12
The substitution introduces a premature stop codon, truncating the enzyme at residue 12
The substitution changes the anticodon sequence in the tRNA gene, altering tRNA charging specificity
The substitution forces the ribosome to read the mRNA in a different reading frame downstream of codon 12
← Back to quizzes

MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems Quiz

MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems Quiz: 1b Genetic Code Codon Translation

Practice 1b Genetic Code Codon Translation in MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on 1b Genetic Code Codon Translation, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

In a bacterial expression study, a single-base substitution changed codon 12 in an enzyme mRNA from 5'-GAA-3' to 5'-GAG-3'. Protein yield and enzymatic activity were unchanged across replicates. A lab note lists the relevant code: GAA → Glu, GAG → Glu. Based on the information, which conclusion is most consistent with codon redundancy during translation?

  1. The substitution is synonymous and preserves the encoded amino acid, so primary structure is unchanged at position 12 (correct answer)
  2. The substitution introduces a premature stop codon, truncating the enzyme at residue 12
  3. The substitution changes the anticodon sequence in the tRNA gene, altering tRNA charging specificity
  4. The substitution forces the ribosome to read the mRNA in a different reading frame downstream of codon 12

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically codon redundancy. The genetic code is degenerate, meaning multiple codons can encode the same amino acid, often differing only in the third base due to wobble pairing. In this bacterial expression study, the single-base substitution changes codon 12 from GAA to GAG, both of which encode glutamate. Therefore, the substitution is synonymous, preserving the encoded amino acid and leaving the primary structure unchanged at position 12, as stated in choice A. Choice B fails because neither codon is a stop codon, reflecting a misconception that any base change introduces premature termination. To apply similar reasoning in future contexts, always reference a codon table to determine if a mutation alters the amino acid. Additionally, consider that while synonymous mutations do not change the protein sequence, they may subtly affect translation efficiency depending on codon usage.

Question 2

A point mutation in a human coding sequence changes 5'-UCU-3' to 5'-UCA-3' at codon 85. The protein sequence is unchanged in targeted proteomics. A lab reference lists: UCU → Ser; UCA → Ser. Based on the information, which conclusion is most consistent with codon redundancy?

  1. The mutation is silent at the amino acid level because both codons encode serine (correct answer)
  2. The mutation is a nonsense mutation because UCA is a stop codon
  3. The mutation must alter the tRNA amino acid attached because codon changes change aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase specificity
  4. The mutation changes the mRNA to be read 3'→5', reversing the peptide sequence

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically codon redundancy. The code's degeneracy allows multiple codons to specify the same amino acid, often via third-base variations. In this human coding sequence, the mutation changes UCU to UCA, both encoding serine. The mutation is silent, preserving the protein sequence as shown by proteomics, consistent with choice A. Choice B fails by misidentifying UCA as a stop codon, confusing it with UGA or others. To apply this, use a codon table to verify amino acid identity. Remember silent mutations may affect splicing or stability but not sequence.

Question 3

A mitochondrial gene is sequenced from a patient sample. A variant changes a codon in the middle of the open reading frame from 5'-UAU-3' to 5'-UAC-3'. The peptide sequence around this site is unchanged by mass spectrometry. A note in the sequencing report states: UAU → Tyr; UAC → Tyr. Based on the information, which conclusion is most consistent with codon redundancy?

  1. The variant is synonymous at the protein level because both codons specify tyrosine (correct answer)
  2. The variant necessarily changes the reading frame because it alters the second base of the codon
  3. The variant must change the amino acid because every amino acid is encoded by exactly one codon
  4. The variant prevents translation initiation because UAC is recognized only as a start codon

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically codon redundancy. Redundancy means synonymous codons encode the same amino acid, preserving protein sequence despite nucleotide changes. In this mitochondrial gene, the variant changes UAU to UAC, both encoding tyrosine. The variant is thus synonymous, explaining the unchanged peptide sequence by mass spectrometry, per choice A. Choice B fails by assuming a reading frame shift, ignoring that point mutations do not alter frame. To reason similarly, confirm both codons map to the same amino acid. Note that mitochondrial codes may vary slightly from standard.

