Word Problems - GMAT Quantitative

The total time is calculated by the equation . Statement 2 provides the rate, but we have no information regarding distance, therefore, the quesiton is impossible to solve without more information.

From the first statement, we can calculate the number of cupcakes Cassie can decorate in 150 minutes. From there, we can calculate the rate at which Derek decorates. Therefore, Statement 1 alone is sufficient to answer the question.

The second statement gives the rate at which Derek decorates cupcakes. Therefore, Statement 2 alone is also sufficient to answer the question.

The rate formula - or, actually, the equivalent equation - will help.

Let be the speed limits along the interstate, the first half of the state route, and the second half of the state route, respectively.

Then Tom can drive I-10 in hours; the first half of SR 34, ; the second half of SR 34, .

The time it takes, in hours, for Tom to make the entire trip is the sum of these fractions:

.

To calculate , we need . Statement 1 only tells us ; Statement 2 only tells us and . Therefore, both together, but neither alone, are enough to allow us to calculate .

Statement 1 alone does not tell us enough about the speed of train B to answer the question. Statement 2 alone does not tell us about the rates of either individual train, so it is also not sufficient by itself to answer the question.

But can we figure out the answer using both pieces of information? Yes, we can! If we know that the trains meet at 6:40, then their combined rate of travel is 60 total miles in 40 minutes. Statement 1 says that Train A travels twice as fast as Train B, so we can determine the distances covered by the two trains in those 40 minutes. From there, we can find rates for both trains and then answer the question. Thus, both statements together are sufficient to answer the question, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Note: We didn't actually answer the question of Train B's arrival time. For data sufficiency questions, don't waste time trying to find the specific answer. All that is necessary is determining whether or not it is POSSIBLE to answer the question with the information given.

Here we can see that there are two people painting the house, so we should set the following equation : , where is the rate for Jake and where is the rate for Colin, stands for their rate together. Statement one gives us a value for and even though it doesn't tell us what is or it tells us that which allow us to answer the question.

For Statement 2, we are left with two other unknowns in our equation and we can clearly see that (2) is not sufficient.

We should start by setting equations and , these are the two equation we should be able to solve. Where is the amount of the work they did togetherm is the amount of work left, is Celine's rate and is the rate of Celine and Jack together. So with we can see that we would need both Jack and Celine's rate. Since they work at a different rate, we shoud only be able to answer this problem taking both statements together.

To be able to solve this problem, we need to figure out where is the rate of machine X and is the rate of machine Y. Statement 1 tells us the rate for machine X, but tells us as well that it takes 2 more hours for machine Y to produce the same amount of screwdrivers. Therefore, we are told that and , which is sufficient to answer the question. Statement 2 tells us that the rate of machine Y is and also that that rate of machine X is 3 times as fast as machine Y: so .

Each statement alone is therefore sufficient.

To solve this problem we first have to set up an equation for our variables: where is the rate of machine O and is the rate of machine P.

The first statement tells us that and , where is the time it takes machine O to produce 880 telephones.

At first it might look insufficient but, by pluging in the values for and in our first equation we get :

, this gives us a quadratic equation, in which we can solve and find t, and therefore find the number of telephones O can produce in 1 hour.

The second statement tell us that , therefore, we can plug in this value in our first equation to find the rate for machine O and this will allow us to answer the question.

Firstly we should set up an equation for this problem: where are the respective rates of machines A, B and C. We need to find .

Statement 1 tells us that .

This alone is not suffient since we will have no precise information on machine B. Similarly, with statement 2 We can find the value of the rate for machine B but we cannot know what is the rate of machine C, from what we are told. However, taking both statements together, with statement 1 we can find the value for and with statement 2 we can find the value for and thereby we can find the value of .

We know that there are 16 machines and we are looking for how many we should add. Let us set an equation representing the number of machines in use , where is the total number of machines we need and is the rate of an individual machine. We should therefore find a rate for a single machine to be able to solve this problem, since we can then calculate .

Statement 1 tells us that for 16 machines, it takes 5 hours to produce a necklace. From this we can find the rate of a single machine.

Statement 2 tells us direclty the rate of a single machine, therefore both these statements allow us to answer the problem.

For these types of problems, asking us how long it takes for a vehicle to catch up to another one, we should keep in mind that we can calculate the rate at which the other vehicle is catching up, by doing the difference of the two rates.

