What this quiz covers
This quiz focuses on Linear Inequalities, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for PSAT Math.
A number line shows an open circle at 0 and shading to the left. Which inequality matches the graph?
PSAT Math Quiz
Practice Linear Inequalities in PSAT Math with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
This quiz focuses on Linear Inequalities, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for PSAT Math.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
A number line shows an open circle at 0 and shading to the left. Which inequality matches the graph?
Explanation: This question asks for the inequality matching a number line with an open circle at 0 and shading to the left. Open circle excludes 0, left shading means less than, so x < 0. Direct interpretation. A key error is using ≤ for open circle. Another pitfall is right shading as greater than. Open circles mean strict < or >.
For a fundraiser, a team must sell at least 80 items. They have already sold 27 items and plan to sell the same number each day for x days, with 6 items per day. Which inequality represents meeting the goal?
Explanation: This question requires an inequality for selling at least 80 items total, with 27 already sold and 6 per day for x days. Total items: 6x + 27, and 'at least' means ≥80. So, 6x + 27 ≥ 80. Choice B uses ≤, which is the opposite, and D rearranges terms incorrectly. A key error is using subtraction instead of addition for already sold items. Another pitfall is confusing 'at least' with 'at most.' For goal-oriented inequalities, ensure the symbol matches 'at least' (≥) and test with x=0 to check baseline.
A theater must sell at least 120 tickets to break even. It has already sold 45 tickets. Let t be the additional tickets sold. Which inequality shows how many more tickets must be sold?
Explanation: This question asks for the inequality showing how many additional tickets t must be sold to reach at least 120 total, with 45 already sold. The total tickets are 45 + t, and it must be at least 120, so 45 + t ≥ 120. No negative multiplication occurs, so the direction stays the same. A common error is using ≤ instead of ≥, as if it were at most. Another mistake is subtracting 45 incorrectly, like in choice B or D. Carefully match words like 'at least' to ≥ in modeling problems.
A school bus can carry at most 52 students. There are already 18 students on the bus. Let s be the number of additional students. Which inequality represents the situation?
Explanation: The question requires an inequality for additional students s on a bus with at most 52 total and 18 already aboard. The situation is 18 + s ≤ 52, which simplifies to s ≤ 34 by subtracting 18. This uses ≤ because 'at most' includes equality. A key error is using greater than for capacity limits. Another mistake is adding instead of subtracting the existing students. In modeling problems, define variables clearly and choose the correct inequality direction based on limits.
A number line shows a closed circle at −3 and shading to the right. Which inequality matches the graph?
Explanation: This question asks for the inequality matching a number line with a closed circle at -3 and shading to the right. Closed circle includes -3, right shading means greater than or equal, so x ≥ -3. Direct from graph. A common error is using > for closed circle. Another mistake is left shading as less than. Associate closed circles with ≥ or ≤.
Solve the inequality 32x−1<5. What is the solution?
Explanation: The task is to solve (2x−1)/3<5 and find the solution. Multiply both sides by 3 (positive, no reversal) to get 2x−1<15. Add 1: 2x<16, then divide by 2 (positive, no reversal): x<8. This is choice A. Common mistakes include using ≤ for non-strict inequalities, as in B, or reversing due to forgotten steps. If there were negatives, explicitly reverse, but here all operations preserve direction. Students might subtract instead of adding, leading to > like in C. A strategy is to work backwards from choices by testing values like x=7 in the original inequality.
Solve 9−3x≥2. For what values of x is the inequality true?
Explanation: The question asks to solve 9 - (x/3) ≥ 2 and find the values of x that make it true. Add (x/3) to both sides to get 9 ≥ 2 + (x/3), then subtract 2 to obtain 7 ≥ x/3. Multiply both sides by 3, which is positive, so the inequality remains ≥, resulting in 21 ≥ x or x ≤ 21. A common error is flipping the inequality when multiplying by positive 3. Another pitfall is subtracting incorrectly from both sides. To verify, test boundary values like x = 21 in the original inequality.
A museum charges a one-time entry fee of $12 plus $3 per exhibit you visit. You have at most $30 to spend. Let $x$ be the number of exhibits you visit (a whole number). What is the solution to the inequality that represents this situation?