Question 4

A bacterial gene was engineered so that a single codon in the coding region changed from 5'-UAU-3' to 5'-UAA-3'. In vitro translation produced a truncated polypeptide, and adding more aminoacyl-tRNAs did not restore full-length product. The team suspects the mutation altered a key genetic code signal rather than tRNA availability. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. Insertion of one nucleotide caused a reading-frame shift that can be corrected by increasing tRNA concentration
  2. A missense mutation replaced tyrosine with phenylalanine, shortening the protein by destabilizing it post-translationally
  3. A nonsense mutation introduced a stop codon, causing premature termination at that position (correct answer)
  4. A silent mutation occurred because UAU and UAA both encode tyrosine due to redundancy

Explanation: This question tests knowledge of nonsense mutations and their effects on translation termination. The genetic code includes three stop codons (UAA, UAG, UGA) that signal translation termination, and UAU codes for tyrosine. In this bacterial system, the mutation from UAU to UAA introduces a premature stop codon, causing the ribosome to terminate translation early and produce a truncated protein. The correct answer C properly identifies this as a nonsense mutation causing premature termination. Answer D incorrectly claims that both UAU and UAA encode tyrosine, when UAA is actually a stop codon, while answer B suggests post-translational effects rather than the direct translational consequence of a stop codon. When analyzing codon changes, always check if the new codon is a stop signal (UAA, UAG, or UGA) as these will terminate translation regardless of tRNA availability.

Question 5

Researchers observed that a single tRNA species in a mitochondria-like translation system could support incorporation of alanine at both 5'-GCU-3' and 5'-GCC-3' codons, even though only one alanine tRNA was detected by sequencing. The anticodon was reported as 3'-CGI-5' (I = inosine). The group proposes that flexible pairing at the third codon position explains the observation. Which mechanism explains the observed translation process?

  1. Strict Watson–Crick pairing at all three positions forces the same tRNA to recognize only one codon
  2. Wobble pairing allows inosine in the anticodon to pair with multiple bases at the codon's third position, enabling recognition of both codons (correct answer)
  3. The ribosome edits the mRNA sequence during elongation so that both codons become identical before tRNA binding
  4. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase changes alanine into a different amino acid depending on whether the codon is GCU or GCC

Explanation: This question tests understanding of wobble base pairing and how it enables genetic code degeneracy during translation. The wobble hypothesis explains that non-Watson-Crick pairing can occur at the third codon position, allowing a single tRNA to recognize multiple codons for the same amino acid. In this mitochondrial-like system, the tRNA with anticodon 3'-CGI-5' (where I is inosine) can pair with both GCU and GCC codons because inosine can form stable base pairs with multiple nucleotides (U, C, or A) at the wobble position. The correct answer B accurately describes this wobble pairing mechanism. Answer A incorrectly suggests strict Watson-Crick pairing at all positions, which would prevent one tRNA from recognizing multiple codons, while answer C proposes an impossible mRNA editing mechanism during elongation. To identify wobble pairing scenarios, look for inosine in anticodons or situations where one tRNA recognizes multiple synonymous codons differing only at the third position.

Question 6

In a reconstituted translation experiment, an mRNA segment contained the codons 5'-AUG-3' followed by 5'-UUU-3'. When the initiator tRNA was omitted, no peptide product was detected, even though all elongator tRNAs and amino acids were present. When the initiator tRNA was restored, translation proceeded normally. The researchers propose that a specific codon–tRNA interaction is required to establish the reading frame. Which mechanism explains the observed translation process?

  1. Elongator tRNAs can initiate at any codon, so omission of initiator tRNA should not affect peptide synthesis
  2. Initiation requires pairing of an initiator tRNA with the start codon to position the ribosome and set the reading frame for elongation (correct answer)
  3. Initiation occurs only after the ribosome synthesizes the first peptide bond, so initiator tRNA is unnecessary
  4. The start codon is recognized by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases rather than by tRNA anticodons, so initiator tRNA omission should not matter

Explanation: This question tests understanding of translation initiation and the special role of initiator tRNA in establishing the reading frame. Translation initiation requires specific recognition of the start codon (AUG) by initiator tRNA (carrying N-formylmethionine in bacteria or methionine in eukaryotes) to properly position the ribosome and establish the correct reading frame for subsequent elongation. Without initiator tRNA, the ribosome cannot properly assemble at the start codon or begin synthesis, even if all elongator tRNAs are present. The correct answer B explains this requirement for initiator tRNA-start codon pairing to set the reading frame. Answer A incorrectly suggests elongator tRNAs can substitute for initiator tRNA, ignoring their distinct structural features and ribosomal binding properties, while answer C reverses the order of events in translation initiation. To understand translation initiation, remember that the initiator tRNA-AUG interaction is essential for ribosome positioning and cannot be replaced by elongator tRNAs.

