PSAT Reading and Writing Quiz: Function Of A Word Or Phrase

20 questions · exam conditions

0:00

Function Of A Word Or PhraseQuestion 1 of 20

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In museum studies, curators increasingly question the neutrality of display labels. When an exhibit describes an artifact as "primitive," it subtly positions modern viewers as more advanced than the makers. Such wording can shape interpretation as strongly as the object itself, especially for visitors unfamiliar with the culture on display. Defenders of traditional labels argue that older terms are sometimes retained for consistency across collections. Nevertheless, many institutions now revise language to reduce implied hierarchies and invite more contextual understanding.

It provides a specific illustrative example

It introduces the topic's main controversy

It acknowledges a limitation of reforms

It states the passage's overall conclusion

← Back to quizzes

PSAT Reading and Writing Quiz

PSAT Reading and Writing Quiz: Function Of A Word Or Phrase

Practice Function Of A Word Or Phrase in PSAT Reading and Writing with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Function Of A Word Or Phrase, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for PSAT Reading and Writing.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

It provides a specific illustrative example (correct answer)
It introduces the topic's main controversy
It acknowledges a limitation of reforms
It states the passage's overall conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides a specific illustrative example by showing how the word 'primitive' in labels implies superiority and shapes viewer interpretation. It follows the introduction of questioning label neutrality and illustrates the issue, which then connects to the strength of wording's influence, defenders' arguments, and revisions for equity. This logical flow uses the example to concretize the abstract critique before discussing responses. Choice B might tempt as it relates to controversy, but it incorrectly labels it as introducing the main controversy when that's done earlier; choice C misreads it as acknowledging limitations of reforms, which isn't the focus. In function questions, identify examples by noting when a sentence applies a general idea to a particular case.

Question 2

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In microbiology, the term "biofilm" refers to communities of microbes attached to a surface. Within a biofilm, cells secrete a sticky matrix that slows antibiotic penetration and alters microbial metabolism. This structure helps explain why infections on medical implants can be difficult to eradicate. Still, biofilms vary widely across species and environments, so no single treatment works in all cases. Consequently, researchers test combinations of mechanical removal and targeted drugs to disrupt the matrix.

It provides a mechanistic explanation (correct answer)
It introduces a counterargument
It draws a final conclusion
It shifts to a new topic

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides a mechanistic explanation for biofilms' resilience by detailing the matrix's effects on antibiotics and metabolism. It follows the definition and precedes infection challenges, explaining how structure contributes to treatment difficulties. This mechanism underpins the need for varied treatments discussed later. Choice B might tempt if misread as opposition, but it elucidates the concept; choice C incorrectly concludes when it's mid-explanation. In function questions, focus on sentences that describe underlying processes to identify their explanatory role.

Question 3

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Environmental historians argue that ideas about "wilderness" have often been shaped by political power. In the United States, some early national parks were created by removing Indigenous communities who had long managed those landscapes. This history complicates the notion that parks simply preserve untouched nature. Park advocates respond that protected areas have prevented many forms of industrial exploitation. A fuller account therefore recognizes both conservation benefits and the social costs embedded in certain preservation policies.

It supplies historical evidence for a claim (correct answer)
It introduces the topic of wilderness broadly
It acknowledges a counterargument to criticism
It draws a concluding policy recommendation

Explanation: The underlined sentence supplies historical evidence for a claim by detailing the removal of Indigenous communities in creating U.S. national parks. It follows the argument about political shaping of 'wilderness' ideas and provides evidence, which then complicates preservation notions, notes advocates' responses, and calls for fuller accounts. This logical flow supports the critique with specifics. Choice C might tempt as it counters criticism, but it incorrectly labels it as acknowledgment when it's evidentiary; choice D misassigns it as a recommendation. In function questions, identify historical evidence by noting past events that back a broader argument.

