Middle School Math Quiz: Rewrite Expressions In Different Forms
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Rewrite Expressions In Different FormsQuestion 1 of 20

The cost to rent a car is 25+0.15m25 + 0.15m dollars, where mm is miles driven. A customer wants to spend exactly $40. Which form of the equation $25+0.15m=4025 + 0.15m = 40 $ makes it easiest to see how many miles they can drive?

0.15m=150.15m = 15 because it isolates the variable term from the constant
m=40250.15m = \frac{40 - 25}{0.15} because it shows the calculation steps needed
25=400.15m25 = 40 - 0.15m because it shows the base cost equals remaining budget
25+0.15m40=1\frac{25 + 0.15m}{40} = 1 because it shows the ratio of cost to budget
← Back to quizzes

Middle School Math Quiz

Middle School Math Quiz: Rewrite Expressions In Different Forms

Practice Rewrite Expressions In Different Forms in Middle School Math with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Rewrite Expressions In Different Forms, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Middle School Math.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

The cost to rent a car is 25+0.15m25 + 0.15m dollars, where mm is miles driven. A customer wants to spend exactly $40. Which form of the equation $25+0.15m=4025 + 0.15m = 40 $ makes it easiest to see how many miles they can drive?

  1. 0.15m=150.15m = 15 because it isolates the variable term from the constant
  2. m=40250.15m = \frac{40 - 25}{0.15} because it shows the calculation steps needed (correct answer)
  3. 25=400.15m25 = 40 - 0.15m because it shows the base cost equals remaining budget
  4. 25+0.15m40=1\frac{25 + 0.15m}{40} = 1 because it shows the ratio of cost to budget
Explanation: The form m=40250.15m = \frac{40 - 25}{0.15} directly shows how to calculate the miles: take the budget (40),subtractthebasefee(40), subtract the base fee (25), then divide by the per-mile rate ($0.15). This makes the solution process transparent. Choice A requires another step to solve for $mm $. Choice C doesn't directly show the miles. Choice D creates unnecessary complexity with ratios.

Question 2

A rectangular garden has area 6x2+9x6x^2 + 9x square feet. Which factored form reveals the most useful information about possible dimensions?

  1. 3x(2x+3)3x(2x + 3) because it shows one side is 3x3x and the other is 2x+32x + 3 (correct answer)
  2. x(6x+9)x(6x + 9) because it shows one side is xx and the other is 6x+96x + 9
  3. 3(2x2+3x)3(2x^2 + 3x) because it shows the area is 3 times a simpler expression
  4. 6x(x+1.5)6x(x + 1.5) because it shows one side is 6x6x and the other is x+1.5x + 1.5
Explanation: Factoring out the greatest common factor: 6x2+9x=3x(2x+3)6x^2 + 9x = 3x(2x + 3). This form shows the dimensions as 3x3x feet by (2x+3)(2x + 3) feet, both of which are reasonable expressions for side lengths. Choice B factors out only xx, not the complete GCF. Choice C factors out 3 but doesn't reveal dimensional information. Choice D uses a decimal coefficient, which is less clean than the integer form.

Question 3

The temperature in degrees Fahrenheit can be converted to Celsius using C=59(F32)C = \frac{5}{9}(F - 32). Which equivalent expression shows how much the Celsius temperature changes when Fahrenheit increases by 9 degrees?

  1. C=5F91609C = \frac{5F}{9} - \frac{160}{9} to show the linear relationship with slope 59\frac{5}{9}
  2. C=5F1609C = \frac{5F - 160}{9} to show the numerator contains both variable and constant terms
  3. 9C=5F1609C = 5F - 160 to show that 9-degree Fahrenheit changes equal 5-degree Celsius changes (correct answer)
  4. 9C5=F32\frac{9C}{5} = F - 32 to show the inverse relationship between the temperature scales
Explanation: The form 9C=5F1609C = 5F - 160 clearly shows that when FF increases by 9, the term 5F5F increases by 5×9=455 \times 9 = 45, so 9C9C increases by 45, meaning CC increases by 5. This directly reveals the 9:5 ratio. Choice A shows the slope but not the specific 9-degree relationship. Choice B doesn't highlight the ratio. Choice D shows the inverse but doesn't emphasize the change relationship.