From this we can see that we will need both rates for the vehicles as well as the distance between the two vehicles: , where and are the respective rates of vehicles B and A, and is the distance between the two cars and is the time it would take for car B to catch up

Statement 1 only tells us the distance between the two vehicle and therefore we don't know how fast car B is catching up and therefore this statement alone is insufficient.

Statement 2 only tells us how fast is the second car going, but here we don't know what is the distance between the two cars.

Therefore, both statements must be taken together to answer this question.

Since the problem doesn't tell us anything about the rates and the distance between the two train, there is not much we can say. Statement one tells us that there is 180 miles between the two trains. This is not sufficient, since we don't know how fast the trains are.

Statement 2 alone tells us the rates of the trains, but we don't know how far away they are, this statement alone doesn't help us answer the question.

If we take both statements together however, we can see that the distance that each train would have made when both trains meet, is a total of 180 miles, since both trains were 180 miles away.

We can create the following equation , where is the time it takes for both train to meet at a given point and and are the trains A and B respective rates. The information we have allows us to solve the equation for and therefore we can answer the problem.

Firstly, we should remember that the average rate is given by the following formula , where is the total distance and is the total time. So to answer this question we should find a value for . can only be found by adding the two times for both trips. By pluging in the values we can find a value for , therefore we need both statements.

To solve this problem, we need to find the rate of the train considering the fact that the rails are damaged. The first statement tells us only the usual rate of the train and is therefore not sufficient because we don't know how fast the train will be going on the damaged portions of the railroad.

Statement two only tells us that the train must progress at a rate half as slow as its usual rate.

Using statements 1 and 2 we can easily find the rate which is given by . Note that this rate is given in miles per minutes but we don't have to calculate it, we just need to know that we can calculate it.

Since we are told an average speed for a round trip we should be able to set the following equation , where is the distance of a one way and is the total time of the round trip and is the average speed of the plane.

Statement 1 tells us that it took the plane twice as long to do the first portion of the round trip, therefore we can figure out from this statement, indeed, where is the time it took to do the second portion of the trip. Therefore, . Since is the rate for the second portion of the trip, we can figure it out by pluging in the values , which is sufficient to answer the problem.

Statement 2 tells us that the plane was flying at a speed of , this alone answers the question.

First of all, we should notice that we are looking for a rate and therefore, we should be able to find both a distance and a time for the train to travel that distance.

From statement 1, we can say that and that where is train A's rate and is the time it takes train B to travel 180 miles. If we manipulate our equations we get : , since 180 are in both equations. But there are two unknowns and neither cancel out. So statement 1 alone is not sufficient.

Statement 2 gives us a rate for train A for an unknown distance, therefore this information is not useful.

We can see that after using our statements, even together, we still could not find an answer to the problem, therefore statements 1 and 2 together are insufficient.

Using statement (1), the value of i cannot be determined because t is not specified.

Therefore Statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient.

Using statement (2), the value of i can be determined:

We can then set the following equation with X being the amount of money Jenna has to invest today:

We calculate X as follows:

In order to know how much money is in an account after compound interest is accrued, one thing that must be known is the principal, or amount invested.

Statement 2 is unhelpful, since information from 2013 is not relevant to information for 2014.

From Statement 1 we only know her 2014 earnings, not her December earnings (it is not given that she earned the same per month in 2014). Therefore, the two statements together provide insufficient information.

In order to know how much money is in an account after compound interest is accrued, the following must be known:

The amount of principal, which is given as $3,000 (Natasha's Christmas bonus) only in Statement 1;

The amount of time over which interest is accrued, which is stated to be five years in the main body of the problem;

The frequency with which the interest is compounded, which is given as monthly in the main body of the problem; and,

The rate of interest, which is given as 2.15% in the main body of the problem.

Statement 1 alone provides sufficient information to allow the answer to be calculated. Statement 2 is irrelevant, since it provides no information about Natasha's Christmas bonus.

In order to know how much money is in an account after compound interest is accrued, the following must be known:

The amount of principal, which is given as $10,000 only in Statement 1;

The amount of time over which interest is accrued, which is stated to be five years in the main body of the problem;

The frequency with which the interest is compounded, which is given as quarterly only in Statement 2; and,

The rate of interest, which is given as 2.12% only in Statement 2.

Therefore, both statements together are necessary and sufficient to answer the question.