Mendel and Inheritance Patterns - MCAT Biological and Biochemical Foundations of Living Systems
Card 0 of 384
A certain type of plant is only tall when it has a heterozygous genotype. If two heterozygous plants are crossed, what is the probability their offspring will also be tall?
A certain type of plant is only tall when it has a heterozygous genotype. If two heterozygous plants are crossed, what is the probability their offspring will also be tall?
Tap to see back →
The cross between two heterozygous plants (Tt and Tt) will result in 25% TT, 50% Tt and 25% tt.
The cross between two heterozygous plants (Tt and Tt) will result in 25% TT, 50% Tt and 25% tt.
If two parents do not have cystic fibrosis but are carriers for the disease, what are their odds of having a child with cystic fibrosis?
If two parents do not have cystic fibrosis but are carriers for the disease, what are their odds of having a child with cystic fibrosis?
Tap to see back →
Carriers are heterozygotes. In the case of recessive inheritance, a carrier will not know that they are carrying a single allele for the disease. In the Punnett Square, crossing two heterozygotes will result in 25% homozygous dominant and 50% heterozygous carriers, with 25% homozygous recessive who will have cystic fibrosis
Carriers are heterozygotes. In the case of recessive inheritance, a carrier will not know that they are carrying a single allele for the disease. In the Punnett Square, crossing two heterozygotes will result in 25% homozygous dominant and 50% heterozygous carriers, with 25% homozygous recessive who will have cystic fibrosis
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy is an X-linked recessive genetic disorder, resulting in the loss of the dystrophin protein. In healthy muscle, dystrophin localizes to the sarcolemma and helps anchor the muscle fiber to the basal lamina. The loss of this protein results in progressive muscle weakness, and eventually death.
In the muscle fibers, the effects of the disease can be exacerbated by auto-immune interference. Weakness of the sarcolemma leads to damage and tears in the membrane. The body’s immune system recognizes the damage and attempts to repair it. However, since the damage exists as a chronic condition, leukocytes begin to present the damaged protein fragments as antigens, stimulating a targeted attack on the damaged parts of the muscle fiber. The attack causes inflammation, fibrosis, and necrosis, further weakening the muscle.
Studies have shown that despite the severe pathology of the muscle fibers, the innervation of the muscle is unaffected.
A young girl is diagnosed with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, and her mother is pregnant with a baby boy. Which of the following must be true?
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy is an X-linked recessive genetic disorder, resulting in the loss of the dystrophin protein. In healthy muscle, dystrophin localizes to the sarcolemma and helps anchor the muscle fiber to the basal lamina. The loss of this protein results in progressive muscle weakness, and eventually death.
In the muscle fibers, the effects of the disease can be exacerbated by auto-immune interference. Weakness of the sarcolemma leads to damage and tears in the membrane. The body’s immune system recognizes the damage and attempts to repair it. However, since the damage exists as a chronic condition, leukocytes begin to present the damaged protein fragments as antigens, stimulating a targeted attack on the damaged parts of the muscle fiber. The attack causes inflammation, fibrosis, and necrosis, further weakening the muscle.
Studies have shown that despite the severe pathology of the muscle fibers, the innervation of the muscle is unaffected.
A young girl is diagnosed with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, and her mother is pregnant with a baby boy. Which of the following must be true?
Tap to see back →
The passage tells us that the disease gene is X-linked and recessive. If the young girl has the disease, then she must have a double recessive genotype, meaning that both of her parents have at least one recessive gene. Her mother must either be a carrier, or have the disease, but we cannot conclude one over the other. Her father must have the disease, since he only has one copy of the X-chromosome. He received his Y chromosome from his father, so we cannot make any judgments about the father's father. He received his X chromosome from his mother, meaning that she must have been a carrier or had the disease. As far as the unborn brother is concerned, he has a 50% chance of getting the disease if the mother is a carrier, and 100% if she has the disease.
The only thing we can say with 100% certainty is that the father has the disease.