Question 7

A point mutation was introduced into an mRNA such that the coding sequence changed from 5'-AUG UCU GGC-3' to 5'-AUG UCC GGC-3'. In a purified translation system, the resulting polypeptide had the same length and identical amino acid composition compared with wild type. The researchers conclude the mutation did not change the encoded amino acid at that position. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. A nonsense mutation occurred because UCC is a stop codon, but translation continued due to wobble
  2. A frameshift mutation occurred because a base substitution changes the reading frame downstream
  3. A missense mutation occurred because UCU encodes glycine while UCC encodes serine
  4. A synonymous mutation occurred because UCU and UCC encode the same amino acid, preserving the peptide sequence (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests recognition of synonymous mutations in the genetic code during translation. The genetic code shows that both UCU and UCC encode serine, making this a synonymous (silent) mutation that preserves the amino acid sequence. In the given mRNA sequence, the change from UCU to UCC maintains serine at the second position, resulting in an identical polypeptide (Met-Ser-Gly). The correct answer D properly identifies this as a synonymous mutation preserving the peptide sequence. Answer C incorrectly assigns different amino acids to these codons (both encode serine, not glycine), while answer B wrongly suggests a frameshift from a simple substitution mutation. To verify synonymous mutations, use the genetic code table to confirm both the original and mutant codons encode the same amino acid, and remember that such mutations can still affect translation kinetics despite producing identical proteins.

Question 8

A synthetic biology team designed an mRNA with repeated glycine codons. When they replaced several 5'-GGU-3' codons with 5'-GGA-3' codons, the amino acid sequence remained glycine at those positions, but the ribosome pause frequency increased at the modified region. tRNA quantification showed that the tRNA decoding 5'-GGA-3' was less abundant than the tRNA decoding 5'-GGU-3'. Based on the information, which conclusion is most consistent with codon redundancy?

  1. The increased pausing is most consistent with a change in amino acid identity from glycine to glutamate
  2. The increased pausing is most consistent with synonymous codons being translated at different rates due to differences in available tRNAs (correct answer)
  3. The increased pausing is most consistent with the ribosome requiring perfect matching at the third base and rejecting all GGA codons
  4. The increased pausing is most consistent with GGA being a stop codon that triggers termination and reinitiation

Explanation: This question tests understanding of how synonymous codon usage affects translation kinetics through tRNA availability. Both GGU and GGA encode glycine due to genetic code degeneracy, but they are decoded by different tRNAs that may vary in cellular abundance. When the less abundant tRNA (decoding GGA) is required, the ribosome must wait longer for the correct aminoacyl-tRNA to arrive, causing increased pausing without changing the amino acid sequence. The correct answer B correctly identifies that synonymous codons can be translated at different rates based on tRNA availability. Answer A incorrectly suggests an amino acid change when both codons encode glycine, while answer D wrongly claims GGA is a stop codon. To analyze translation efficiency, remember that even synonymous codons can have dramatically different translation rates depending on the matching tRNA concentrations in the cell.

Question 9

A virology group introduced a point mutation into a viral coding sequence that changed 5'-UGG-3' to 5'-UGA-3'. In infected cells, the major translation product was truncated, but a low level of full-length protein was still detected. The group notes that the host has near-cognate tRNAs that occasionally insert an amino acid at stop codons (readthrough). Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. A missense mutation changed tryptophan to glycine, and full-length protein reflects compensatory splicing
  2. A nonsense mutation introduced a stop codon; occasional readthrough can produce low amounts of full-length protein (correct answer)
  3. A synonymous mutation occurred because UGG and UGA both encode tryptophan, but yield differs due to codon bias
  4. A frameshift mutation occurred because a single-base substitution shifts the reading frame, and readthrough restores it

Explanation: This question tests knowledge of nonsense mutations and stop codon readthrough during translation. The mutation from UGG (tryptophan) to UGA creates a stop codon, which normally terminates translation to produce a truncated protein. However, some near-cognate tRNAs can occasionally decode stop codons through imperfect base pairing (readthrough), allowing translation to continue and produce full-length protein at low levels. The correct answer B properly identifies this as a nonsense mutation with readthrough explaining the full-length protein. Answer C incorrectly claims UGA encodes tryptophan when it's actually a stop codon, while answer D mischaracterizes a simple substitution as causing a frameshift. When analyzing mutations to or from UGA, UAG, or UAA, recognize these as stop codons that terminate translation, but remember that readthrough can occur at low frequency in certain cellular contexts.

