What this deck covers
This deck focuses on 7b Social Facilitation Loafing Deindividuation, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.
Study 7b Social Facilitation Loafing Deindividuation in MCAT Psychological Social Foundations with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which task type is most likely to worsen with observers present: simple or complex?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Complex or unfamiliar tasks. Arousal disrupts learning by strengthening incorrect dominant responses.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 275
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on 7b Social Facilitation Loafing Deindividuation, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Complex or unfamiliar tasks. Arousal disrupts learning by strengthening incorrect dominant responses.
Answer: Social loafing (Ringelmann effect). Individual effort decreases as group size increases.
Answer: Complex or novel tasks. Dominant responses are incorrect for new tasks, so arousal hurts performance.
Answer: Performance tends to improve (social facilitation). Well-practiced skills have correct dominant responses, enhanced by audience presence.
Answer: Reduced self-awareness and restraint due to anonymity in a group. Loss of individual identity weakens internal behavioral controls.
Answer: Deindividuation. Loss of individual identity reduces inhibitions against antisocial acts.
Answer: Withholding effort while benefiting from others' work. Individuals exploit collective effort without contributing.
Answer: The most likely or habitual response in a given situation. The automatic, well-practiced response that occurs without conscious thought.
Answer: Anonymity. Being unidentifiable removes personal accountability for behavior.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged by others. Fear of negative evaluation by observers increases physiological arousal.
Answer: Additive tasks. Individual contributions blend together, making it easier to hide reduced effort.
Answer: Worsened performance on difficult or novel tasks due to others' presence. Arousal from others enhances dominant responses, which are incorrect for unfamiliar tasks.
Answer: Deindividuation. Anonymity in groups reduces self-restraint.
Answer: The most likely or well-learned response in a given situation. The automatic response that becomes stronger under arousal.
Answer: Social facilitation. Well-practiced skills improve with audience-induced arousal.
Answer: Increased deindividuation and greater likelihood of disinhibited behavior. Physical anonymity reduces self-awareness and social inhibitions.
Answer: Performance increases (social facilitation). Simple tasks have correct dominant responses, so arousal helps performance.
Answer: Mere presence effect. Performance changes occur even without evaluation, supporting Zajonc's arousal theory.
Answer: Average individual performance decreases as group size increases. Coordination loss and motivation loss both contribute to this effect.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged by others. Fear of negative evaluation drives performance changes in social settings.
Answer: Worsened performance on complex/novel tasks in others' presence. Arousal from observers impairs performance on unfamiliar tasks requiring concentration.
Answer: Increased impulsive behavior and conformity to situational norms. Anonymity fosters disinhibition, amplifying reactions to immediate cues over personal norms.
Answer: Anonymity. Being unidentifiable reduces self-awareness and personal accountability.
Answer: Greater conformity to salient group norms (prosocial or antisocial). People follow whatever norms are most prominent in that context.
Answer: Reducing effort to avoid being exploited by free riders. People reduce effort to avoid doing more than their share for free riders.
Answer: Deindividuation. Anonymity from masking reduces self-awareness, enabling antisocial behavior.
Answer: Others being present increases arousal even without explicit evaluation. Physical presence alone can trigger arousal responses.
Answer: Withholding effort because others will do the work. Expecting others to carry the load reduces personal effort.
Answer: Loafing is reduced effort; diffusion is reduced felt accountability. Both involve groups, but target different aspects of performance.
Answer: Deindividuation reduces restraint; loafing reduces effort. Deindividuation affects behavior control; loafing affects motivation to contribute effort.
Answer: Deindividuation. Masks reduce personal accountability, enabling antisocial acts.
Answer: Reduced individual effort when contributions are pooled. People exert less effort in groups when individual contributions cannot be identified.
Answer: Arousal helps simple tasks but harms complex tasks. Moderate arousal optimizes performance; too much or too little impairs it.
Answer: Deindividuation. Anonymity in crowds reduces self-awareness and accountability.
Answer: Reducing effort to avoid being exploited by free riders. People reduce effort to avoid doing more than their fair share when others slack off.
Answer: Social loafing. Group contexts diffuse responsibility, leading to lower per-person input on shared goals.
Answer: Perceived responsibility is shared, so each person feels less accountable. In groups, blame or credit disperses, diminishing personal obligation and encouraging loafing.
Answer: Social inhibition. Audience presence impairs performance when task requires new learning.
Answer: Social inhibition. Complex tasks suffer when arousal interferes with processing.
Answer: Performance is best at moderate arousal; too low or too high worsens it. Inverted U-shape relationship between arousal and performance.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged by others. Fear of negative evaluation increases physiological arousal.
Answer: Low identifiability of individual effort. Anonymity allows individuals to hide in the group and slack off.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged, which alters performance. Cottrell's theory attributes effects to anxiety over potential criticism, modulating task execution.
Answer: Greater conformity to salient group norms, not necessarily antisocial behavior. Deindividuation amplifies whatever norms are present.
Answer: Inverted U: performance rises then falls as arousal increases. Optimal performance occurs at moderate arousal levels.
Answer: Social facilitation improvement due to a well-learned simple task. Well-practiced tasks benefit from arousal caused by others' presence.
Answer: Greater conformity to salient group norms. People follow group behavior more when individual identity is lost.
Answer: Deindividuation. Masks provide anonymity, reducing self-awareness and promoting antinormative actions in mobs.