Question 4

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In literary criticism, an unreliable narrator is often defined as a storyteller whose account readers have reason to doubt. In Kazuo Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day, Stevens's meticulous tone repeatedly clashes with the emotional implications of what he describes. This mismatch encourages readers to infer gaps between Stevens's self-image and his actual motivations, especially when he downplays moments of moral compromise. Still, the novel does not simply "expose" Stevens; it also invites sympathy by showing how social expectations shaped his choices. As a result, unreliability here functions less as a trick than as a method for exploring self-deception.

It provides a specific illustration (correct answer)
It qualifies a prior definition
It introduces a new research question
It presents the final conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides a specific illustration by giving an example from Ishiguro's novel to exemplify the concept of an unreliable narrator introduced in the prior sentence. It connects the general definition to a concrete literary case, allowing the text to then analyze the implications of this unreliability and its broader function in exploring self-deception. This illustration grounds the abstract definition before the passage shifts to nuance and sympathy. Choice B could mislead by suggesting it qualifies the definition, but it supports rather than refines the initial idea. Choice D misassigns it as the final conclusion, ignoring its early placement as an example. In function questions, identify whether a sentence exemplifies a concept by checking if it follows a definition and precedes further analysis.

Question 5

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Conservation biologists sometimes propose wildlife corridors to connect habitats fragmented by roads and development. But corridors can also funnel animals toward human-dominated areas, increasing vehicle collisions or conflict with livestock. For example, in regions where a corridor passes near farms, predators may follow the same route and prey on domesticated animals. On the other hand, when corridors are paired with fencing and carefully placed crossings, they can reduce roadkill and support gene flow. Effective design therefore depends on local land use and species behavior.

It introduces a potential drawback (correct answer)
It provides an example of success
It defines the main proposal
It concludes with a recommendation

Explanation: The underlined sentence introduces a potential drawback by pointing out how wildlife corridors might increase human-animal conflicts despite their benefits. It follows the proposal of corridors and uses 'but' to qualify it, setting up examples of issues and then contrasting with successful designs. This creates a balanced discussion leading to the importance of context-specific design. Choice B might tempt if confusing it with the later success example, but it highlights a problem, not a success. Choice C misidentifies it as defining the proposal, which is in the first sentence. In function analysis, watch for concessive transitions like 'but' that signal introductions of drawbacks or qualifications to maintain argumentative balance.

Question 6

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Some economists claim that remote work increases productivity by reducing commuting time and allowing employees to customize their work environments. Yet surveys of remote workers often rely on self-reported output, which can inflate perceived gains. To address this concern, a recent analysis compared objective performance metrics from a software firm before and after its remote-work transition. The firm's bug-fix rate rose modestly, but only for experienced employees; newer hires showed no improvement. These findings suggest that remote work can boost productivity, though the effect depends on how performance is measured and on worker experience.

It acknowledges a limitation of evidence. (correct answer)
It provides an example of success.
It summarizes the analysis's findings.
It proposes a policy recommendation.

Explanation: The underlined sentence acknowledges a limitation of evidence by pointing out the potential bias in self-reported surveys of remote workers. It follows the economists' claim about productivity gains and precedes the description of a recent analysis that uses objective metrics, thus qualifying the initial claim and motivating the need for a more rigorous study. This creates a logical flow where potential flaws are noted before introducing better evidence, leading to nuanced findings about experience levels. Choice C might tempt readers by seeming to summarize findings, but it actually critiques the evidence base rather than reporting results, which come later in the bug-fix rate details. In function questions, watch for scope: acknowledging a limitation qualifies a claim without contradicting it or summarizing the entire analysis. As a patient tutor, remember that identifying such concessions helps reveal the text's balanced approach to building an argument.

Question 7

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Historians once described the Industrial Revolution as a sudden break from premodern life, but newer scholarship emphasizes gradual change. In many English towns, household spinning and weaving expanded for decades before factories dominated production. This continuity suggests that industrialization built on existing skills and local trade networks rather than replacing them overnight. At the same time, factory labor did introduce novel forms of discipline, including time clocks and centralized supervision. The revised account thus balances long-term development with recognition of genuinely new workplace institutions.

