What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Objectives Of Election Rules, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Comparative Government and Politics.
Study Objectives Of Election Rules in AP Comparative Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the key objective of single non-transferable vote (SNTV)?
Tap card or press Space to flip
To elect multiple representatives in a single district. Multiple winners chosen from single district without vote transfers.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 62
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Objectives Of Election Rules, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Comparative Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: To elect multiple representatives in a single district. Multiple winners chosen from single district without vote transfers.
Answer: Proportional representation. Seats allocated to match each party's share of total votes.
Answer: To simulate a series of runoffs in a single election. Automatically eliminates lowest candidates and redistributes their votes.
Answer: They combine FPTP and proportional representation. Voters cast two ballots: one for local candidate, one for party.
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP). Winner-take-all typically gives one party full control of government.
Answer: To prevent very small parties from gaining seats. Minimum vote percentage required prevents legislative fragmentation.
Answer: Ranked-choice voting. Ranking prevents third-party votes from helping least-preferred candidate win.
Answer: To give voters influence over candidate selection. Voters can reorder party candidate lists based on personal preferences.
Answer: To improve representation and fairness in elections. Changes electoral rules to better reflect voter preferences and participation.
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP). Candidate with most votes wins all representation for that district.
Answer: To manipulate district boundaries for electoral advantage. Redrawing districts to favor specific parties or candidates unfairly.
Answer: Mixed-member proportional (MMP). Combines direct district representation with proportional party representation.
Answer: Parties determine the order of candidates on the list. Party leadership controls which candidates get priority for seats.
Answer: To combine proportionality with individual candidate choice. Voters rank individual candidates within proportional multi-member districts.
Answer: To simulate a series of runoffs in a single election. Automatically eliminates lowest candidates and redistributes their votes.
Answer: To allow voters to rank candidates in order of preference. Voters indicate first, second, third choices instead of single selection.
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP). Winner-take-all can give parties more seats than their vote share.
Answer: Ranked-choice voting. Ranking prevents third-party votes from helping least-preferred candidate win.
Answer: To provide clear accountability to constituents. One representative per district creates direct voter-candidate relationship.
Answer: To combine elements of majoritarian and proportional systems. Blends winner-take-all districts with proportional representation mechanisms.
Answer: To increase voter turnout. Legal requirement removes choice barrier and boosts participation rates.
Answer: Mixed-member proportional (MMP). Combines direct district representation with proportional party representation.
Answer: To increase voter turnout. Legal requirement removes choice barrier and boosts participation rates.
Answer: Coalition governments are more likely. Multiple parties gain seats, requiring cooperation to form government.
Answer: To increase proportionality and representativeness. More seats per district allow smaller parties to gain representation.
Answer: To improve representation and fairness in elections. Changes electoral rules to better reflect voter preferences and participation.
Answer: Parties determine the order of candidates on the list. Party leadership controls which candidates get priority for seats.
Answer: They combine FPTP and proportional representation. Voters cast two ballots: one for local candidate, one for party.
Answer: To ensure broad representation of the electorate. Mandatory participation ensures all demographic groups influence outcomes.
Answer: To elect the candidate with the most votes. Highest vote total wins regardless of whether it's a majority.
Answer: Proportional representation. Multiple seats per district enable proportional seat allocation.
Answer: Voters rank candidates and points are assigned based on rank. Points awarded by preference ranking determine overall winner mathematically.
Answer: It reduces the likelihood of wasted votes. Voters' lower preferences count if their first choice is eliminated.
Answer: To formally elect the president and vice president. Intermediary body between popular vote and final presidential selection.
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP). Winner-take-all mechanics favor large parties and discourage smaller ones.
Answer: To allocate seats in proportion to the votes each party receives. This system distributes seats based on vote percentages rather than winner-take-all.
Answer: To ensure the winner has a majority of votes. Requires candidates to receive over 50% of votes to win legitimately.
Answer: Single non-transferable vote (SNTV). One vote per voter elects multiple candidates in multi-member districts.
Answer: Coalition governments are more likely. Multiple parties gain seats, requiring cooperation to form government.
Answer: D'Hondt method. Mathematical formula converts vote percentages into seat allocations fairly.
Answer: Proportional representation. Seat distribution reflects vote percentages, encouraging coalition building.
Answer: To formally elect the president and vice president. Intermediary body between popular vote and final presidential selection.
Answer: Voters rank candidates and points are assigned based on rank. Points awarded by preference ranking determine overall winner mathematically.
Answer: To elect the candidate with the most votes. Highest vote total wins regardless of whether it's a majority.
Answer: To give voters influence over candidate selection. Voters can reorder party candidate lists based on personal preferences.
Answer: To prevent very small parties from gaining seats. Minimum vote percentage required prevents legislative fragmentation.
Answer: D'Hondt method. Mathematical formula converts vote percentages into seat allocations fairly.
Answer: To combine elements of majoritarian and proportional systems. Blends winner-take-all districts with proportional representation mechanisms.
Answer: Proportional representation. Seat distribution reflects vote percentages, encouraging coalition building.
Answer: To increase proportionality and representativeness. More seats per district allow smaller parties to gain representation.
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP). Winner-take-all can give parties more seats than their vote share.
Answer: To enhance representation of underrepresented groups. Reserved seats or candidate requirements increase minority representation.
Answer: To achieve a majority winner when no candidate wins outright. Forces a second round between top candidates when none gets majority.
Answer: To ensure a majority winner through a second round if needed. Eliminates candidates below 50% and holds runoff between top two.
Answer: To ensure a majority winner by allowing second preferences. Uses first and second preferences to ensure majority support for winner.
Answer: Single non-transferable vote (SNTV). One vote per voter elects multiple candidates in multi-member districts.
Answer: To ensure a majority winner by allowing second preferences. Uses first and second preferences to ensure majority support for winner.
Answer: To ensure a majority winner through a second round if needed. Eliminates candidates below 50% and holds runoff between top two.
Answer: Proportional representation. Seat allocation matches vote distribution more closely than FPTP.
Answer: First-past-the-post (FPTP). Voters choose major parties to prevent their vote from being ineffective.
Answer: To allocate seats in proportion to the votes each party receives. This system distributes seats based on vote percentages rather than winner-take-all.
Answer: To elect multiple representatives in a single district. Multiple winners chosen from single district without vote transfers.