Quadratic Equations and Inequalities - Algebra 2
Card 1 of 1444
Solve the following quadratic inequality, and report your answer in interval form:

Solve the following quadratic inequality, and report your answer in interval form:
Tap to reveal answer
The problem is already in standard form, so all we have to at first do is set the quadratic expression = 0 and factor as normal.


Negative $x^2$'s are hard to work with, so we multiply through by -1.


Now we can factor easily.

By the zero product property, each of these factors will be equal to 0.




Since -9 and 1 are our zeros, we just have to test one point in the region between them to find out which region our answer set goes in. Let's test x = 0 in the original inequality.



Since this statement is false, the region between -9 and 1 is not correct. So it must be the region on either side of those points. Since the original inequality was less than or equal to, the boundary points are included. So all values from -infinity to -9 inclusive, and from 1 inclusive to infinity, are solutions. In interval notation we write this as:
![(-\infty, -9]\cup [1, \infty)](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/213778/gif.latex)
The problem is already in standard form, so all we have to at first do is set the quadratic expression = 0 and factor as normal.
Negative $x^2$'s are hard to work with, so we multiply through by -1.
Now we can factor easily.
By the zero product property, each of these factors will be equal to 0.
Since -9 and 1 are our zeros, we just have to test one point in the region between them to find out which region our answer set goes in. Let's test x = 0 in the original inequality.
Since this statement is false, the region between -9 and 1 is not correct. So it must be the region on either side of those points. Since the original inequality was less than or equal to, the boundary points are included. So all values from -infinity to -9 inclusive, and from 1 inclusive to infinity, are solutions. In interval notation we write this as:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

Solve this inequality.
Solve this inequality.
Tap to reveal answer
Combine like terms first.

Factor

The zeroes are 3 and 8 so a number line can be divided into 3 sections.
X<3 works, 3<x<8 does not work, and x>8 works
Combine like terms first.
Factor
The zeroes are 3 and 8 so a number line can be divided into 3 sections.
X<3 works, 3<x<8 does not work, and x>8 works
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve the following quadratic inequality:

Solve the following quadratic inequality:
Tap to reveal answer
First we want to rewrite the quadratic in standard form:



Now we want to set it = 0 and factor and solve like normal.


Using the zero product property, both factors produce a zero:




So the two zeros are -2 and 3, and will mark the boundaries of our answer interval. To find out if the interval is between -2 and 3, or on either side, we simply take a test point between -2 and 3 (for instance, x = 0) and evaluate the original inequality.




Since the above is a true statement, we know that the solution interval is between -2 and 3, the same region where we picked our test point. Since the original inequality was less than or equal, we include the endpoints.
Ergo,
.
First we want to rewrite the quadratic in standard form:
Now we want to set it = 0 and factor and solve like normal.
Using the zero product property, both factors produce a zero:
So the two zeros are -2 and 3, and will mark the boundaries of our answer interval. To find out if the interval is between -2 and 3, or on either side, we simply take a test point between -2 and 3 (for instance, x = 0) and evaluate the original inequality.
Since the above is a true statement, we know that the solution interval is between -2 and 3, the same region where we picked our test point. Since the original inequality was less than or equal, we include the endpoints.
Ergo, .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve the following quadratic inequality:

Solve the following quadratic inequality:
Tap to reveal answer

1. Rewrite the equation in standard form.

2. Set the equation equal to
and solve by factoring.


So,
and
are our zeroes.
3. Test a point between your zeroes to find out if the solution interval is between them or on either side of them. (Try testing
by plugging it into your original inequality.)




Because the above statement is true, the solution is the interval between
and
.

1. Rewrite the equation in standard form.
2. Set the equation equal to and solve by factoring.
So, and
are our zeroes.
3. Test a point between your zeroes to find out if the solution interval is between them or on either side of them. (Try testing by plugging it into your original inequality.)
Because the above statement is true, the solution is the interval between and
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
What is the discriminant of the following quadratic equation: 
What is the discriminant of the following quadratic equation:
Tap to reveal answer
The discriminant of a quadratic equation in
form is equal to
. The given equation is not in that form however, so we must first multiply it out to get it into that form. We therefore obtain:




We therefore have
,
, and
. Our discriminant is therefore:

The correct answer is therefore 
The discriminant of a quadratic equation in form is equal to
. The given equation is not in that form however, so we must first multiply it out to get it into that form. We therefore obtain:
We therefore have ,
, and
. Our discriminant is therefore:
The correct answer is therefore
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve:

Solve:
Tap to reveal answer
Start by setting the inequality to zero and by solving for
.