Question 10

During analysis of a mutant bacterial strain, a single-base deletion was found early in a coding region. Ribosome profiling showed normal initiation at the start codon but widespread changes in ribosome density downstream, and the detected protein product was markedly shorter and had an altered C-terminus compared with wild type. The mutation did not create a new promoter or affect mRNA abundance. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. A synonymous substitution changed one codon to another for the same amino acid, primarily affecting translation speed
  2. A frameshift altered the reading frame, changing downstream codons and increasing the likelihood of encountering a premature stop codon (correct answer)
  3. A missense mutation changed one amino acid but preserved the downstream reading frame and protein length
  4. A wobble interaction at the first codon position allowed the ribosome to maintain the original reading frame after the deletion

Explanation: This question tests understanding of frameshift mutations and their consequences for translation and the genetic code. A single-base deletion disrupts the reading frame, causing all downstream codons to be read incorrectly from the deletion point onward, typically resulting in a completely different amino acid sequence and often encountering a premature stop codon. In this bacterial strain, the frameshift explains both the altered ribosome density pattern (reflecting changed codon usage) and the shorter protein with altered C-terminus (due to encountering an out-of-frame stop codon). The correct answer B accurately describes the frameshift effect and its consequences. Answer A incorrectly describes a synonymous substitution which wouldn't cause the observed changes, while answer D misapplies the concept of wobble pairing which cannot compensate for frameshifts. When analyzing deletion or insertion mutations, remember that any change not divisible by three will shift the reading frame and dramatically alter all downstream translation.

Question 11

A researcher observes that one tRNA species can decode the codons 5'-CUU-3', 5'-CUC-3', and 5'-CUA-3' (all Leu), but not 5'-CUG-3'. The anticodon is 3'-GAI-5' (I = inosine) at the wobble position. Which mechanism best explains this pattern, consistent with wobble pairing rules?

  1. The ribosome changes CUG into CUA via RNA editing during elongation, enabling decoding
  2. Inosine pairs only with G, so it should decode CUG but not CUU/CUC/CUA
  3. Wobble occurs at the first base of the codon, so third-base differences should not matter
  4. Inosine at the anticodon wobble position can pair with U, C, or A in the codon third position, but not G (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically wobble pairing rules. Wobble allows inosine in the anticodon to pair with U, C, or A, but not G, in the codon's third position. In this observation, the tRNA with 3'-GAI-5' decodes CUU, CUC, CUA but not CUG (all leucine). Inosine pairs with U, C, A but not G, explaining the pattern, as in choice D. Choice B fails by stating inosine pairs only with G, inverting the actual wobble rules. For application, list possible pairings for modified bases like inosine. Predict tRNA decoding range based on anticodon composition.

Question 12

A bacterial strain is engineered to remove a specific tRNA that normally recognizes the arginine codon 5'-AGA-3'. The arginine content of proteins remains similar, but ribosome profiling shows pauses specifically at AGA sites; other arginine codons show minimal pausing. Which conclusion is most consistent with codon redundancy and translation?

  1. Arginine can still be incorporated at other arginine codons, but loss of the AGA-decoding tRNA slows translation specifically at AGA sites (correct answer)
  2. Pausing cannot be codon-specific because all arginine codons are decoded by the same tRNA
  3. Loss of a tRNA removes arginine entirely from translation because redundancy does not exist for amino acids
  4. Pausing indicates that the ribosome reads mRNA as amino acids directly, without tRNAs

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically redundancy and tRNA specificity. Redundancy allows multiple tRNAs to decode synonymous codons for the same amino acid, so losing one may slow but not eliminate incorporation. In this engineered strain, removing the AGA-specific tRNA causes pauses at AGA but not other arginine codons. Arginine is still incorporated via other codons, but AGA sites slow due to tRNA loss, per choice A. Choice B fails by assuming one tRNA decodes all synonyms, denying multiplicity. To reason, review tRNA isoacceptors per amino acid. Analyze pausing against tRNA gene deletions.