The passage tells us that the disease gene is X-linked and recessive. If the young girl has the disease, then she must have a double recessive genotype, meaning that both of her parents have at least one recessive gene. Her mother must either be a carrier, or have the disease, but we cannot conclude one over the other. Her father must have the disease, since he only has one copy of the X-chromosome. He received his Y chromosome from his father, so we cannot make any judgments about the father's father. He received his X chromosome from his mother, meaning that she must have been a carrier or had the disease. As far as the unborn brother is concerned, he has a 50% chance of getting the disease if the mother is a carrier, and 100% if she has the disease.
The only thing we can say with 100% certainty is that the father has the disease.
Prions are the suspected cause of a wide variety of neurodegenerative diseases in mammals. According to prevailing theory, prions are infectious particles made only of protein and found in high concentrations in the brains of infected animals. All mammals produce normal prion protein, PrPC, a transmembrane protein whose function remains unclear.
Infectious prions, PrPRes, induce conformational changes in the existing PrPC proteins according to the following reaction:
PrPC + PrPRes → PrPRes + PrPRes
The PrPRes is then suspected to accumulate in the nervous tissue of infected patients and cause disease. This model of transmission generates replicated proteins, but does so bypassing the standard model of the central dogma of molecular biology. Transcription and translation apparently do not play a role in this replication process.
This theory is a major departure from previously established biological dogma. A scientist decides to test the protein-only theory of prion propagation. He establishes his experiment as follows:
Homogenized brain matter of infected rabbits is injected into the brains of healthy rabbits, as per the following table:
Rabbit 1 and 2: injected with normal saline on days 1 and 2
The above trials serve as controls.
Rabbit 3 and 4: injected with homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use unmodified brain matter.
Rabbit 5 and 6: injected with irradiated homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use brain matter that has been irradiated to destroy nucleic acids in the homogenate.
Rabbit 7 and 8: injected with protein-free centrifuged homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use brain matter that has been centrifuged to generate a protein-free homogenate and a protein-rich homogenate based on molecular weight.
Rabbit 9 and 10: injected with boiled homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use brain matter that have been boiled to destroy any bacterial contaminants in the homogenate.
Some patients have a predisposition to developing neurodegenerative disease due to genetic mutations in the PrPC gene. If a father knows that he has the mutation, but never develops the disease, and the mother knows she is not a carrier, what is the probability that their son will develop the disease? Assume that this disease follows simple Mendelian inheritance patterns.
Prions are the suspected cause of a wide variety of neurodegenerative diseases in mammals. According to prevailing theory, prions are infectious particles made only of protein and found in high concentrations in the brains of infected animals. All mammals produce normal prion protein, PrPC, a transmembrane protein whose function remains unclear.
Infectious prions, PrPRes, induce conformational changes in the existing PrPC proteins according to the following reaction:
PrPC + PrPRes → PrPRes + PrPRes
The PrPRes is then suspected to accumulate in the nervous tissue of infected patients and cause disease. This model of transmission generates replicated proteins, but does so bypassing the standard model of the central dogma of molecular biology. Transcription and translation apparently do not play a role in this replication process.
This theory is a major departure from previously established biological dogma. A scientist decides to test the protein-only theory of prion propagation. He establishes his experiment as follows:
Homogenized brain matter of infected rabbits is injected into the brains of healthy rabbits, as per the following table:
Rabbit 1 and 2: injected with normal saline on days 1 and 2
The above trials serve as controls.
Rabbit 3 and 4: injected with homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use unmodified brain matter.
Rabbit 5 and 6: injected with irradiated homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use brain matter that has been irradiated to destroy nucleic acids in the homogenate.
Rabbit 7 and 8: injected with protein-free centrifuged homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use brain matter that has been centrifuged to generate a protein-free homogenate and a protein-rich homogenate based on molecular weight.
Rabbit 9 and 10: injected with boiled homogenized brain matter on days 1 and 2
The above trials use brain matter that have been boiled to destroy any bacterial contaminants in the homogenate.