Now, plot these two points on to a number line.

Notice that these two numbers effectively divide up the number line into three regions:
,
, and 
Now, choose a number in each of these regions and put it back in the factored inequality to see which cases are true.
For
, let 

Since this
is not less than
, the solution to this inequality cannot lie in this region.
For
, let
.

Since this will make the inequality true, the solution can lie in this region.
Finally, for
, let 

Since this number is not less than zero, the solution cannot lie in this region.
Thus, the solution to this inequality is 
Start by setting the inequality to zero and by solving for .
Now, plot these two points on to a number line.

Notice that these two numbers effectively divide up the number line into three regions:
,
, and
Now, choose a number in each of these regions and put it back in the factored inequality to see which cases are true.
For , let
Since this is not less than
, the solution to this inequality cannot lie in this region.
For , let
.
Since this will make the inequality true, the solution can lie in this region.
Finally, for , let
Since this number is not less than zero, the solution cannot lie in this region.
Thus, the solution to this inequality is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve:

Solve:
Tap to reveal answer
First, set the inequality to zero and solve for
.



Now, plot these two numbers on to a number line.

Notice how these numbers divide the number line into three regions:

Now, you will choose a number from each of these regions to test to plug back into the inequality to see if the inequality holds true.
For
, let 

Since this is not less than zero, the solution to the inequality cannot be found in this region.
For
, let 

Since this is less than zero, the solution is found in this region.
For
, let 

Since this is not less than zero, the solution is not found in this region.
Then, the solution for this inequality is 
First, set the inequality to zero and solve for .
Now, plot these two numbers on to a number line.

Notice how these numbers divide the number line into three regions:
Now, you will choose a number from each of these regions to test to plug back into the inequality to see if the inequality holds true.
For , let
Since this is not less than zero, the solution to the inequality cannot be found in this region.
For , let
Since this is less than zero, the solution is found in this region.
For , let
Since this is not less than zero, the solution is not found in this region.
Then, the solution for this inequality is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve:

Solve:
Tap to reveal answer
First, set the inequality to zero and solve for
.



Now, plot these two numbers on to a number line.

Notice how these numbers divide the number line into three regions:
![(-\infty, -5], [-5, $\frac{6}{7}$], [$\frac{6}{7}$, \infty)](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/333300/gif.latex)
Now, you will choose a number from each of these regions to test to plug back into the inequality to see if the inequality holds true.
For
, let 

Since this solution is greater than or equal to
, the solution can be found in this region.
For
, let 

Since this is less than or equal to
, the solution cannot be found in this region.
For
, let 

Since this is greater than or equal to
, the solution can be found in this region.
Because the solution can be found in every single region, the answer to this inequality is ![(-\infty, -5]\cup[$\frac{6}{7}$, \infty)](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/335026/gif.latex)
First, set the inequality to zero and solve for .
Now, plot these two numbers on to a number line.

Notice how these numbers divide the number line into three regions:
Now, you will choose a number from each of these regions to test to plug back into the inequality to see if the inequality holds true.
For , let
Since this solution is greater than or equal to , the solution can be found in this region.
For , let
Since this is less than or equal to , the solution cannot be found in this region.
For , let
Since this is greater than or equal to , the solution can be found in this region.
Because the solution can be found in every single region, the answer to this inequality is
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve:

Solve:
Tap to reveal answer
Start by changing the less than sign to an equal sign and solve for
.




Now, plot these two numbers on a number line.

Notice how the number line is divided into three regions:

Now, choose a number fromeach of these regions to plug back into the inequality to test if the inequality holds.
For
, let 

Since this number is not less than zero, the solution cannot be found in this region.
For
, let 

Since this number is less than zero, the solution can be found in this region.
For
let
.

Since this number is not less than zero, the solution cannot be found in this region.
Because the solution is only negative in the interval
, that must be the solution.
Start by changing the less than sign to an equal sign and solve for .
Now, plot these two numbers on a number line.