Question 13

A coding sequence begins 5'-AUG GCU GCU GCU-3'. A point mutation changes the second codon from GCU to ACU. The lab note lists: GCU → Ala; ACU → Thr. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. No change in amino acid occurs because the mutation is in the wobble position
  2. A missense mutation substitutes threonine for alanine at residue 2, potentially altering protein function (correct answer)
  3. A nonsense mutation introduces a stop codon at residue 2, truncating the protein
  4. A frameshift occurs because any base substitution changes the triplet grouping

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically missense mutations. Missense mutations change the codon to specify a different amino acid, potentially altering protein function. In this coding sequence, the mutation shifts the second codon from GCU (alanine) to ACU (threonine). This results in a missense substitution of threonine for alanine at residue 2, as in choice B. Choice A fails by claiming no change due to wobble, ignoring that the mutation affects the first base, not just the third. To check similarly, map both original and mutant codons to amino acids. Consider how amino acid properties might affect protein structure.

Question 14

An mRNA segment in a eukaryotic cell is 5'-AUG AAA UGG GCU-3'. A mutation changes the third codon from UGG to UGA. The resulting protein is shorter and lacks downstream domains. Which effect is most consistent with this described mutation on protein synthesis?

  1. A missense substitution occurs at codon 3, changing tryptophan to glycine but preserving length
  2. A nonsense mutation introduces a stop codon, terminating translation prematurely at codon 3 (correct answer)
  3. A silent mutation occurs at codon 3 because UGG and UGA both encode tryptophan
  4. A frameshift occurs because a single-base substitution always shifts the reading frame

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically the effects of mutations on codon function. Mutations in codons can lead to nonsense changes if they create stop codons, halting translation prematurely. In this eukaryotic mRNA segment, the mutation alters the third codon from UGG (tryptophan) to UGA (stop). This introduces a nonsense mutation, terminating translation at codon 3 and producing a shorter protein lacking downstream domains, consistent with choice B. Choice A fails by misidentifying it as a missense mutation to glycine, confusing UGA with a sense codon. For transferable reasoning, identify if a codon change matches a stop codon in the genetic code table. Additionally, consider how nonsense mutations often lead to truncated, nonfunctional proteins.

Question 15

In a cell-free system, translation begins at AUG and a peptide is elongated by repeated cycles of A-site tRNA entry, peptide bond formation, and translocation. When GTP is depleted, ribosomes accumulate with a peptidyl-tRNA in the P site and an empty A site. Which mechanism explains the observed translation process most consistently?

  1. GTP depletion increases wobble pairing, causing the A site to remain empty due to reduced specificity
  2. GTP depletion prevents codon-anticodon base pairing because pairing requires phosphate bonds from GTP
  3. GTP depletion converts sense codons into stop codons, causing release factor binding in the A site
  4. GTP hydrolysis is required for elongation factor–mediated delivery of aminoacyl-tRNA and/or translocation, so depletion stalls elongation (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically energy requirements in elongation. GTP hydrolysis powers elongation factor functions, including tRNA delivery and translocation during translation. In this cell-free system, GTP depletion halts elongation with peptidyl-tRNA in the P site and empty A site. GTP is required for elongation factor-mediated steps, stalling translation upon depletion, as in choice D. Choice B fails by claiming GTP is needed for base pairing, misconstruing that pairing is hydrogen bond-based, not GTP-dependent. For transferable checks, recall GTP roles in EF-Tu and EF-G. Consider how energy depletion affects specific translation stages.

Question 16

A gene editing experiment introduces a single-nucleotide insertion immediately after the start codon in a coding sequence. Western blot shows a markedly smaller protein, and sequencing of the mRNA confirms the insertion is retained. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. Translation initiates at the insertion site rather than AUG, producing a normal-length protein with altered N-terminus
  2. A synonymous change occurs because insertions do not affect codon grouping in triplets
  3. Only one amino acid is added while the remaining sequence is unchanged, because the ribosome compensates for insertions
  4. A frameshift alters downstream codons and often creates an early stop codon, truncating the protein (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically frameshift mutations. Insertions or deletions can shift the reading frame, altering downstream codons and often introducing early stops. In this gene editing experiment, a single-nucleotide insertion after the start codon disrupts the triplet grouping. This frameshift alters downstream codons and likely creates an early stop, truncating the protein as seen on Western blot, per choice D. Choice C fails by suggesting only one amino acid is added without frame change, ignoring that insertions disrupt the entire reading frame. For future checks, count nucleotides post-mutation to assess frame integrity. Consider that frameshifts typically have more severe effects than point mutations.