Some patients have a predisposition to developing neurodegenerative disease due to genetic mutations in the PrPC gene. If a father knows that he has the mutation, but never develops the disease, and the mother knows she is not a carrier, what is the probability that their son will develop the disease? Assume that this disease follows simple Mendelian inheritance patterns.
Tap to see back →
This is a simple Mendelian recessive trait. It must be recessive if the father is a carrier but never affected.
This is a simple Mendelian recessive trait. It must be recessive if the father is a carrier but never affected.
In peas, the gene for yellow color (C) is dominant to the gene for green color (c). To determine the genotype of an unknown yellow pea, what kind of pea should you cross with it?
In peas, the gene for yellow color (C) is dominant to the gene for green color (c). To determine the genotype of an unknown yellow pea, what kind of pea should you cross with it?
Tap to see back →
We are unsure if our yellow pea is homozygous dominant (CC) or heterozygous (Cc). Crossing it with a homozygous recessive (cc) green pea will yield only yellow peas if it is homozygous dominant, or a mix of green and yellow if it is heterozygous. We could also cross it with a known heterozygote, as we would see the same pattern as if we had crossed with a homozygous recessive.
We are unsure if our yellow pea is homozygous dominant (CC) or heterozygous (Cc). Crossing it with a homozygous recessive (cc) green pea will yield only yellow peas if it is homozygous dominant, or a mix of green and yellow if it is heterozygous. We could also cross it with a known heterozygote, as we would see the same pattern as if we had crossed with a homozygous recessive.
A botanist sees that when he breeds a plants with blue flowers with a plant with red flowers, the resulting generation are plants that all have a 1 : 1 ratio of blue : red flowers. He knows that the two parents are homozygous for the trait of color. What phenomenon most likely explains the 1 : 1 ratio in the filial generation?
A botanist sees that when he breeds a plants with blue flowers with a plant with red flowers, the resulting generation are plants that all have a 1 : 1 ratio of blue : red flowers. He knows that the two parents are homozygous for the trait of color. What phenomenon most likely explains the 1 : 1 ratio in the filial generation?
Tap to see back →
Codominance occurs when each allele for a certain gene isn't completely dominant over the other, so both are expressed. We see both fully blue and fully red flowers on each plant, so codominance fits our situation in this question. Incomplete dominance would be the correct answer if the filial plants had flowers that were a combination of blue and red, so they would be purple. Expressivity is the term for when a trait is expressed to different degrees in a population, like some plants having flowers that are more blue than others. Penetrance is when only a certain percentage of the population expresses the trait at all.
Codominance occurs when each allele for a certain gene isn't completely dominant over the other, so both are expressed. We see both fully blue and fully red flowers on each plant, so codominance fits our situation in this question. Incomplete dominance would be the correct answer if the filial plants had flowers that were a combination of blue and red, so they would be purple. Expressivity is the term for when a trait is expressed to different degrees in a population, like some plants having flowers that are more blue than others. Penetrance is when only a certain percentage of the population expresses the trait at all.
In a dihybrid cross, what fraction of offspring will display both recessive phenotypes?
In a dihybrid cross, what fraction of offspring will display both recessive phenotypes?
Tap to see back →
The correct answer is 1/16. A dihybrid cross results in a phenotypic ratio of 9:3:3:1. The 1 in the ratio is indicative of the double recessive phenotype, with a homozygous recessive genotype for both traits. Thus, only 1/16 of the offspring will display both recessive phenotypes.
The correct answer is 1/16. A dihybrid cross results in a phenotypic ratio of 9:3:3:1. The 1 in the ratio is indicative of the double recessive phenotype, with a homozygous recessive genotype for both traits. Thus, only 1/16 of the offspring will display both recessive phenotypes.
The pattern of inheritance of Syndrome V has been documented in a family. According to the pedigree shown below, which mode of inheritance cannot explain the pattern?