Question 4

A student buys 4 identical pens. If each pen costs cc dollars, the total cost is written as c+c+c+cc + c + c + c. Which rewrite best simplifies the expression and shows the relationship?

  1. 3c3c
  2. c4c^4
  3. c+4c + 4
  4. 4c4c (correct answer)
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: total cost of 4 items at $2 each: 2+2+2+2=4×2=8 (combining like terms shows multiplication); or 4 pens at c: c+c+c+c=4c (rewrite simplifies to coefficient times variable). The correct rewriting 4c4c shows equivalence by combining four like terms into multiplication, simplifies the expression, and clearly reveals the relationship as 4 times the cost per pen. Common errors include c4c^4 misusing exponents, c+4c + 4 adding instead of multiplying, or 3c3c undercounting the number of pens. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 5

A runner's time for a mile is tt minutes. After training, their time decreases by 10%, so the new time is t0.10tt - 0.10t. Which equivalent expression correctly represents the new time?

  1. t+0.10t + 0.10
  2. 0.90t0.90t (correct answer)
  3. 0.10t0.10t
  4. 1.10t1.10t
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: time t with 10% decrease, calculate t-0.10t=t(1-0.10)=t(0.90) (combining shows multiply by 0.90); or speed 50 mph decreased by 10%: 50-0.10(50)=50(0.90)=45 (rewrite reveals new amount directly). The correct rewriting 0.90t0.90t shows equivalence by combining like terms t - 0.10t = 0.90t, correctly represents the decreased time, and simplifies to a single multiplication. Common errors include 1.10t1.10t confusing decrease with increase, 0.10t0.10t which is just the decrease, or t+0.10t + 0.10 adding instead of subtracting. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 6

To quickly compute 7×23+7×777\times 23 + 7\times 77, a student wants to factor using the distributive property. Which expression is an equivalent factored form that makes mental math easiest?

  1. (7+23)77(7+23)77
  2. 7(23)+777(23) + 77
  3. 7(2377)7(23-77)
  4. 7(23+77)7(23+77) (correct answer)
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: compute 5×12 + 5×18 as 5(12+18)=5(30)=150 (factoring 5 simplifies addition inside); or 7×23 + 7×77=7(23+77)=7(100)=700 (rewrite makes mental math easy by summing to 100 first). The correct rewriting 7(23+77) shows equivalence by factoring out the common 7 using distributive property, makes mental math easiest by adding 23+77=100 then 7×100=700, and reveals the shared factor. Common errors include (7+23)77 which factors incorrectly, 7(23)+77 which doesn't factor fully, or 7(23-77) which changes addition to subtraction. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 7

A library charges cc dollars per bookmark, and a student buys 4 bookmarks. The total cost is written as c+c+c+cc+c+c+c. Which expression is an equivalent rewrite that shows the total as "4 times cc"?

  1. 4c4c (correct answer)
  2. c4c^4
  3. c/4c/4
  4. 4+c4+c
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, buying 4 bookmarks at c dollars each, the total c + c + c + c can be combined as 4c, showing it's 4 times the cost per bookmark. The correct rewriting is 4c, which demonstrates equivalence by combining like terms and clearly shows the multiplication relationship. A common error is selecting c^4 which exponents instead of multiplies, or 4 + c which adds instead, or c/4 which divides wrongly. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in c=2: 4(2)=8, 2+2+2+2=8✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80).

Question 8

A rectangle has length ll and width ww. Its perimeter can be written as 2l+2w2l + 2w. Which rewrite shows the meaning more clearly as "twice the sum of length and width"?

  1. l+wl + w
  2. (2l)(2w)(2l)(2w)
  3. 2(lw)2(l-w)
  4. 2(l+w)2(l+w) (correct answer)
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: perimeter of rectangle with sides 5 and 3 is 2×5 + 2×3=2(5+3)=2(8)=16 (factoring 2 shows twice the sum); or length l width w: 2l + 2w=2(l+w) (rewrite clarifies the structure). The correct rewriting 2(l+w) shows equivalence by factoring out 2 from both terms, clearly reveals the meaning as twice the sum of length and width, and simplifies understanding of the perimeter formula. Common errors include l + w which omits the doubling, (2l)(2w) which multiplies instead of adding, or 2(l-w) which subtracts incorrectly. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 9

Rewrite the expression 3x+123x+12 in factored form to show the greatest common factor and make it easier to solve equations like 3x+12=03x+12=0.

