What this deck covers
This deck focuses on 8c Social Behavior Attraction Aggression Altruism, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.
Study 8c Social Behavior Attraction Aggression Altruism in MCAT Psychological Social Foundations with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the matching hypothesis in interpersonal attraction?
Tap card or press Space to flip
People tend to pair with others of similar physical attractiveness. Based on research showing couples typically have comparable attractiveness levels.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 88
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on 8c Social Behavior Attraction Aggression Altruism, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: People tend to pair with others of similar physical attractiveness. Based on research showing couples typically have comparable attractiveness levels.
Answer: Frustration increases the likelihood of aggression. Blocked goals create negative affect, which can displace onto available targets, increasing aggressive tendencies.
Answer: Satisfaction depends on perceived rewards minus costs. We evaluate relationships like economic transactions.
Answer: People tend to pair with others of similar physical attractiveness. This hypothesis posits that individuals form romantic relationships with those who match their own level of attractiveness to ensure mutual acceptance and relationship stability.
Answer: Behavior intended to harm another person who wants to avoid harm. This definition distinguishes aggression from accidental harm by emphasizing intentionality and the victim's desire to avoid it.
Answer: Intimacy, passion, and commitment. Complete love requires all three; absence creates different love types.
Answer: Frustration increases the likelihood of aggression. Blocked goals create negative arousal that motivates harm.
Answer: A global positive impression biases ratings of specific traits. One positive trait colors our view of all other traits.
Answer: Increased liking due to repeated exposure to a stimulus or person. Familiarity breeds liking through unconscious processing.
Answer: Aggression increases via observational learning and reinforcement. We imitate aggressive behaviors that are rewarded.
Answer: Hostile: anger-based; instrumental: goal-oriented. Hostile seeks to hurt; instrumental uses harm as a means.
Answer: Propinquity (proximity) effect. Physical closeness increases interaction opportunities.
Answer: Relationships persist when perceived rewards exceed perceived costs. Views relationships as cost-benefit analyses of interpersonal exchanges.
Answer: Intimacy, passion, and commitment. These elements form the vertices of the triangle, with different combinations yielding various types of love relationships.
Answer: Prosocial modeling (social learning of helping). Observing altruistic models provides vicarious reinforcement, encouraging imitation through social learning processes.
Answer: People tend to like those who communicate liking toward them. We tend to return the feelings others express toward us.
Answer: Reactive: anger response; instrumental: harm as a means to a goal. Reactive stems from emotional provocation, while instrumental uses aggression strategically to achieve non-aggressive objectives.
Answer: Being identifiable (reduced anonymity) increases helping. Accountability and social evaluation motivate prosocial behavior.
Answer: Helping decreases as the number of bystanders increases. Responsibility dilutes across multiple potential helpers.
Answer: Frustration increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior. Blocked goals create negative arousal that can trigger aggression.
Answer: Aggression is learned via observing and being reinforced for aggressive acts. Bandura showed modeling and rewards shape aggressive behavior.
Answer: Attributing successes to self and failures to external factors. We protect self-esteem by biasing causal attributions.
Answer: Perceived similarity increases interpersonal liking. We like those who share our attitudes, values, and interests.
Answer: Blocked goals increase the likelihood of aggressive behavior. Frustration from unmet goals can trigger aggressive responses.
Answer: Empathy can produce helping motivated by concern for others. True altruism stems from empathic concern, not self-benefit.
Answer: Responsibility to help is spread across observers, reducing action. Each bystander assumes others will act, so no one does.
Answer: Intense longing and physiological arousal, often early in relationships. This form of love involves high emotional intensity and physical desire, driven by novelty and uncertainty in initial romantic stages.
Answer: Group discussion strengthens the group's initial attitudes toward extremes. Like-minded people reinforce each other's views.
Answer: Success to internal causes; failure to external causes. We protect self-esteem by attributing differently based on outcomes.
Answer: Helping decreases as the number of bystanders increases. Group presence dilutes individual responsibility, leading to inaction in ambiguous emergencies.
Answer: Greater attraction to others with similar attitudes, values, or traits. We're drawn to those who share our beliefs and characteristics.
Answer: People are more attracted to others who share attitudes and values. We like those who are like us - a fundamental principle of attraction.
Answer: Helping motivated primarily by concern for others. Pure altruism lacks self-interested motives.
Answer: Empathic concern can produce genuinely altruistic helping. Perspective-taking evokes empathy, motivating aid purely to alleviate the other's distress, not for self-benefit.
Answer: Each person feels less personal obligation to help in a group. Responsibility gets diluted across multiple potential helpers.
Answer: Helping occurs with expectation of future return from the recipient. This mechanism promotes cooperation in social species by fostering long-term mutual benefits through tit-for-tat exchanges.
Answer: Helping relatives increases inclusive fitness. Helping kin preserves shared genes indirectly.
Answer: Frustration increases the likelihood of aggression. Blocked goals create negative arousal expressed as aggression.
Answer: Helping decreases as the number of bystanders increases. More witnesses paradoxically means less individual helping.
Answer: Deep affection, trust, and commitment with lower arousal. It emphasizes emotional bonding and loyalty, sustained by shared experiences and mutual support over time.
Answer: Helping decreases as the number of bystanders increases. More witnesses paradoxically leads to less individual helping.
Answer: Repeated exposure increases liking, even without interaction. Familiarity breeds comfort and positive feelings.