The pattern of inheritance of Syndrome V has been documented in a family. According to the pedigree shown below, which mode of inheritance cannot explain the pattern?
Tap to see back →
This problem asks you to use concepts of inheritance and Mendelian genetics. The best approach to this problem is to rule out possiblities rather than to find the actual mode of inheritance, as the latter can be a much more difficult and time-consuming process. First off, we know that Y-linked inheritance could not explain this pattern because we see that in generation 1 (G1), the male is affected. If he is affected, all of his sons (who inherit his Y chromosome) would also be affected. There is one son in G2 who is not. Similarly, dominant X-linked inheritance could not explain this pattern; recall that the daughters inherit two copies of the X chromosome, and one is always inactivated. Were the trait X-linked dominant, then the girls of generation 3 (G3) would be affected, having received a copy of the affected gene from their father. Revisiting all other options, we see that any of the remaining inheritance patterns could possibly explain what we see.
This problem asks you to use concepts of inheritance and Mendelian genetics. The best approach to this problem is to rule out possiblities rather than to find the actual mode of inheritance, as the latter can be a much more difficult and time-consuming process. First off, we know that Y-linked inheritance could not explain this pattern because we see that in generation 1 (G1), the male is affected. If he is affected, all of his sons (who inherit his Y chromosome) would also be affected. There is one son in G2 who is not. Similarly, dominant X-linked inheritance could not explain this pattern; recall that the daughters inherit two copies of the X chromosome, and one is always inactivated. Were the trait X-linked dominant, then the girls of generation 3 (G3) would be affected, having received a copy of the affected gene from their father. Revisiting all other options, we see that any of the remaining inheritance patterns could possibly explain what we see.
A man with type A– blood and a woman with type AB+ blood have a child. Which blood type is impossible for that child to have?
A man with type A– blood and a woman with type AB+ blood have a child. Which blood type is impossible for that child to have?
Tap to see back →
Blood type is inherited as a codominant trait and relies on alleles for blood antibodies as well as Rh (Rhesus) factor. The father's blood type is A–, so he has no Rh factor and must be either AA or AO. The mother must be AB with an Rh factor.
Father possibilities: A-A- or A-O-
Mother possibilities: A-B+ or A+B- or A+B+
Based on these possibilities, we cannot conclude if the child will be positive or negative for Rh factor; however, since the mother has no allele for O blood type, we can conclude that the child cannot have O type blood. The child could receive AA, AO, BO, or AB.
Blood type is inherited as a codominant trait and relies on alleles for blood antibodies as well as Rh (Rhesus) factor. The father's blood type is A–, so he has no Rh factor and must be either AA or AO. The mother must be AB with an Rh factor.
Father possibilities: A-A- or A-O-
Mother possibilities: A-B+ or A+B- or A+B+
Based on these possibilities, we cannot conclude if the child will be positive or negative for Rh factor; however, since the mother has no allele for O blood type, we can conclude that the child cannot have O type blood. The child could receive AA, AO, BO, or AB.
A woman is a carrier for a sex-linked disorder. She marries a man whose father had the disorder, and whose mother did not. The man is unaffected. If they have a child, what is the probability that the child is also a carrier?
A woman is a carrier for a sex-linked disorder. She marries a man whose father had the disorder, and whose mother did not. The man is unaffected. If they have a child, what is the probability that the child is also a carrier?
Tap to see back →
In order for the woman to be a carrier, the disorder must be X-linked recessive, and the woman must be heterozygous for the allele. The information about the man's parents becomes irrelevant as soon as we know that he does not have the disorder. Males only carry one copy of the X-chromosome; thus, for the man to be unaffected, he must carry the dominant, unaffected allele. Now we know that the woman's genotype is 
and the man's is 
, where 
represented the affected allele. The Punnett square for this couple is drawn below.
Males cannot be carriers for X-linked traits, as they only carry one copy of the X-chromosome; thus, we are looking only at daughters (50%). Of the daughters, 50% will be heterozygous for the trait (). There is a one in four chance the child will be a female who is a carrier, or 25%.