Question 17

A single-nucleotide substitution converts codon 7 of a bacterial protein from 5'-CAA-3' to 5'-UAA-3'. The resulting polypeptide is nearly undetectable. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. A missense mutation changes glutamine to histidine while maintaining full-length translation
  2. A synonymous mutation occurs because CAA and UAA both encode glutamine
  3. A frameshift occurs because a substitution adds one nucleotide to the mRNA
  4. A nonsense mutation introduces a stop codon early in the open reading frame, yielding a truncated product that may be unstable (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically nonsense mutations. Nonsense mutations introduce stop codons, leading to early termination and often unstable products. In this bacterial protein, the substitution changes CAA (glutamine) to UAA (stop) at codon 7. This nonsense mutation yields a truncated, nearly undetectable polypeptide, consistent with choice D. Choice B fails by claiming synonymy, but UAA is a stop, not glutamine. For similar cases, confirm if the change creates a stop codon. Consider protein stability post-truncation.

Question 18

A bacterial isolate acquires resistance to a toxin that targets a specific membrane protein. Sequencing reveals a single base substitution converting codon 210 from 5'-UGG-3' to 5'-UGA-3'. The membrane protein is undetectable by immunoblot. Which effect is most consistent with the described mutation?

  1. The mutation increases translation because stop codons recruit additional tRNAs to speed elongation
  2. The mutation is synonymous because UGA and UGG both encode tryptophan
  3. The mutation causes a frameshift because a substitution changes the number of nucleotides in the mRNA
  4. The mutation likely introduces a premature stop codon, producing a truncated protein that may be rapidly degraded (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically nonsense mutations. Nonsense mutations create stop codons, leading to premature termination and often unstable truncated proteins. In this bacterial isolate, the substitution changes UGG (tryptophan) to UGA (stop) at codon 210. This introduces a premature stop, producing a truncated protein undetectable by immunoblot, as in choice D. Choice B fails by claiming synonymy, ignoring that UGA is a stop, not tryptophan. For similar cases, identify if the new codon is a stop. Consider nonsense-mediated decay as a reason for low protein levels.

Question 19

During ribosome profiling, a strong stall signal is detected at a run of proline codons in bacteria. The mRNA region is enriched for 5'-CCU-3' and 5'-CCA-3' (both Pro). The strain carries a mutation that reduces charging of one proline tRNA species but not another. Based on codon redundancy, which outcome is most consistent with these data?

  1. Stalling implies that the ribosome reads codons as overlapping doublets rather than triplets
  2. Stalling cannot occur at proline codons because redundancy guarantees equal translation rates for all synonymous codons
  3. Stalling implies that CCU and CCA encode different amino acids, so proline is being replaced
  4. Stalling can be codon-specific even for the same amino acid if the corresponding tRNA for certain synonymous codons is limiting (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically codon redundancy and tRNA availability. Redundancy allows multiple codons for one amino acid, but translation speed can vary if tRNAs for specific codons are limiting. In this ribosome profiling, a mutation reduces charging of one proline tRNA, causing stalls at certain proline codons. Stalling is codon-specific due to unequal tRNA availability for synonymous codons, as in choice D. Choice B fails by assuming redundancy ensures equal rates, misconstruing that tRNA pools influence efficiency. For future application, assess if mutations affect tRNA charging or abundance. Evaluate ribosome pausing data against codon usage.

Question 20

A synthetic gene is designed with repeated glycine codons. Two versions differ only in third-base composition: Version 1 uses 5'-GGU-3' exclusively; Version 2 uses 5'-GGC-3' exclusively. In the host bacterium, Version 2 produces more protein, though both encode glycine. Which conclusion is most consistent with codon usage and translation?

  1. The difference proves the ribosome reads only the first two bases of each codon
  2. The difference proves that GGU and GGC encode different amino acids in bacteria
  3. Higher expression suggests the host has more abundant or more efficiently charged tRNAs recognizing GGC than GGU (correct answer)
  4. The difference must be due to altered transcription start site selection because codons affect promoter binding

Explanation: This question tests understanding of the genetic code and its role in translation, specifically codon usage bias. Synonymous codons can lead to different expression levels based on tRNA abundance in the host. In this synthetic gene, Version 2 with GGC produces more protein than Version 1 with GGU, both encoding glycine. Higher expression suggests more abundant tRNAs for GGC in the bacterium, per choice C. Choice B fails by implying GGU and GGC encode different amino acids, denying redundancy. To check, compare expression with codon bias tables. Optimize genes by matching codons to host tRNA pools.