It signals a shift to a new topic
It offers a specific piece of evidence (correct answer)
It acknowledges an alternative viewpoint
It states the passage's overall conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence offers a specific piece of evidence by illustrating the gradual expansion of household production before factories. It builds on the initial contrast between old and new historical views of the Industrial Revolution, providing concrete support for the idea of continuity, which then leads into discussions of new factory disciplines and a balanced revised account. This flow emphasizes how the evidence refines the understanding of industrialization as evolutionary rather than abrupt. Choice D might tempt because the sentence contributes to the conclusion, but it incorrectly labels it as the overall conclusion when the passage ends with a broader synthesis. Choice C misassigns it as acknowledging an alternative, but it's actually supporting the main scholarly shift. In function questions, watch for scope: evidence supports claims without necessarily concluding or shifting topics entirely.

Question 8

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In discussions of algorithmic fairness, some propose removing sensitive attributes like race from training data. But excluding these variables can still leave models biased because other features may act as proxies. This problem explains why fairness efforts often require auditing outcomes, not just inputs. Nevertheless, collecting sensitive data for audits can raise privacy concerns and legal constraints. As a result, researchers explore methods that protect individual information while still enabling bias detection.

It qualifies a proposed solution (correct answer)
It provides supporting evidence
It introduces the main topic
It draws a final conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence qualifies a proposed solution to algorithmic bias by noting how proxies can perpetuate issues despite attribute removal. It appears after suggesting data exclusion and before advocating audits, introducing nuance about indirect biases. This qualification explains the need for outcome-focused approaches amid privacy concerns. Choice B could mislead by labeling it evidence, but it limits the proposal's effectiveness; choice C misidentifies it as introductory. In function questions, differentiate qualifications that add caveats from evidence that supports without reservation.

Question 9

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Conservation biologists sometimes propose relocating threatened species to new habitats as climates shift. This strategy can backfire if the relocated species disrupts existing food webs or carries novel pathogens. A well-known amphibian relocation, for example, coincided with disease spread in nearby populations, though causation remains debated. Because of such risks, many scientists argue that assisted migration should be considered only after habitat protection and connectivity measures have been exhausted. The debate therefore centers not on whether intervention is possible, but on how to weigh urgency against ecological uncertainty.

It explains a potential risk of a strategy. (correct answer)
It introduces the topic of conservation.
It provides an example of success.
It states a concluding recommendation.

Explanation: The underlined sentence explains a potential risk of the relocation strategy by highlighting disruptions to food webs or pathogen spread. It follows the proposal of relocating species and precedes an example of amphibian issues, thus qualifying the initial idea and leading to arguments for prioritizing other measures. This creates a balanced flow where a strategy is introduced, its risks noted, and the debate framed around weighing urgency and uncertainty. Choice C might seem like an example of success, but the sentence warns of backfiring, with the actual example illustrating risks afterward. In function questions, watch for risk explanations that add caution without concluding the entire discussion. As a tutor, understanding these qualifiers helps see the text's careful navigation of complex topics like conservation.

Question 10

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Biostatisticians warn that correlations in health data can be misleading when important variables are omitted. For example, a study might find that people who carry lighters have higher lung-cancer rates, even though the real driver is smoking. The point is not that data analysis is futile, but that causal claims require careful design and interpretation. Randomized trials can help, though they are not always ethical or feasible. Researchers therefore combine multiple approaches to approximate causal inference responsibly.