In order for the woman to be a carrier, the disorder must be X-linked recessive, and the woman must be heterozygous for the allele. The information about the man's parents becomes irrelevant as soon as we know that he does not have the disorder. Males only carry one copy of the X-chromosome; thus, for the man to be unaffected, he must carry the dominant, unaffected allele. Now we know that the woman's genotype is
Males cannot be carriers for X-linked traits, as they only carry one copy of the X-chromosome; thus, we are looking only at daughters (50%). Of the daughters, 50% will be heterozygous for the trait (
A mother is homozygous for blood type A and a father has blood type AB. Which of the following could describe their child's blood type?
A mother is homozygous for blood type A and a father has blood type AB. Which of the following could describe their child's blood type?
Tap to see back →
We are told that the mother is homozygous for blood type A (AA) and the father has blood type AB (AB). Using a simple punnett squre we can find that 50% of the offspring would be blood type A and 50% would be blood type AB.
We are told that the mother is homozygous for blood type A (AA) and the father has blood type AB (AB). Using a simple punnett squre we can find that 50% of the offspring would be blood type A and 50% would be blood type AB.
Sickle cell anemia is an autosomal recessive trait. If a mother, who is a carrier of the trait, mates with a man who is also a carrier of the trait, what is the possibility that a boy born to the couple will have the disease?
Sickle cell anemia is an autosomal recessive trait. If a mother, who is a carrier of the trait, mates with a man who is also a carrier of the trait, what is the possibility that a boy born to the couple will have the disease?
Tap to see back →
There is a 25% chance that a child, regardless of sex, will have the disease. Sickle cell anemia is an autosomal recessive trait, so female and male offsprings are affected equally. Two carriers that mate will have a 25% chance of having a child with the disease, 50% chance of having a child who is also a carrier, and 25% chance of having a child who is normal, meaning he/she has two normal alleles. This can be seen by drawing a Punnett square for two heterozygous parents.
There is a 25% chance that a child, regardless of sex, will have the disease. Sickle cell anemia is an autosomal recessive trait, so female and male offsprings are affected equally. Two carriers that mate will have a 25% chance of having a child with the disease, 50% chance of having a child who is also a carrier, and 25% chance of having a child who is normal, meaning he/she has two normal alleles. This can be seen by drawing a Punnett square for two heterozygous parents.
Red-green colorblindness is an X-linked recessive disorder. Jacob's paternal grandfather and father are both colorblind, but his mother has two normal alleles. What is the probability that Jacob is red-green colorblind?
Red-green colorblindness is an X-linked recessive disorder. Jacob's paternal grandfather and father are both colorblind, but his mother has two normal alleles. What is the probability that Jacob is red-green colorblind?
Tap to see back →
To answer this question, you must have a basic knowledge of sex-linked disease genetics. Men are much more likely to suffer from X-linked disorders; unlike women, they have only one X chromosome, and therefore do not have a second copy that can compensate for the affected one. A man cannot, however, inherit a defective X chromosome from his father, because fathers pass on their Y chromosome to their sons. So, Jacob must inherit one of his mother's healthy X chromosomes, and there is no chance that he will be colorblind.
To answer this question, you must have a basic knowledge of sex-linked disease genetics. Men are much more likely to suffer from X-linked disorders; unlike women, they have only one X chromosome, and therefore do not have a second copy that can compensate for the affected one. A man cannot, however, inherit a defective X chromosome from his father, because fathers pass on their Y chromosome to their sons. So, Jacob must inherit one of his mother's healthy X chromosomes, and there is no chance that he will be colorblind.
Suppose two individuals with the genotypes PPQqRr and ppQqrr mate. What is the probability that their offspring will display the genotype PpQQRr?
Suppose two individuals with the genotypes PPQqRr and ppQqrr mate. What is the probability that their offspring will display the genotype PpQQRr?