  1. x+4x+4
  2. 3x+43x+4
  3. 12(x+3)12(x+3)
  4. 3(x+4)3(x+4) (correct answer)
Explanation: This question tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, 4x + 16 = 4(x + 4), factoring out 4 to simplify solving 4x + 16 = 0 by dividing both sides by 4 after. The correct rewriting is 3x + 12 = 3(x + 4), which shows equivalence by factoring out the greatest common factor 3 and makes it easier to solve equations like setting to zero. A common error is 3x + 4 distributing incorrectly, or x + 4 factoring out 3 incompletely, or 12(x + 3) using wrong factor. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 10

A rectangle has length ll and width ww. Its perimeter is written as 2l+2w2l+2w. Which rewrite shows the structure of the perimeter most clearly (and can be useful for mental math)?

  1. 2(l+w)2(l+w) (correct answer)
  2. (l+w)2(l+w)^2
  3. 2lw2lw
  4. l+2wl+2w
Explanation: This question tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, a rectangle with l=10, w=5 has perimeter 2(10)+2(5)=20+10=30, or rewritten as 2(10+5)=2(15)=30, showing the structure of twice the sum of sides. The correct rewriting is 2l + 2w = 2(l + w), which shows equivalence by factoring out 2 and clearly reveals the perimeter as twice the sum of length and width, useful for mental math. A common error is choosing (l+w)^2, confusing perimeter with area, or 2lw which is area, or l+2w incomplete factoring. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 11

A video game has a score bonus that adds 5% more points to your current score ss. The new score is written as s+0.05ss + 0.05s. Which rewrite best shows the relationship as one multiplication?

  1. 5s5s
  2. 1.05s1.05s (correct answer)
  3. 0.05s0.05s
  4. s+5s + 5
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: salary $25/hr with 5% raise, calculate 25+0.05(25)=25+1.25=26.25, or rewrite: 25+0.05(25)=25(1+0.05)=25(1.05)=26.25 (factoring 25 shows multiply by 1.05); or score 100 with 5% bonus: 100+0.05(100)=100(1.05)=105 (rewrite reveals multiply by 1.05 for 5% increase). The correct rewriting 1.05s1.05s shows equivalence by factoring out s to combine terms as s(1+0.05), reveals the relationship as a single multiplication for the total score after bonus, and simplifies computation. Common errors include 0.05s0.05s forgetting the original score, 5s5s misinterpreting percent as multiplying by 5, or s+5s + 5 adding a flat 5 instead of 5%. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 12

A class is collecting cans. Last week they collected pp cans, but this week they collected 20% fewer. The amount this week is p0.20pp - 0.20p. Which equivalent expression makes it easiest to find the new amount?

  1. 0.80p0.80p (correct answer)
  2. p20p - 20
  3. 1.20p1.20p
  4. 0.20p0.20p
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: cans p with 20% fewer, calculate p-0.20p=p(1-0.20)=p(0.80) (factoring p shows multiply by 0.80); or sales $50 with 20% discount: 50-0.20(50)=50(0.80)=40 (rewrite reveals multiply by 0.80 for 20% decrease). The correct rewriting 0.80p0.80p shows equivalence by combining like terms p - 0.20p = 0.80p, makes it easiest to compute as 80% of p, and reveals the decrease relationship clearly. Common errors include 1.20p1.20p confusing decrease with increase, 0.20p0.20p which is only the reduction, or p20p - 20 subtracting a flat 20 instead of percentage. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 13

A snack costs pp dollars. The store adds 8% sales tax, so the total cost is p+0.08pp+0.08p. Which equivalent expression shows the total as one multiplication?

  1. 8p8p
  2. 1.08p1.08p (correct answer)
  3. p(0.08)p(0.08)
  4. p+0.8p+0.8
Explanation: This question tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, a $50 item with 8% tax is 50 + 0.08(50) = 50 + 4 = 54, or rewritten as 50(1 + 0.08) = 50(1.08) = 54, showing the total as 108% of original. The correct rewriting is p + 0.08p = 1.08p, which shows equivalence by combining like terms and reveals the utility of one multiplication for total cost including tax. A common error is p(0.08) only the tax amount, or p + 0.8 adding flat 0.8, or 8p multiplying by 8 incorrectly. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 14

A video game has a 25% off sale. If the original price is pp, the sale price is p0.25pp-0.25p. Which rewrite shows the sale price as "multiply by the part that remains," so it's quicker to compute?