Answer: Each bystander feels less personal obligation to help. In groups, responsibility is shared, reducing the perceived urgency for any single person to intervene.
Answer: Aggression is learned via observation and reinforcement. Bandura's theory highlights modeling and vicarious reinforcement as mechanisms for acquiring aggressive behaviors from social environments.
Answer: Passionate: arousal; companionate: intimacy and commitment. Passionate fades quickly; companionate grows over time.
Answer: Expressing aggression reduces aggressive drive (not well supported). Research shows venting anger often increases, not decreases, aggression.
Answer: People help to reduce their own distress or negative mood. Helping others can be a strategy to improve our own emotional state.
Answer: Egoistic helping. Self-serving helping contrasts with purely altruistic helping.
Answer: People seek to maximize rewards and minimize costs in relationships. Relationships are evaluated based on a cost-benefit analysis, where perceived equity influences decisions to maintain or dissolve ties.
Answer: Aggression is learned through observation and reinforcement. Bandura showed children imitate aggressive models they observe.
Answer: People misread others' calm as evidence no help is needed. Collective inaction creates a false consensus that the situation is not emergent, inhibiting helping responses.
Answer: Satisfaction is highest when partners perceive fair input-output balance. Partners compare their contribution-benefit ratios for relationship health.
Answer: Repeated exposure to a stimulus increases liking for it. Familiarity breeds liking, not contempt, in most neutral contexts.
Answer: Lower serotonin activity is associated with increased impulsive aggression. Serotonin modulates impulse control, with deficiencies impairing inhibition of aggressive responses to provocations.
Answer: Egoistic (self-interested) helping. Helping serves personal goals like reputation or reciprocity.
Answer: Attractiveness leads to assuming other positive traits (for example, kindness). Physical beauty creates a cognitive bias affecting all trait judgments.
Answer: Behavior intended to harm another person. Intent to harm is key, regardless of actual damage.
Answer: Aggression is learned via observing and being reinforced for it. We model aggressive behaviors we see rewarded in others.
Answer: Individuals feel less personal obligation to act when others are present. Shared responsibility reduces individual accountability.
Answer: People tend to like those who express liking for them. We're attracted to those who show they're attracted to us.
Answer: Intimacy, passion, and commitment. These three dimensions combine to create different types of love.
Answer: Disclosure by one person tends to elicit disclosure by the other. Social norms encourage equivalent vulnerability, building trust and intimacy through balanced emotional exchanges.
Answer: People tend to pair with others of similar perceived attractiveness. Partners typically match in physical attractiveness levels.
Answer: Empathy-altruism hypothesis. True altruism stems from feeling another's distress.
Answer: Helping behavior intended to benefit another without expected reward. It represents selfless motivation, distinguishing it from egoistic helping driven by personal gains or obligations.
Answer: Passionate: arousal/intense; companionate: intimacy/commitment. Distinguishes initial intense attraction from deeper, stable attachment.
Answer: Attraction increases when someone is associated with rewards. Classical conditioning associates individuals with positive outcomes, strengthening attraction through reinforcement principles.
Answer: People prefer partners with similar physical attractiveness. We seek partners at our own attractiveness level to avoid rejection.
Answer: One positive trait leads to globally positive judgments. Initial impressions color all subsequent evaluations.
Answer: People misread others' calm as meaning no help is needed. We assume others' inaction means the situation is not serious.
Answer: One positive trait (often attractiveness) biases overall evaluation. A single salient positive attribute creates a cognitive bias, leading to overly favorable impressions in unrelated domains.
Answer: Altruism. Selfless helping despite personal sacrifice or danger.
Answer: Empathy for a person in need can produce altruistic helping. True altruism may exist when we feel another's pain as our own.
Answer: People tend to pair with others of similar perceived attractiveness. We seek partners at our own attractiveness level to avoid rejection.
Answer: Increase. Similarity consistently enhances interpersonal attraction.
Answer: Attractiveness biases observers to infer other positive traits. Physical beauty creates a cognitive bias affecting all trait judgments.
Answer: Higher testosterone is associated with increased dominance/aggression. Testosterone influences neural circuits related to social dominance, correlating with assertive and competitive behaviors.
Answer: People should help those who depend on them or are in need. Society expects us to assist vulnerable individuals.
Answer: Empathy can produce altruistic helping independent of self-gain. True empathy creates selfless motivation to help.
Answer: Helping relatives increases inclusive fitness via shared genes. Evolutionary theory explains preferential helping of genetic relatives to enhance the survival of shared alleles.
Answer: Increased liking due to repeated exposure to a stimulus. Familiarity breeds liking, not contempt, in most contexts.
Answer: People should help those who have helped them. Social obligation to return favors maintains cooperation.
Answer: Repeated exposure increases liking, even without interaction. Familiarity through repeated exposure fosters positive feelings due to reduced uncertainty and increased comfort with the stimulus.
Answer: Helping with expectation of future help in return. Evolutionary strategy of mutual benefit over time.
Answer: Similarity in attitudes and values increases attraction. Shared beliefs and characteristics promote rapport and validation, reducing conflict and enhancing mutual understanding.
Answer: Instrumental: goal-oriented; hostile: driven by anger to harm. Distinguishes calculated aggression from emotion-driven aggression.
Answer: Disclosure by one person tends to elicit disclosure by the other. Sharing personal information creates mutual vulnerability and trust.
Answer: Amygdala. The amygdala processes emotional threats, triggering fight-or-flight responses that can manifest as aggressive behavior.