Tap to see back →
While this question looks complicated it can be broken down into three individual Punnett squares, and the probability of each of the three individual allele genotypes can be multiplied to give the desired answer.
Starting with P: Parent 1 is homozygous dominant (PP) and parent 2 is homozygous recessive (pp), therefore 100% of their offspring will be heterozygous (Pp), or 1/1.
For Q: Both parents are heterozygous (Qq); therefore 1/4 of their offspring will be QQ, 1/2 will be Qq, and 1/4 will be qq.
For R: Parent 1 is heterozygous (Rr) and parent 2 is homozygous recessive (rr); therefore 1/2 their offspring will be Rr and 1/2 will be rr.
Because the question asks the probability that the offspring is PpQQRr, we can multiply 1/1 * 1/4 * 1/2 = 1/8.
While this question looks complicated it can be broken down into three individual Punnett squares, and the probability of each of the three individual allele genotypes can be multiplied to give the desired answer.
Starting with P: Parent 1 is homozygous dominant (PP) and parent 2 is homozygous recessive (pp), therefore 100% of their offspring will be heterozygous (Pp), or 1/1.
For Q: Both parents are heterozygous (Qq); therefore 1/4 of their offspring will be QQ, 1/2 will be Qq, and 1/4 will be qq.
For R: Parent 1 is heterozygous (Rr) and parent 2 is homozygous recessive (rr); therefore 1/2 their offspring will be Rr and 1/2 will be rr.
Because the question asks the probability that the offspring is PpQQRr, we can multiply 1/1 * 1/4 * 1/2 = 1/8.
The gene for muscular dystrophy is X-linked. A female carrier and an unaffected male have one daughter together. The daughter has a son with an unaffected male. What is the probability that the son will not be affected?
The gene for muscular dystrophy is X-linked. A female carrier and an unaffected male have one daughter together. The daughter has a son with an unaffected male. What is the probability that the son will not be affected?
Tap to see back →
First, we know that muscular dystrophy must be recessive, as the grandmother in the question is a carrier.
Below is the Punnett Square for the grandparents, where the mother is a carrier and father is unaffected. X represents an unaffected allele, while X' represents the allele for dystrophy. The probability their daughter is a carrier is 50%, and the probability she is unaffected is 50%.
If the daughter is a carrier, the Punnett square between her and an unaffected male (the father) would be identical to that of the grandparents. In this case, the chance of the son being affected is 50%.
If the daughter is not a carrier, then her son cannot be affected.
In order for the son to be affected, two events must take place: the daughter must be a carrier (50% chance), and the son must inherit the affected allele (50% chance).
There is a 25% chance that the son will be affected; thus, there is a 75% chance that he will be unaffected.
| | X’ | X | |
| ----- | --- | -- |
| X | X’X | XX |
| Y | X’Y | XY |
First, we know that muscular dystrophy must be recessive, as the grandmother in the question is a carrier.
Below is the Punnett Square for the grandparents, where the mother is a carrier and father is unaffected. X represents an unaffected allele, while X' represents the allele for dystrophy. The probability their daughter is a carrier is 50%, and the probability she is unaffected is 50%.
If the daughter is a carrier, the Punnett square between her and an unaffected male (the father) would be identical to that of the grandparents. In this case, the chance of the son being affected is 50%.
If the daughter is not a carrier, then her son cannot be affected.
In order for the son to be affected, two events must take place: the daughter must be a carrier (50% chance), and the son must inherit the affected allele (50% chance).
There is a 25% chance that the son will be affected; thus, there is a 75% chance that he will be unaffected.
| | X’ | X | | | ----- | --- | -- | | X | X’X | XX | | Y | X’Y | XY |
Consider the pedigree of a recessive trait. Is the trait autosomal or sex-linked?
Consider the pedigree of a recessive trait. Is the trait autosomal or sex-linked?