It provides an example of confounding (correct answer)
It introduces the passage's main recommendation
It acknowledges a limitation of randomized trials
It concludes by summarizing the argument

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides an example of confounding by illustrating how lighter-carrying correlates with cancer due to the omitted smoking variable. It follows the warning about misleading correlations and gives a concrete case, which then emphasizes careful design, trials' role, and combined approaches. This logical flow demonstrates the issue before discussing solutions. Choice C might tempt as it limits trials, but it incorrectly assigns that role when the sentence exemplifies; choice B mislabels it as the main recommendation. In function questions, identify confounding examples by noting omitted variables that explain spurious links.

Question 11

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In climate modeling, aerosols remain a major source of uncertainty because they can both cool and warm the atmosphere. Measurements show that sulfate particles tend to reflect sunlight, while black carbon absorbs it and heats surrounding air. This contrast helps explain why different regions experience different temperature effects depending on pollution sources. However, aerosol lifetimes are short, so their impacts can change quickly with policy or weather. As a result, improving aerosol observations is crucial for narrowing near-term climate projections.

It provides supporting evidence (correct answer)
It introduces a counterargument
It draws a final conclusion
It shifts to a new topic

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides supporting evidence for aerosols' uncertainty in climate modeling by contrasting the effects of different particle types. It follows the introduction of aerosols' dual roles and precedes regional explanations, using measurements to illustrate why aerosols complicate predictions. This evidence reinforces the need for better observations discussed later. Choice B might mislead by suggesting a counterargument, but it elaborates on the initial point; choice D incorrectly shifts it to a new topic when it deepens the existing one. In function questions, trace the evidence's role in supporting the paragraph's central uncertainty theme.

Question 12

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In debates about algorithmic fairness, one common proposal is to make automated decisions more transparent to affected users. Transparency alone, however, may not prevent harm if users lack the resources to contest decisions or if the system's goals remain unjust. Audits of credit-scoring tools show that even when explanations are provided, errors can persist for months without effective avenues for correction. Still, transparency can be valuable when paired with enforceable rights to appeal and independent oversight. The broader challenge is designing institutions that can translate information into accountability.

It acknowledges a limitation of a proposal (correct answer)
It provides quantitative results from audits
It introduces the topic of fairness
It offers a final solution to the problem

Explanation: The underlined sentence acknowledges a limitation of a proposal by noting that transparency in algorithmic decisions may not suffice without additional resources or just goals. It builds on the introduction of transparency as a fairness measure and qualifies it before presenting audit evidence and broader challenges. This limitation ensures a realistic view, leading to suggestions for complementary measures. Choice C could mislead by seeing it as introducing fairness, but the topic is already set, and this qualifies the proposal. Choice D incorrectly views it as a final solution, overlooking its role in highlighting shortcomings. When tackling these, examine how sentences with words like 'however' often limit or qualify prior suggestions without resolving the issue.

Question 13

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Geologists use isotopic dating to estimate the ages of rocks, but the method depends on assumptions about initial conditions. If a mineral has been heated enough to allow isotopes to diffuse, its "clock" may partially reset, yielding an age younger than the rock's formation. This is why metamorphic terrains often contain minerals that record multiple events, such as burial and later uplift. Nevertheless, cross-checking different minerals with different closure temperatures can help reconstruct a sequence of changes. Interpreting dates, then, requires linking laboratory measurements to a rock's thermal history.

It explains a source of measurement error (correct answer)
It presents a broad claim about geology
It provides an example from metamorphism
It draws a concluding inference

Explanation: The underlined sentence explains a source of measurement error by describing how heating can reset isotopic clocks in minerals, leading to inaccurate age estimates. It follows the general use of isotopic dating and its assumptions, providing a specific reason for potential inaccuracies before discussing metamorphic examples and cross-checking methods. This explanation integrates into the text's flow toward interpreting dates with thermal history in mind. Choice A is correct, but choice C might tempt by confusing it with the later metamorphism example, though the underlined part explains the error mechanism itself. Choice D misassigns it as a concluding inference, as conclusions appear at the end. In function questions, differentiate explanations of errors from examples by focusing on conditional phrases like 'if' that outline mechanisms.