  1. 0.75p0.75p (correct answer)
  2. 1.25p1.25p
  3. p25p-25
  4. 0.25p0.25p
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, with a video game price p discounted by 25%, the sale price p - 0.25p can be factored as p(1 - 0.25) = 0.75p, showing it's equivalent to multiplying by the remaining 75% for quicker computation. The correct rewriting is 0.75p, which shows equivalence through factoring and highlights the utility of multiplying by the portion that remains after the discount. A common error is selecting 1.25p, which would be for a 25% increase instead of decrease (sign error), or 0.25p which is just the discount amount, forgetting the original minus that (should be 0.75p), or p-25 which subtracts a flat 25 instead of percentage. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if p=100, does 0.75(100)=100-0.25(100)? 75=75✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80).

Question 15

A notebook costs $6. A store is having a 25% off sale. The sale price can be written as 60.25(6)6 - 0.25(6). Which equivalent expression shows the discount as "multiply by the part you pay" and makes it easier to calculate?

  1. 6(1.25)6(1.25)
  2. 6(0.25)6(0.25)
  3. 6(0.75)6(0.75) (correct answer)
  4. 6256 - 25
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: notebook $6 with 25% off, calculate 6-0.25(6)=6-1.5=4.5, or rewrite: 6-0.25(6)=6(1-0.25)=6(0.75)=4.5 (factoring 6 shows multiply by 0.75); or shirt $20 with 25% off: 20-0.25(20)=20(0.75)=15 (rewrite reveals multiply by 0.75 for 25% discount). The correct rewriting $6(0.75) shows equivalence by factoring out the common factor 6 to get 6(1-0.25), simplifies to multiplying by the portion paid, and makes mental calculation easy as 75% of 6 is 4.5. Common errors include choosing $6(1.25) for an increase instead of decrease, $6(0.25) which is just the discount, or 6256 - 25 which subtracts a flat 25 incorrectly ignoring percentage. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 16

A school club buys 12 identical water bottles for a trip and 8 more for new members. Each bottle costs 3.503.50. The total cost is 3.5×12+3.5×83.5\times 12 + 3.5\times 8. Which rewrite makes the calculation easiest?

  1. 3.5(128)3.5(12-8)
  2. 3.5×(12×8)3.5\times (12\times 8)
  3. 3.5(12+8)3.5(12+8) (correct answer)
  4. (3.5×12)×8(3.5\times 12)\times 8
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). Example: cost of 12 items at $3 each plus 8 at $3: 3×12 + 3×8=3(12+8)=3(20)=60 (factoring 3 simplifies); or 3.5×12 + 3.5×8=3.5(20)=70 (rewrite makes addition easy first). The correct rewriting 3.5(12+8) shows equivalence by factoring out 3.5 using distributive property, makes calculation easiest by adding 12+8=20 then 3.5×20=70, and is useful for mental math. Common errors include 3.5(12-8) changing to subtraction, (3.5×12)×8 which associates differently and complicates, or 3.5×(12×8) which multiplies counts first incorrectly for total cost. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a≠0.1a, =1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).

Question 17

A science club's supply amount increases by 20%. If the original amount is aa, the new amount is a+0.2aa+0.2a. Which equivalent expression correctly shows this as a single multiplication and explains the relationship between adding 20% and multiplying?

  1. a(0.2)a(0.2)
  2. 2a2a
  3. 1.2a1.2a (correct answer)
  4. 0.8a0.8a
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, with a supply amount a increased by 20%, the new amount a + 0.2a can be factored as a(1 + 0.2) = 1.2a, explaining that adding 20% is equivalent to multiplying by 1.2. The correct rewriting is 1.2a, which shows equivalence by combining terms and reveals the multiplication relationship for percentage increase. A common error is choosing a(0.2) which is only the increase (forgetting original), or 0.8a which is for decrease, or 2a which doubles instead of adding 20%. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in a=10: 1.2(10)=12, 10+0.2(10)=10+2=12✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80).