Answer: Loss of self-awareness and restraint due to anonymity in a group. Group settings erode personal identity, lowering inhibitions and self-regulation.
Answer: Anonymity. Concealed identity removes accountability barriers.
Answer: Arousal increases the most likely response; helps easy tasks, harms hard tasks. Arousal amplifies habitual responses.
Answer: Social facilitation. Others' presence enhances performance on simple/well-learned tasks.
Answer: Attention conflict between task and audience increases arousal. Divided attention between task and observers creates arousal.
Answer: Deindividuation is disinhibition; social loafing is reduced task effort. Both involve groups but target different behaviors entirely.
Answer: Social facilitation. Expertise makes performance robust to audience-induced arousal.
Answer: Social facilitation. For experts, audience arousal strengthens well-rehearsed responses, improving execution.
Answer: When the task is complex or novel (dominant response is incorrect). Novel tasks require non-dominant responses, which arousal suppresses, causing errors under scrutiny.
Answer: Withholding effort because one can benefit from others' work. Taking advantage of group effort without contributing equally.
Answer: Social facilitation. Others' presence enhances well-learned running behavior.
Answer: Meaningful task. Personal investment in outcomes counteracts loafing tendencies.
Answer: Social loafing. Anonymity enables free-riding when individual output isn't tracked.
Answer: Task importance or indispensability reduces loafing. When success depends on everyone's contribution, social loafing decreases significantly.
Answer: Anonymity. Being unidentifiable reduces fear of consequences for actions.
Answer: Make individual contributions identifiable and evaluated. Accountability prevents hiding in the group.
Answer: Withholding effort because others will carry the task. Individuals reduce effort expecting others to compensate for their lack of contribution.
Answer: Complex, difficult, or novel tasks. Unfamiliar tasks require focus that arousal disrupts.
Answer: Reduced self-awareness and restraint due to anonymity in a group. Group anonymity weakens personal identity and normal inhibitions.
Answer: Decreased performance due to increased arousal and errors. Arousal interferes with non-dominant responses.
Answer: Coaction effect. Simultaneous task performance creates motivating social comparison.
Answer: Group performance depends on the best member's performance. Like problem-solving where only the smartest member needs to find the solution.
Answer: Reduced self-awareness and restraint, increasing impulsive behavior. Loss of individual identity in groups reduces self-regulation.
Answer: Anonymous or unidentifiable individual contributions. Lack of accountability removes motivation to exert full effort.
Answer: Loss of self-awareness and reduced restraint in a group. Group immersion diminishes individual identity.
Answer: Pressure for consensus reduces critical evaluation of alternatives. Desire for harmony overrides realistic appraisal of options.
Answer: Zajonc: presence of others increases arousal, strengthening the dominant response. Arousal amplifies whatever response is most practiced or natural.
Answer: Increased impulsive and norm-driven behavior. Reduced self-focus allows situational cues to guide behavior.
Answer: Simple or well-learned tasks. Dominant responses are correct for well-practiced tasks, so arousal helps.
Answer: Anonymity and high arousal (often within a large group). Feeling unidentifiable plus excitement weakens self-control.
Answer: Anonymity. Being unidentifiable reduces accountability and self-regulation.
Answer: Deindividuation. Anonymity reduces self-awareness, enabling antisocial behavior.
Answer: Others' presence alone can increase arousal even without explicit evaluation. Zajonc emphasized innate physiological activation from any co-actors, independent of judgment fears.
Answer: Social loafing. Pooled effort allows individuals to reduce contribution.
Answer: Anonymity. Being unidentifiable reduces personal accountability.
Answer: Improved performance on simple or well-learned tasks in others' presence. Arousal from others' presence enhances dominant responses.
Answer: Presence of others increases physiological arousal. Physical presence alone triggers arousal, regardless of interaction.
Answer: Dominant response. In Zajonc's model, arousal amplifies this habitual or prepotent action, explaining facilitation effects.
Answer: The most likely or habitual response in a given situation. Well-practiced behaviors emerge under arousal.
Answer: Worsened performance on complex or novel tasks in others' presence. Arousal from observers hinders learning or executing non-dominant responses required for difficult tasks.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged by others. Fear of negative evaluation drives performance changes.
Answer: Arousal from fear of being judged that alters performance. Concern about others' judgments creates arousal affecting performance.
Answer: Average individual productivity decreases as group size increases. Named after researcher who found rope-pulling effort decreased in groups.
Answer: Performance improves (social facilitation on well-learned tasks). Experts' dominant responses are correct, so arousal helps.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged by others. Fear of negative evaluation by observers increases arousal and affects performance.
Answer: Reduced self-awareness. Loss of self-focus prevents normal behavioral monitoring.
Answer: Performance worsens (social inhibition on novel/complex tasks). Novices' dominant responses are often errors, so arousal hurts.
Answer: Worsened performance on complex or novel tasks in others' presence. Arousal from others disrupts performance on difficult, unfamiliar tasks.
Answer: Individually tracked contributions. Accountability prevents free-riding and increases individual effort.
Answer: Make individual contributions identifiable and evaluated. Accountability prevents free-riding on others' efforts.
Answer: Arousal from concern about being judged by others. Fear of negative evaluation creates the arousal that drives audience effects.
Answer: Improved performance on simple/well-learned tasks in others' presence. Arousal from others' presence enhances dominant (well-practiced) responses.