Question 14

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In art history, the term "avant-garde" is often used as if it described a single, unified movement. In practice, groups labeled avant-garde have differed sharply in politics and aesthetics, from Dada's antiwar satire to Futurism's celebration of speed and violence. Recognizing these differences prevents critics from treating innovation as automatically progressive. Yet the label persists because it captures a shared stance of opposition to established norms. A careful account therefore uses the term while specifying which tradition and goals are at stake.

It illustrates diversity within a category (correct answer)
It introduces a new topic unrelated to art
It acknowledges a limitation of historical sources
It draws a conclusion about terminology

Explanation: The underlined sentence illustrates diversity within a category by highlighting differences in politics and aesthetics among avant-garde groups like Dada and Futurism. It follows the critique of treating 'avant-garde' as unified and provides examples of variation, which then prevents overgeneralization and leads into the label's persistence and need for specificity. This flow uses diversity to refine the term's use. Choice D might seem tempting as it relates to terminology, but it incorrectly labels it as concluding when it's illustrative; choice C misassigns it as acknowledging source limitations. In function questions, recognize diversity illustration when a sentence contrasts subgroups within a broader label.

Question 15

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Biologists studying invasive species often look for traits that help newcomers outcompete native organisms. However, some invasions fail even when the introduced species grows quickly and reproduces often. This complication indicates that success depends not only on an invader's traits but also on the vulnerability of the ecosystem it enters. For instance, diverse communities may resist takeover by using resources more completely. Thus, predicting invasion outcomes requires considering both organism biology and local ecological context.

It provides a specific example
It qualifies a general expectation (correct answer)
It introduces the main topic
It draws a final conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence qualifies a general expectation about invasive species by highlighting cases where invasions fail despite advantageous traits. It follows the introduction of traits for outcompeting natives and precedes the emphasis on ecosystem vulnerability, introducing nuance to show that success is not solely trait-dependent. This qualification shifts the focus to a more comprehensive view, incorporating both invader biology and ecological context. Choice A might tempt if viewing it as an example, but it counters the expectation rather than illustrates the initial point; choice C misassigns an introductory role since the main topic is already stated. In function questions, watch for scope: qualifying a claim is different from contradicting it or providing straightforward examples.

Question 16

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Some educators advocate for frequent low-stakes quizzes as a way to improve long-term learning. Studies of retrieval practice show that recalling information strengthens memory more effectively than rereading notes, even when students feel less confident afterward. In classroom trials, students who took short quizzes often performed better on cumulative exams than students who spent the same time reviewing. However, quizzes can crowd out discussion or project work if they are overused or poorly aligned with course goals. Therefore, proponents typically recommend brief quizzes integrated into broader instructional plans.

It provides empirical support for a strategy (correct answer)
It presents a counterexample to a claim
It defines a key educational term
It shifts focus to implementation details

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides empirical support for a strategy by citing studies on retrieval practice that back the advocacy for low-stakes quizzes mentioned earlier. It connects the general recommendation to research evidence, strengthening the argument before discussing classroom trials and potential drawbacks like overcrowding instruction. This support builds a case for the strategy while leading to balanced recommendations. Choice B could mislead by framing it as a counterexample, but it reinforces rather than challenges the claim. Choice D incorrectly assigns a shift to implementation, which occurs later. For function questions, note how sentences with research references often serve to empirically support preceding ideas, especially in educational or scientific texts.

Question 17

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

In debates about standardized testing, critics argue that scores mostly reflect family income rather than academic ability. Some studies, however, find that test scores predict first-year college grades even after controlling for high school GPA. This evidence suggests that the tests capture at least some skills relevant to coursework. Yet prediction is not the same as fairness, since unequal preparation can still distort who gets opportunities. A nuanced policy discussion must therefore separate questions of measurement from questions of equity.

