What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Research Ethics, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for NAPLEX.
Study Research Ethics in NAPLEX with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What ethical principle requires maximizing benefits and minimizing harms in research?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Beneficence. This Belmont Report principle mandates researchers to do no harm and maximize potential benefits while minimizing risks to participants.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 25
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Research Ethics, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for NAPLEX.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Beneficence. This Belmont Report principle mandates researchers to do no harm and maximize potential benefits while minimizing risks to participants.
Answer: Using others' ideas or words without proper attribution. It undermines intellectual honesty by appropriating others' work, violating ethical norms of originality and proper credit in scholarship.
Answer: Harm not greater than daily life or routine exams. Federal regulations define it as risks comparable to everyday activities or standard medical exams, guiding IRB approvals for low-risk studies.
Answer: Confidential: identifiable but protected; anonymous: not identifiable. Confidentiality maintains privacy by protecting identifiable data, while anonymity prevents any linkage to individuals, enhancing ethical safeguards.
Answer: Secondary interest that could bias professional judgment. COIs arise when external influences, like financial ties, could compromise the integrity and objectivity of research decisions.
Answer: Making up data or results and recording/reporting them. It violates research integrity by inventing false information, which can mislead scientific progress and erode public trust in findings.
Answer: Consent provided by a parent or legal guardian. It serves as a substitute for the child's informed consent, ensuring legal and ethical protection when the child cannot fully consent.
Answer: Voluntariness. This element protects autonomy by ensuring decisions are made freely, without pressure or incentives that could unduly influence participation.
Answer: Respect for persons (autonomy). This principle from the Belmont Report emphasizes autonomy by ensuring participants can make informed, voluntary choices without coercion.
Answer: Protect human subjects by reviewing research ethics. IRBs are mandated by federal regulations to evaluate study protocols, ensuring ethical compliance and safeguarding participant rights and welfare.
Answer: The Belmont Report. Published in 1979 by the National Commission, it established the foundational ethical principles for protecting human subjects in research.
Answer: Promptly report to the IRB/sponsor per protocol. Reporting ensures participant safety and regulatory compliance, allowing oversight bodies to assess and mitigate ongoing study risks.
Answer: Affirmative agreement of a child to participate. In pediatric research, assent respects the child's developing autonomy by requiring their agreement in addition to parental permission.
Answer: Ghost authorship. Excluding contributors denies proper recognition and breaches ethical standards like those from ICMJE, compromising transparency in research.
Answer: Compensation must not be so large that it is coercive. Ethical guidelines require payments to reimburse without coercion, preserving voluntariness and preventing undue influence on participation.
Answer: Falsification (selective data reporting). Selective omission manipulates data to misrepresent outcomes, constituting falsification under research misconduct definitions.
Answer: Gift (honorary) authorship. This practice violates authorship guidelines, such as ICMJE criteria, which require substantial contributions for legitimate authorship credit.
Answer: Comprehension (understanding). This element requires that information be presented in a way that matches the participant's capacity to understand risks, benefits, and procedures.
Answer: Disclose the COI and follow the management plan. Disclosure promotes transparency, and a management plan mitigates bias, ensuring research integrity and compliance with ethical standards.
Answer: Voluntary, informed agreement to participate. It upholds respect for persons by providing participants with sufficient information to make an autonomous decision about involvement.
Answer: Justice. This Belmont Report principle ensures fairness in selecting subjects and distributing research burdens and benefits equitably across populations.
Answer: Genuine uncertainty about which intervention is superior. Equipoise justifies randomization ethically by ensuring no known superior treatment exists, balancing beneficence and scientific validity.
Answer: Fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP). U.S. policy, including from the Office of Research Integrity, defines misconduct strictly as these intentional acts that undermine scientific validity.
Answer: Manipulating methods or data so results are misrepresented. This misconduct distorts scientific truth by altering processes or results, leading to inaccurate representations in research reporting.
Answer: Stop study procedures; honor withdrawal per consent terms. Respecting autonomy requires immediate cessation of interventions and adherence to withdrawal protocols to protect participant rights.