Multiply Multi-Digit Whole Numbers
Help Questions
5th Grade Math › Multiply Multi-Digit Whole Numbers
A school is ordering new textbooks. They need $$147$$ books for each of their $$23$$ classrooms. Each book costs $$\28$$. What is the total amount the school will spend on textbooks?
$$\4116$$ for the total textbook expenditure
$$\198$$ for the total textbook expenditure
$$\94668$$ for the total textbook expenditure
$$\3381$$ for the total textbook expenditure
Explanation
This requires two multiplication steps. First, find total books needed: $$147 \times 23 = 3381$$ books. Then multiply by cost per book: $$3381 \times 28 = 94668$$. The total cost is $$\94668$$. Choice A represents $$147 + 23 + 28$$. Choice B represents $$147 \times 28$$ (one classroom's cost). Choice D represents only the total number of books without multiplying by the cost per book.
Roberto multiplies $$234 \times 67$$ and gets $$15678$$. To check his work, he decides to use the fact that $$67 = 70 - 3$$. Which expression should Roberto calculate to verify his answer?
$$234 \times 70 \times 234 \times 3$$ and compare to $$15678$$
$$234 + 70 - 234 + 3$$ and compare to $$15678$$
$$234 \times 70 - 234 \times 3$$ and compare to $$15678$$
$$234 \times 70 + 234 \times 3$$ and compare to $$15678$$
Explanation
Using the distributive property, $$234 \times 67 = 234 \times(70 - 3) = 234 \times 70 - 234 \times 3$$. Roberto should calculate $$234 \times 70 - 234 \times 3 = 16380 - 702 = 15678$$ to verify. Choice A adds instead of subtracts. Choice C multiplies the partial products instead of using the distributive property. Choice D uses addition throughout instead of multiplication.
A factory produces $$156$$ boxes of cereal per hour. If the factory operates for $$24$$ hours per day for $$7$$ consecutive days, how many boxes of cereal will be produced in total?
$$187$$ boxes of cereal produced
$$1092$$ boxes of cereal produced
$$26208$$ boxes of cereal produced
$$3744$$ boxes of cereal produced
Explanation
This requires multiple multiplication steps. First, find boxes per day: $$156 \times 24 = 3744$$ boxes per day. Then multiply by 7 days: $$3744 \times 7 = 26208$$ boxes total. Choice B represents $$156 \times 7$$ (ignoring the 24 hours). Choice C represents only one day's production ($$156 \times 24$$). Choice D represents $$156 + 24 + 7$$, adding instead of multiplying.
A warehouse ships $$126$$ packages per day. Each package contains $$37$$ items. If the warehouse operates for $$15$$ days, which calculation will give the total number of items shipped?
$$126 \times 37 + 15 = 4677$$ total items shipped
$$126 + 37 \times 15 = 681$$ total items shipped
$$126 \times 37 \times 15 = 69930$$ total items shipped
$$126 + 37 + 15 = 178$$ total items shipped
Explanation
To find total items, multiply packages per day by items per package by number of days: $$126 \times 37 \times 15 = 69930$$ items. First $$126 \times 37 = 4662$$, then $$4662 \times 15 = 69930$$. Choice A adds all values instead of multiplying. Choice B calculates items for one day then adds days instead of multiplying. Choice C adds packages per day to the product of items per package and days, which doesn't represent the situation correctly.
Sarah needs to find $$275 \times 48$$. She decides to use the fact that $$48 = 50 - 2$$ to make the calculation easier. If she calculates $$275 \times 50 = 13750$$, what should she do next to find the correct answer?
Divide by $$2$$ to get $$13750 \div 2 = 6875$$
Multiply by $$2$$ to get $$13750 \times 2 = 27500$$
Add $$275 \times 2 = 550$$ to get $$13750 + 550 = 14300$$
Subtract $$275 \times 2 = 550$$ to get $$13750 - 550 = 13200$$
Explanation
Using the distributive property, $$275 \times 48 = 275 \times(50 - 2) = 275 \times 50 - 275 \times 2$$. Since Sarah calculated $$275 \times 50 = 13750$$, she needs to subtract $$275 \times 2 = 550$$ to get $$13750 - 550 = 13200$$. Choice A adds instead of subtracts. Choice C and D don't use the distributive property correctly and would give incorrect results.
Lisa is calculating $$456 \times 89$$ using the standard algorithm. She correctly finds that $$456 \times 9 = 4104$$ and $$456 \times 80 = 36480$$. However, when she adds these partial products, she gets $$76584$$. What error did Lisa make?