Tap to see back →
This trait is X-linked, which can be determined by considering individual 4. This individual has a 50% chance of receiving an affected maternal chromosome (she is a carrier) and a 0% chance of receiving an affected paternal chromosome (he is unaffected), and yet he has the defect. We know that the son inherits the Y-chromosome from his father, and a singular X-chromosome from his mother; thus, we can assume he inherits the affected chromosome from his mother. He has no dominant X-chromosome to veil the trail, thus he expresses the trait despite it being recessive. This pattern indicates that the trait resides on the X-chromosome.
This trait is X-linked, which can be determined by considering individual 4. This individual has a 50% chance of receiving an affected maternal chromosome (she is a carrier) and a 0% chance of receiving an affected paternal chromosome (he is unaffected), and yet he has the defect. We know that the son inherits the Y-chromosome from his father, and a singular X-chromosome from his mother; thus, we can assume he inherits the affected chromosome from his mother. He has no dominant X-chromosome to veil the trail, thus he expresses the trait despite it being recessive. This pattern indicates that the trait resides on the X-chromosome.
Consider the pedigree. What is the probability of individual 22 being affected?
Consider the pedigree. What is the probability of individual 22 being affected?
Tap to see back →
Individual 22 is male, and the trait it X-linked recessive. We know he will inherit the Y-chromosome from the unknown father, and a singular X-chromosome from the affected mother. Because the mother is affected, we know she must have two affected X-chromosomes. No matter which chromosome is passed to individual 22, he will inherit the trait.
Individual 22 is male, and the trait it X-linked recessive. We know he will inherit the Y-chromosome from the unknown father, and a singular X-chromosome from the affected mother. Because the mother is affected, we know she must have two affected X-chromosomes. No matter which chromosome is passed to individual 22, he will inherit the trait.
Consider the pedigree. What is the probabilty of individual 18 being affected?
Consider the pedigree. What is the probabilty of individual 18 being affected?
Tap to see back →
We can tell from the pedigree that the trait is X-linked recessive. Individual 18 is female; her mother is a carrier, and her father is affected. She will receive one affected paternal X-chromosome (100%) and has a 50% chance of received an affected maternal copy. The probability of her being affected is given by the calculation.
We can tell from the pedigree that the trait is X-linked recessive. Individual 18 is female; her mother is a carrier, and her father is affected. She will receive one affected paternal X-chromosome (100%) and has a 50% chance of received an affected maternal copy. The probability of her being affected is given by the calculation.
Consider the pedigree. What is the probability of individaul 18 being a carrier?
Consider the pedigree. What is the probability of individaul 18 being a carrier?
Tap to see back →
We can tell from the pedigree that the trait is X-linked recessive. Individual 18 is female; her mother is a carrier, and her father is affected. She will receive one affected paternal X-chromosome (100%) and has a 50% chance of received an affected maternal copy. The probability of her being a carrier is given by the calculation.
We can tell from the pedigree that the trait is X-linked recessive. Individual 18 is female; her mother is a carrier, and her father is affected. She will receive one affected paternal X-chromosome (100%) and has a 50% chance of received an affected maternal copy. The probability of her being a carrier is given by the calculation.
Consider the pedigree. What is the probability of individual 18 being neither affected nor a carrier?
Consider the pedigree. What is the probability of individual 18 being neither affected nor a carrier?
Tap to see back →
We can tell from the pedigree that the trait is X-linked recessive. Individual 18 is female; her mother is a carrier, and her father is affected. She will receive one affected paternal X-chromosome (100%) and has a 50% chance of received an affected maternal copy. Because we know there is a 100% probability of her receiving at least one affected chromosome (from the father), there is a 0% chance that she will be unaffected. She must be either affected or a carrier.
We can tell from the pedigree that the trait is X-linked recessive. Individual 18 is female; her mother is a carrier, and her father is affected. She will receive one affected paternal X-chromosome (100%) and has a 50% chance of received an affected maternal copy. Because we know there is a 100% probability of her receiving at least one affected chromosome (from the father), there is a 0% chance that she will be unaffected. She must be either affected or a carrier.