Question 18

A rectangle has length ll and width ww. Its perimeter is written as 2l+2w2l+2w. Which equivalent expression best shows the relationship "perimeter is twice the sum of length and width"?

  1. (2l)(2w)(2l)(2w)
  2. 2(l+w)2(l+w) (correct answer)
  3. l+w+2l+w+2
  4. 2(lw)2(l-w)
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, a rectangle's perimeter 2l + 2w can be factored as 2(l + w), clearly showing it's twice the sum of length and width. The correct rewriting is 2(l + w), which demonstrates equivalence by factoring out 2 and reveals the geometric relationship effectively. A common error is selecting (2l)(2w) which multiplies to area instead of perimeter, or l + w + 2 which adds an extra 2 incorrectly, or 2(l - w) which subtracts leading to difference. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in l=5, w=3: 2(5+3)=16, 2(5)+2(3)=10+6=16✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80).

Question 19

A school store increases the price of a notebook by 5%. The new price can be written as p+0.05pp+0.05p. Which equivalent expression shows this as "multiply the original price by one number," making it easier to calculate?

  1. p(0.05)p(0.05)
  2. 0.05p0.05p
  3. 5p5p
  4. 1.05p1.05p (correct answer)
Explanation: Tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, with a notebook price p increased by 5%, the new price p + 0.05p can be factored as p(1 + 0.05) = 1.05p, showing it's equivalent to multiplying the original price by 1.05 for quick calculation. The correct rewriting is 1.05p, which shows equivalence by combining like terms and reveals the utility of a single multiplication for efficiency. A common error is choosing 0.05p or p(0.05), which only represents the increase amount, forgetting to include the original p (should be 1.05p), or mistaking it for 5p which multiplies by 5 instead of 1.05. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if p=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.5✓), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80).

Question 20

A science kit costs $40. The store marks it up by 30%, so the new price is 40+0.3(40)40 + 0.3(40). Which rewrite shows the price as "multiply by a single factor" and helps you compute quickly?

  1. 40(1.3)40(1.3) (correct answer)
  2. 0.7(40)0.7(40)
  3. 40(0.3)40(0.3)
  4. 40+0.340 + 0.3
Explanation: This question tests rewriting expressions in equivalent forms using properties of operations—factoring, expanding, combining—to simplify problems or reveal relationships. Rewriting purposes: (1) simplify calculation (7×23+7×777 \times 23 + 7 \times 77 as 7(23+77)=7(100)=7007(23+77)=7(100)=700 easier mentally), (2) reveal relationship (a+0.05a=a(1+0.05)=1.05aa + 0.05a = a(1+0.05) = 1.05a shows "increase by 5%" means "multiply by 1.05"), (3) combine for clarity (p+0.08p=1.08pp + 0.08p = 1.08p shows total with 8% tax). Apply distributive a(b+c)=ab+aca(b+c)=ab+ac both directions: expanding (multiply out) or factoring (pull out common factor). For example, a $50 item with 30% markup is 50+0.3(50)=50+15=6550 + 0.3(50) = 50 + 15 = 65, or rewritten as 50(1+0.3)=50(1.3)=6550(1 + 0.3) = 50(1.3) = 65, showing quick multiplication by 1.3. The correct rewriting is 40+0.3(40)=40(1.3)40 + 0.3(40) = 40(1.3), which shows equivalence by factoring out 40 and helps compute quickly as a single multiplication factor. A common error is 40(0.3)40(0.3) only the markup, or 0.7(40)0.7(40) confusing with discount, or 40+0.340 + 0.3 adding flat 0.3. Strategy: (1) identify operation needed (factor, expand, combine?), (2) apply properties (distributive for expand/factor, commutative/associative for rearranging, combining for like terms), (3) verify equivalence (plug in value: if a=10, does 1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)1.05(10)=10+0.05(10)? 10.5=10.510.5=10.5\checkmark), (4) assess usefulness (which form easier? reveals relationship?). Percent increase/decrease pattern: increase by r% means multiply by (1+r)(1+r) as decimal (increase by 15% → ×1.15\times 1.15), decrease by r% means multiply by (1r)(1-r) (decrease by 20% → ×0.80\times 0.80). Mistakes: forgetting original amount (a+0.1a0.1aa+0.1a \neq 0.1a, =1.1a=1.1a), sign errors (subtract distributing positive), incomplete operations (partial factoring/distributing).