She incorrectly calculated the second partial product $$456 \times 80$$
She incorrectly calculated the first partial product $$456 \times 9$$
She made an error when adding the two partial products together
She correctly calculated everything and $$76584$$ is the right answer
Explanation
Lisa's partial products are correct: $$456 \times 9 = 4104$$ and $$456 \times 80 = 36480$$. However, when adding $$4104 + 36480$$, the correct sum is $$40584$$, not $$76584$$. Lisa made an addition error. The correct answer to $$456 \times 89$$ is $$40584$$. Choice A and B are incorrect because both partial products are calculated correctly. Choice D is wrong because $$76584$$ is not the correct final answer.
A student multiplies $135\times 24$ and writes this work:
$$
\begin{array}{r}
\ \ 135\ \times\ 24\ \hline
\ \ 540\ \ \ 270\ \hline
\ \ 810\ \end{array}
$$
Multiplication relies on place value, and partial products must represent multiplying by ones and tens correctly. Which statement best describes the error?
The student misaligned the ones partial product; $135\times 4$ should start in the tens place.
The student added instead of multiplying; they should have found $135+24$ first.
The student should not add partial products; they should multiply the partial products together.
The student forgot the tens place value: $135\times 20$ should be 2,700, not 270.
Explanation
Multi-digit multiplication uses place value to correctly interpret and compute with positional digits. Partial products separate the multiplication into parts based on the multiplier's digits and their places. Aligning digits means shifting higher place partial products left to match their value, like adding zeros for tens. This connects to the area model by visualizing the product as summed rectangular areas from place value pairs. A misconception is confusing addition with multiplication in partial products, but they must be multiplied first. The algorithm works through the distributive property applied to place values. It generalizes because it systematically accounts for all interactions between digits' places.
Compute $63 \times 25$ using the standard algorithm. Which value is the correct product (showing that multiplying by 2 tens gives a partial product with a zero)?
The product is 1625.
The product is 880.
The product is 1575.
The product is 315.
Explanation
Multi-digit multiplication uses place value to handle digits in ones, tens, and beyond systematically. Partial products come from multiplying by each digit with its place value, like 63 × 5 and 63 × 20 for 63 × 25. Aligning involves placing the tens partial product shifted left, often with a trailing zero for clarity. This ties to the area model, dividing into rectangles such as 60 × 20, 60 × 5, 3 × 20, and 3 × 5, totaling 1575. A misconception is omitting the zero in the tens partial product, which might lead to misadding and wrong totals like 126 + 315 = 441 instead. The algorithm works because it builds the product layer by layer using place values. It ensures consistent results for various multi-digit scenarios.
A student tries to multiply $76 \times 52$ using the standard algorithm. Their work shows partial products of $76 \times 2 = 152$ and $76 \times 5 = 380$, then they add $152 + 380 = 532$. Which statement best describes the mistake using place value reasoning?
The student should not line up digits by place value when multiplying.
The student added instead of multiplying, so they should have found $76 + 52$.
The student forgot that the 5 in 52 means 5 tens, so the second partial product should be $76 \times 50$, not $76 \times 5$.
The student should have subtracted the partial products instead of adding them.
Explanation
Multi-digit multiplication uses place value to expand numbers like 52 into 5 tens and 2 ones, which helps identify errors in computation. Partial products should be 76 × 2 = 152 for ones and 76 × 50 for tens, but the student mistakenly used 76 × 5 instead. Aligning digits requires right-alignment by place value, with the tens partial product shifted to reflect the extra factor of 10. This connects to the area model, splitting the multiplication into areas for 76 × 50 and 76 × 2, summed together. A common misconception is ignoring the tens place multiplier, treating 5 as just 5 instead of 50, leading to a smaller product. The algorithm works by breaking down numbers via place values and multiplying distributively. It generalizes well because it consistently applies these principles to yield correct results across various multi-digit problems.
A class is making $28$ snack bags. Each bag needs $45$ pretzels. The multiplication is $45\times 28$. Which claim about using the standard algorithm is incorrect (think about place value and partial products)?
Multiplication relies on place value because the digits in 28 represent 20 and 8.
The partial product for the 2 in 28 should represent 2 tens, so it must be written one place to the left.
You can find $45\times 28$ by adding $45\times 8$ and $45\times 20$.
Because 2 is in the tens place, $45\times 2$ should be added without shifting since it is still just 2.
Explanation
Multi-digit multiplication uses place value to correctly value each digit's contribution, such as 2 in 28 representing 20. Partial products arise from multiplying by each component, like 8 ones and 2 tens, to build the total. Aligning digits involves shifting the tens product to align with its place value during addition. This relates to the area model, where place values create grid sections whose areas sum to the product. A misconception is adding without shifting for tens, treating it as a simple digit instead of a multiple of ten. The algorithm is reliable because it decomposes and reassembles based on place values. It generalizes to ensure correct products for any multi-digit combination.