Explanation: This problem asks us to find the maximum number of exhibits you can visit with a $30 budget when there's a $12 entry fee and $3 per exhibit. We need to set up an inequality: total cost ≤ $30, which gives us 12+3x≤30. Solving this, we subtract 12 from both sides to get 3x≤18, then divide by 3 to get x≤6. The key error to avoid is forgetting to include the entry fee or using a strict inequality when the problem says "at most." When dealing with real-world constraints involving money, remember that "at most" translates to ≤, not <.
A factory produces x parts per hour. To meet a contract, production must be more than 120 parts per hour, but due to safety rules it must be at most 160 parts per hour. Which inequality describes all allowable values of x?
Explanation: This problem describes production constraints where output must be more than 120 parts per hour but at most 160 parts per hour. "More than 120" translates to x>120 (strict inequality), while "at most 160" means x≤160 (inclusive). Combining these gives us 120<x≤160. The critical distinction is recognizing when to use strict versus inclusive inequalities based on the wording. Pay attention to phrases like "more than" (>) versus "at least" (≥) to avoid boundary errors.
Solve −23x+1≤4. For what values of x is the inequality true?
Explanation: This question asks for the values of x satisfying (3x + 1)/(-2) ≤ 4. Multiply both sides by -2, and since negative, reverse ≤ to ≥, getting 3x + 1 ≥ -8. Subtract 1 to get 3x ≥ -9, divide by 3 (positive, no reversal) to get x ≥ -3. A common error is not reversing when multiplying by negative, leading to x ≤ -3. Another mistake is arithmetic, getting x ≥ 3. Test boundary values to confirm.
A delivery truck can carry at most 1,200 pounds. The truck already has 350 pounds loaded, and each box weighs 55 pounds. Let x be the number of boxes added. Which inequality shows the possible values of x?
Explanation: This question asks for the inequality modeling added boxes without exceeding 1,200 pounds, with 350 already loaded. Total weight is 55x + 350, and 'at most' means ≤1,200. So, 55x + 350 ≤ 1,200. Choice A uses ≥, opposite of capacity limit, and C subtracts 350 incorrectly. A common error is subtracting instead of adding the initial load. Another pitfall is using < instead of ≤, excluding the maximum. When modeling limits, verify by considering if equality is allowed, like exactly 1,200 pounds.
A school club is ordering snacks. Granola bars cost $1.50 each and the club has no more than $24. They must buy at least 8 bars. Let $bbethenumberofbars.Whichcompoundinequalitydescribesallpossiblevaluesofb$?
Explanation: This question involves creating a compound inequality for the number of granola bars b, where at least 8 are needed and the cost of $1.50 each is at most $24. The minimum gives b ≥ 8, and for the cost, 1.5b ≤ 24, so divide by 1.5 to get b ≤ 16, combining to 8 ≤ b ≤ 16. Since b is likely whole numbers, possible values are integers from 8 to 16. A key error is using strict inequalities like in choice C, which excludes the endpoints that are valid here. Another mistake is inverting the inequalities, leading to outside ranges like in choice D. For compound inequalities, test boundary values to ensure they satisfy both conditions.
For what values of x is the inequality 3x−5+2≤7 true?
Explanation: We need to solve (x−5)/3+2≤7 for x. First, subtract 2 from both sides to get (x−5)/3≤5. Multiply both sides by 3 to get x−5≤15. Finally, add 5 to both sides to obtain x≤20. The key is to perform operations systematically, treating the inequality like an equation but being careful about sign changes. When fractions are involved, clear them early by multiplying to simplify your work.
A number line shows an open circle at 3 and shading to the left. Which inequality matches the graph?
Explanation: This question requires matching an inequality to a number line with an open circle at 3 and shading to the left. The open circle means 3 is excluded, and left shading indicates values less than 3. Therefore, the inequality is x < 3, which is choice B. Errors often involve mistaking open for closed, leading to ≤ or ≥ like in A or C, or misinterpreting direction. No negative operations here, so inequality direction isn't flipped. A pitfall is confusing left with greater than. When interpreting graphs, remember open means strict and direction dictates less/greater; verify by picking a shaded point like x=2.