Notice how the number line is divided into three regions:
Now, choose a number fromeach of these regions to plug back into the inequality to test if the inequality holds.
For , let
Since this number is not less than zero, the solution cannot be found in this region.
For , let
Since this number is less than zero, the solution can be found in this region.
For let
.
Since this number is not less than zero, the solution cannot be found in this region.
Because the solution is only negative in the interval , that must be the solution.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Which value for
would satisfy the inequality
?
Which value for would satisfy the inequality
?
Tap to reveal answer
First, we can factor the quadratic to give us a better understanding of its graph. Factoring gives us:
. Now we know that the quadratic has zeros at
and
. Furthermore this information reveals that the quadratic is positive. Using this information, we can sketch a graph like this:

We can see that the parabola is below the x-axis (in other words, less than
) between these two zeros
and
.
The only x-value satisfying the inequality
is
.
The value of
would work if the inequality were inclusive, but since it is strictly less than instead of less than or equal to
, that value will not work.
First, we can factor the quadratic to give us a better understanding of its graph. Factoring gives us: . Now we know that the quadratic has zeros at
and
. Furthermore this information reveals that the quadratic is positive. Using this information, we can sketch a graph like this:

We can see that the parabola is below the x-axis (in other words, less than ) between these two zeros
and
.
The only x-value satisfying the inequality is
.
The value of would work if the inequality were inclusive, but since it is strictly less than instead of less than or equal to
, that value will not work.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
FOIL
.
FOIL .
Tap to reveal answer
(2x + 3)(x + 5)
First: 2x multiplied by x = 2x²
Outer: 2x multiplied by 5 = 10x
Inner: 3 multiplied by x = 3x
Lasts: 3 multiplied by 5 = 15
Put it all together: 2x² + 10x + 3x + 15
Simplify: 2x² + 13x + 15
(2x + 3)(x + 5)
First: 2x multiplied by x = 2x²
Outer: 2x multiplied by 5 = 10x
Inner: 3 multiplied by x = 3x
Lasts: 3 multiplied by 5 = 15
Put it all together: 2x² + 10x + 3x + 15
Simplify: 2x² + 13x + 15
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Foil:

Foil:
Tap to reveal answer
First: 
Outside: 
Inside: 
Last: 

First:
Outside:
Inside:
Last:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Use FOIL to distribute the following:

Use FOIL to distribute the following:
Tap to reveal answer
Make sure you keep track of negative signs when doing FOIL, especially when doing the Outer and Inner steps.
Make sure you keep track of negative signs when doing FOIL, especially when doing the Outer and Inner steps.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Use FOIL to distribute the following:

Use FOIL to distribute the following:
Tap to reveal answer
When the 2 terms differ only in their sign, the
-term drops out from the final product.
When the 2 terms differ only in their sign, the -term drops out from the final product.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate 
Evaluate
Tap to reveal answer
In order to evaluate
one needs to multiply the expression by itself using the laws of FOIL. In the foil method, one multiplies in the following order: first terms, outer terms, inner terms, and last terms.

Multiply terms by way of FOIL method.

Now multiply and simplify.


In order to evaluate one needs to multiply the expression by itself using the laws of FOIL. In the foil method, one multiplies in the following order: first terms, outer terms, inner terms, and last terms.
Multiply terms by way of FOIL method.
Now multiply and simplify.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Expand this expression:


Expand this expression:
Tap to reveal answer
Use the FOIL method (First, Outer, Inner, Last):




Put all of these terms together:

Combine like terms:

Use the FOIL method (First, Outer, Inner, Last):
Put all of these terms together:
Combine like terms:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Simplify:

Simplify:
Tap to reveal answer
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Use FOIL method to expand the product.

Use FOIL method to expand the product.
Tap to reveal answer
Remember that FOIL stands for First, Outside, Inside, Last.
Multiply using FOIL and group like terms.

Remember that FOIL stands for First, Outside, Inside, Last.
Multiply using FOIL and group like terms.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Expand the following expression:

Expand the following expression:
Tap to reveal answer
Expand the expression
using the FOIL Method:
FIRST: 
OUTER: 
INNER: 
LAST: 
Therefore:



Expand the expression using the FOIL Method:
FIRST:
OUTER:
INNER:
LAST:
Therefore:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Simplfy and combine like terms:

Simplfy and combine like terms:
Tap to reveal answer
For this problem we need to use FOIL which stands for Firsts, Outters, Inners, Last. This describes the order of distributing and multiplying the binomials.

Firsts gets us 
Outters gets us 
Inners gets us 
Lasts gets us 
Rewriting these in an equation form we get:

Now we combine the like terms of -10x and 3x which results in:

For this problem we need to use FOIL which stands for Firsts, Outters, Inners, Last. This describes the order of distributing and multiplying the binomials.
Firsts gets us
Outters gets us
Inners gets us
Lasts gets us
Rewriting these in an equation form we get:
Now we combine the like terms of -10x and 3x which results in:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →