DAT Quantitative Reasoning · Question of the Day

DAT Quantitative Reasoning Question of the Day

A fresh daily question to build accuracy, reinforce recall, and turn practice into a steady habit.
Friday, October 23, 2026

An orthodontic order contained small and large brackets in a ratio of 3 : 5. If 360 brackets were ordered in total, how many were large?

Keep practicing DAT Quantitative Reasoning

Question of the Day

Answer today's DAT Quantitative Reasoning question, reveal the full explanation, then keep the streak going with a new question every day.

An orthodontic order contained small and large brackets in a ratio of 3 : 5. If 360 brackets were ordered in total, how many were large?

  1. 135
  2. 180
  3. 225 (correct answer)
  4. 240

Explanation: Ratio problems test your ability to work with proportional relationships. When you see a ratio like 3:5, think of it as representing parts of a whole rather than actual quantities. The ratio 3:5 means that for every 3 small brackets, there are 5 large brackets. This gives us a total of 3 + 5 = 8 parts in the ratio. Since 360 brackets were ordered total, each part represents 3608=45\frac{360}{8} = 45 brackets. Large brackets make up 5 parts of the ratio, so the number of large brackets is 5×45=2255 \times 45 = 225. You can verify this: small brackets would be 3×45=1353 \times 45 = 135, and 135+225=360135 + 225 = 360 ✓ Looking at the wrong answers: A) 135 is the number of small brackets, not large ones—this represents the classic trap of solving for the wrong part of the ratio. B) 180 would result if you incorrectly calculated each part as 36010=36\frac{360}{10} = 36 (perhaps by adding an extra step), then multiplied by 5. D) 240 comes from miscalculating the total parts as 6 instead of 8, giving 3606=60\frac{360}{6} = 60 per part, then 60×4=24060 \times 4 = 240—but this uses the wrong ratio interpretation entirely. The key strategy for ratio problems: always find the total number of parts first, then determine what each part represents. Double-check by ensuring your parts add up to the given total. This systematic approach prevents the common mistake of solving for the wrong component.