What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Electoral Systems And Rules, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Comparative Government and Politics.
Study Electoral Systems And Rules in AP Comparative Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is tactical voting?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Voting for a less preferred but more viable candidate. Strategic voting for electable candidates over true preferences.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 46
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Electoral Systems And Rules, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Comparative Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Voting for a less preferred but more viable candidate. Strategic voting for electable candidates over true preferences.
Answer: First-Past-The-Post (FPTP). Similar candidates divide support, helping opponents win.
Answer: To prevent small parties from gaining seats. Sets minimum vote percentage required for parliamentary seats.
Answer: Reflects diverse political views more accurately. Seat distribution matches vote percentages across parties.
Answer: Requires more than 50% of votes to win. Ensures winner has broader support than plurality systems.
Answer: Ensure a candidate receives majority support. Forces broader consensus beyond initial plurality support.
Answer: Manipulating district boundaries for political advantage. Creates unfair electoral advantages through boundary manipulation.
Answer: Proportional representation. Proportional allocation encourages multiple viable parties.
Answer: A district where one party consistently wins. Predictable outcomes reduce competitive campaigning.
Answer: Does not require majority support to win. Winner may lack support from majority of voters.
Answer: Reflects diverse political views more accurately. Seat distribution matches vote percentages across parties.
Answer: Candidate with the most votes wins, no majority needed. Simple majority wins without needing over 50% support.
Answer: Proportional representation. STV uses ranked voting in multi-member districts.
Answer: Plurality systems lead to two-party systems. Winner-take-all systems discourage third-party competition.
Answer: Independent redistricting commissions. Neutral bodies reduce partisan boundary manipulation.
Answer: A rule for converting votes into seats. Mathematical method determining how votes become legislative seats.
Answer: A second round of voting if no candidate wins a majority. Eliminates candidates lacking majority support initially.
Answer: Combines elements of plurality and proportional systems. Seeks benefits of both local representation and proportionality.
Answer: Less representative electoral outcomes. Reduced participation weakens democratic legitimacy.
Answer: Candidate with the most votes wins, no majority needed. Simple majority wins without needing over 50% support.
Answer: First-Past-The-Post (FPTP). Each district elects one representative using plurality voting.
Answer: First-Past-The-Post (FPTP). Single-member districts with plurality winner determination.
Answer: Proportional representation. All votes contribute to party representation proportionally.
Answer: Proportional representation. Multiple seats per district enable proportional allocation.
Answer: Proportional representation. Fragmented parliaments necessitate multi-party agreements.
Answer: Instant Runoff Voting (IRV). Voters rank preferences; lowest eliminated until majority found.
Answer: Voters rank candidates by preference. Eliminates need for separate runoff elections.
Answer: Reduces the number of small parties in parliament. Eliminates parties with minimal electoral support.
Answer: Can lead to fragmented legislatures. Multiple small parties may complicate government formation.
Answer: Instant Runoff Voting (IRV). Voters rank preferences; lowest eliminated until majority found.
Answer: First-Past-The-Post (FPTP). Winner-take-all districts favor dominant party control.
Answer: Open-list proportional representation. Voters select both party and specific candidates.
Answer: Single Transferable Vote. Ranked-choice system for multi-member constituencies.
Answer: Proportional representation. Multiple seats per district enable proportional allocation.
Answer: Combines features of different electoral systems. Blends multiple electoral mechanisms for balanced outcomes.
Answer: Proportional representation. Fragmented representation often prevents single-party control.
Answer: Voters can influence candidate order in open-list. Open-list allows voters to select specific candidates.
Answer: A district where one party consistently wins. Predictable outcomes reduce competitive campaigning.
Answer: Less representative electoral outcomes. Reduced participation weakens democratic legitimacy.
Answer: First-Past-The-Post (FPTP). Votes for losing candidates don't contribute to representation.
Answer: Proportional representation. Fragmented representation often prevents single-party control.
Answer: Balances proportionality and local representation. Combines constituency links with proportional outcomes.
Answer: Reduces vote splitting and increases legitimacy. Ensures winner has broader support than plurality.
Answer: Can lead to fragmented legislatures. Multiple small parties may complicate government formation.
Answer: To allocate seats based on vote percentage. Ensures legislative seats match party vote shares proportionally.
Answer: Unequal representation due to uneven district sizes. Population imbalances create unequal voting power.