What this deck covers
This deck focuses on 8b Attribution Processes Errors, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.
Study 8b Attribution Processes Errors in MCAT Psychological Social Foundations with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Identify the concept: Blaming a robbery victim for being in a "bad neighborhood."
Tap card or press Space to flip
Just-world hypothesis. Victim blaming restores belief in a fair world by implying deserved outcomes.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 57
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on 8b Attribution Processes Errors, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Just-world hypothesis. Victim blaming restores belief in a fair world by implying deserved outcomes.
Answer: Inferring stable traits from behavior, even when situational constraints exist. Tendency to assume behavior reflects personality despite constraints.
Answer: Self: situational causes; Others: dispositional causes. The bias arises from differing perspectives, where actors see their own situations but attribute others' behaviors to traits.
Answer: Multiple plausible causes reduce weight of any single cause. When multiple causes exist, each seems less important.
Answer: Situational (external) attribution. High distinctiveness (only this place) suggests external cause.
Answer: Consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Kelley's covariation model uses these to determine attribution type.
Answer: External (stimulus/situational) attribution. This pattern points to the specific stimulus causing the behavior, as it is consistent and shared but unique to the context.
Answer: External (temporary circumstances) attribution. Low consistency implies the behavior is due to transient factors rather than stable causes.
Answer: Attributing blame to reduce one's perceived vulnerability. This process helps individuals feel safer by distinguishing their situation from the victim's.
Answer: Fundamental attribution error. Ignoring situational pressures when judging others' behavior.
Answer: Group-based FAE: outgroup negatives internal, outgroup positives external. Extends FAE to intergroup contexts with in-group favoritism.
Answer: Success to self; failure to external factors. We protect self-esteem by attributing differently based on outcome.
Answer: Overestimating how much others share one's beliefs/acts. We think our views/behaviors are more common than they are.
Answer: Behavior is specific to one stimulus or context. High distinctiveness indicates the behavior is tied to a specific situation or stimulus.
Answer: Consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. These cues help determine if behavior covaries with persons, stimuli, or circumstances for accurate attributions.
Answer: Halo effect. Appearance creates positive impression affecting other judgments.
Answer: Ultimate attribution error. Shows in-group favoritism in causal explanations.
Answer: People infer cause from consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Three factors help determine internal vs external causes.
Answer: Inferring the causes of behavior and events. We explain why people act as they do by attributing causes.
Answer: Overattributing others' behavior to disposition over situation. We underestimate situational factors when judging others.
Answer: Explaining behavior by context, environment, or circumstances. Focuses on external factors rather than internal personality traits.
Answer: Correspondence bias. Ignoring situational pressure (rush) when judging personality.
Answer: One positive trait biases global evaluation of a person. Initial positive impression colors all subsequent judgments.
Answer: Correspondent inference (choice and low social desirability). Freely chosen, low-desirability actions strongly imply underlying traits without external influences.
Answer: Low consensus, low distinctiveness, high consistency. Person acts uniquely across situations consistently.
Answer: High consensus, high distinctiveness, high consistency. Everyone reacts similarly to this specific situation.
Answer: Internal: person traits; External: environment or context. Internal attributions link behavior to personal characteristics, while external ones consider environmental influences.
Answer: External (situational/circumstantial) attribution. This pattern indicates broad external factors, as the behavior is common across people and situations consistently.
Answer: Self: situational causes; others: dispositional causes for the same act. We have more info about our own situations than others'.
Answer: Just-world hypothesis. Blaming victims helps maintain belief in fairness.
Answer: Same person responds the same way over time in that context. High consistency shows the behavior is stable, supporting reliable attributions.
Answer: Explaining behavior by stable traits, motives, or personality. Focuses on internal factors like character rather than external factors.
Answer: Overattributing others' behavior to disposition and underweighting situation. We underestimate how situations influence others' actions.
Answer: Self: situation; others: disposition for the same behavior. We attribute our own actions to situations but others' to personality.
Answer: Actor-observer bias. You know your stress context but not theirs.
Answer: Attributing successes internally and failures externally. Protects self-esteem and maintains positive self-image.
Answer: Dispositional: internal traits; situational: external context. Dispositional = personality; situational = circumstances.
Answer: Defensive attribution. Blaming the victim reduces perceived personal risk by implying avoidable recklessness.
Answer: Others respond similarly to the same stimulus. High consensus suggests situational causes since the behavior is not unique to the individual.
Answer: Belief that people get outcomes they deserve. Assumes good/bad things happen to good/bad people respectively.
Answer: Self-serving bias. The bias preserves self-esteem by internalizing successes and externalizing failures.
Answer: A global positive impression biases ratings of specific traits. One positive trait influences perception of all traits.
Answer: Low desirability increases dispositional inference. Behaviors against norms are seen as more reflective of true dispositions due to lack of external pressure.
Answer: Assuming behavior reflects stable disposition despite context. Another term for fundamental attribution error.
Answer: Stable internal traits or intentions. The theory infers dispositions when behaviors are freely chosen and produce unique effects.
Answer: Behavior despite obstacles implies a stronger internal cause. Acting despite constraints suggests strong internal motivation.
Answer: An inference about the cause of a behavior or outcome. Attributions explain behaviors by inferring underlying causes, central to understanding social perceptions in psychology.
Answer: Self-serving bias. Attributing success internally and failure externally protects ego.
Answer: Unique outcomes that distinguish one choice from alternatives. Noncommon effects highlight intentional choices by showing outcomes not shared with other options.
Answer: Assigning causes to behavior and events (internal or external). Process of determining why events occur or people act certain ways.
Answer: Biased attributions about outgroup vs ingroup behavior. Extends fundamental attribution error to intergroup contexts.
Answer: Self-serving bias. Protects self-esteem by attributing failure externally.
Answer: Internal (dispositional) attribution. This pattern suggests the cause is unique to the person's traits, as others do not behave similarly across contexts.
Answer: Belief that people get outcomes they deserve; world is fundamentally fair. Helps maintain sense of control and predictability.
Answer: Situational attribution (actor–observer pattern). Actors attribute their own behavior to situations, not personality.
Answer: Actor-observer bias. This bias reflects differing perspectives: actors emphasize situations, while observers focus on dispositions.
Answer: Seeking/weighting info that supports an initial attribution. We favor evidence that confirms our initial causal judgment.