A fundraiser sells candles for $9 each. The group must raise more than $270. Let $c$ be the number of candles sold. Which inequality represents the goal?
Explanation: This question asks for the inequality representing selling candles at $9 each to raise more than $270. Total is 9c, and more than means 9c>270. No negatives here. A key error is using ≥ instead of >, including exactly 270. Another pitfall is omitting the 9, like c>270. Use strict inequality for 'more than'.
A theater has 240 seats. A group is reserving seats in blocks of 12, and at least 6 blocks must be reserved, but no more than all seats can be used. Let x be the number of blocks. Which inequality gives all possible values of x?
Explanation: The question asks for a compound inequality for the number of 12-seat blocks x in a 240-seat theater, with at least 6 blocks and no more than the total seats allow. This gives x ≥ 6 and 12x ≤ 240, dividing by 12 for x ≤ 20, so 6 ≤ x ≤ 20. Assuming x is an integer, values are from 6 to 20. A common error is using single inequalities like in A or B instead of compound. Another pitfall is strict inequality like in D, excluding valid endpoints. When building inequalities from constraints, combine them and check endpoints satisfy the conditions.
Which value of x satisfies the inequality 5−2x≤−9?
Explanation: This question requires finding which given value of x satisfies the inequality 5 - 2x ≤ -9. Solve by subtracting 5 to get -2x ≤ -14, then divide by -2, reversing the inequality since dividing by negative, yielding x ≥ 7. Among the choices, only x=10 satisfies, as 5 - 2(10) = -15 ≤ -9 is true, while others like x=6 give -7 > -9. A key error is not reversing the inequality, which would incorrectly suggest x ≤ 7 and pick choice C. Another mistake is plugging in without solving, potentially missing the correct one. For verification questions, substitute each choice into the original inequality to confirm.
A club plans to rent vans for a trip. Each van seats 12 people, and at least 85 members have signed up to go. If v represents the number of vans the club must rent, which inequality best models this situation?
Explanation: When you encounter word problems involving inequalities, focus on identifying the constraint and translating it into mathematical language. Here, you need to determine how many vans are required to seat at least 85 people. Let's set up the relationship: each van seats 12 people, so v vans can seat 12v people total. Since at least 85 members are going, the total seating capacity must be greater than or equal to 85. This gives us 12v≥85. Choice A (12v≥85) correctly represents this situation. The left side shows total seating capacity, and the inequality ensures this capacity meets or exceeds the 85-member requirement. Choice B (12v≤85) reverses the inequality direction, suggesting the seating capacity should be less than or equal to 85 people. This makes no sense since you need to accommodate at least 85 members. Choice C (v+12≥85) incorrectly adds the number of vans to the seating capacity per van, rather than multiplying. This would mean v+12 people can be seated, which doesn't reflect how van capacity actually works. Choice D (v+12≤85) combines both errors from choices B and C: it uses addition instead of multiplication and reverses the inequality direction. Key strategy: In constraint problems, identify what quantity must meet or exceed a threshold, then ensure your inequality points in the correct direction. The phrase "at least" always translates to "greater than or equal to" (≥).
A recipe needs between 2 and 5 cups of flour, inclusive. Let f be cups of flour. Which inequality represents the constraint?
Explanation: This question asks for the inequality constraining flour f between 2 and 5 cups, inclusive. Inclusive means 2 ≤ f ≤ 5. No solving involved. A key error is using strict inequalities, excluding 2 and 5. Another pitfall is 'or' instead of between. Include equalities for 'inclusive'.
Solve −6(x−2)>18. What is the solution?
Explanation: The question asks to solve -6(x - 2) > 18. First, distribute -6 to get -6x + 12 > 18, then subtract 12 to obtain -6x > 6. Divide by -6, which is negative, so reverse the inequality to x < -1. The key step is flipping the > to < when dividing by negative. A common error is forgetting to flip the inequality sign. Another pitfall is incorrect distribution of the negative. Always highlight operations with negatives to avoid sign errors in inequalities.