It provides a countering piece of evidence (correct answer)
It introduces the central topic
It acknowledges a limitation
It draws a final conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides a countering piece of evidence to critics' arguments about standardized testing by citing studies on predictive value. It comes after the income-reflection claim and before separating prediction from fairness, offering data that challenges the dismissal of tests' utility. This evidence nuances the debate by showing some academic relevance. Choice C could mislead by suggesting a limitation, but it counters rather than limits internally; choice B misassigns an introductory role. In function questions, recognize countering evidence that addresses opposition within the argument's structure.

Question 18

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Political theorists often distinguish between negative liberty (freedom from interference) and positive liberty (capacity to act). This distinction matters because policies can expand one kind of freedom while constraining the other. For example, mandatory schooling limits immediate choice but may increase long-term agency by building skills. Critics respond that such tradeoffs can be exaggerated when institutions are unaccountable. Still, the framework helps clarify why debates about "freedom" can involve genuinely different values.

It explains why a concept matters (correct answer)
It provides a specific example
It acknowledges a counterargument
It draws a final conclusion

Explanation: The underlined sentence explains why a concept matters by highlighting the policy implications of distinguishing negative and positive liberty. It appears after defining the liberties and before examples, underscoring the distinction's relevance to tradeoffs in freedom. This explanation connects the theoretical framework to real-world debates, enhancing its significance. Choice B could mislead by suggesting an example, but it discusses importance rather than specifics; choice C misreads it as a counterargument when it's affirmative. In function questions, note when a sentence links ideas to broader consequences to understand its explanatory role.

Question 19

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Psychologists studying memory consolidation distinguish between short-term rehearsal and long-term stabilization. During sleep, hippocampal activity replays patterns associated with recent learning, strengthening connections in the cortex. This mechanism helps explain why sleep deprivation often harms recall and skill acquisition. Still, not all sleep stages contribute equally, and some tasks benefit more than others. Consequently, researchers now examine how specific sleep features, like spindles, relate to different kinds of learning.

It provides a mechanistic explanation (correct answer)
It introduces a counterargument
It draws a final conclusion
It shifts to a new topic

Explanation: The underlined sentence provides a mechanistic explanation for memory consolidation by describing hippocampal activity during sleep. It follows the distinction between short-term and long-term processes and precedes explanations of sleep deprivation effects, detailing how replay strengthens connections. This mechanism bridges the concept to practical implications like recall impacts. Choice B might tempt if misread as opposition, but it elucidates rather than counters; choice C incorrectly assigns a concluding role when it's explanatory support. In function questions, identify sentences that explain 'how' something works to separate them from evidence or conclusions.

Question 20

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?

Urban ecologists have argued that city parks can serve as "stepping-stones" for pollinators moving across heavily built landscapes. To test this idea, researchers surveyed bee species in 18 parks that varied in size and distance from one another. They found that parks closer together shared more species, suggesting that bees disperse between green spaces rather than persisting in isolation. However, the study also noted that floral diversity within each park predicted bee abundance more strongly than park size did. Taken together, the results imply that connectivity matters, but only when parks also provide sufficient food resources.

It introduces a central claim.
It describes the study's method. (correct answer)
It presents the study's main result.
It states the author's final conclusion.

Explanation: The underlined sentence describes the study's method by explaining how researchers tested the idea of parks as stepping-stones for pollinators. It follows the initial argument from urban ecologists and sets up the subsequent presentation of findings, such as shared species in closer parks and the role of floral diversity, thereby bridging the hypothesis to the evidence and implications. This placement shows the sentence's role in outlining the practical approach before delving into results and conclusions. A tempting distractor is choice C, which incorrectly assigns the role of presenting the main result, but the actual results (like species sharing and floral diversity's impact) appear in the sentences that follow. Choice A misreads it as introducing the central claim, which is actually stated in the first sentence about ecologists' argument. In function questions, always read the sentences before and after the underlined portion to trace how it contributes to the text's logical progression.