Log inSign up
PSAT Reading and Writing · Question of the Day

PSAT Reading and Writing Question of the Day

A fresh daily question to build accuracy, reinforce recall, and turn practice into a steady habit.
Friday, November 6, 2026

Text 1
Electric vehicles (EVs) are sometimes criticized because battery production emits greenhouse gases, but focusing on manufacturing alone misses the full lifecycle. In regions where electricity is moderately clean, an EV's higher upfront emissions are typically offset after a few years of driving, and the gap widens as grids add renewables. Moreover, EVs reduce local air pollution, which has immediate health benefits in dense neighborhoods. Policies should prioritize faster charging networks to accelerate adoption.
Text 2
Lifecycle comparisons depend heavily on where and how vehicles are used. In places with coal-dominant grids, an EV can take much longer to "break even," and heavy vehicles with large batteries may never outperform efficient hybrids. Local air benefits also vary: if power plants are near disadvantaged communities, shifting emissions upstream can concentrate harms elsewhere. EVs can be part of a solution, but policy should pair adoption incentives with grid decarbonization and vehicle-size standards, not treat charging infrastructure as the main lever.

Which choice best captures how Text 2 would most likely respond to Text 1's policy recommendation?

Keep practicing PSAT Reading and Writing

Question of the Day

Answer today's PSAT Reading and Writing question, reveal the full explanation, then keep the streak going with a new question every day.

Text 1
Electric vehicles (EVs) are sometimes criticized because battery production emits greenhouse gases, but focusing on manufacturing alone misses the full lifecycle. In regions where electricity is moderately clean, an EV's higher upfront emissions are typically offset after a few years of driving, and the gap widens as grids add renewables. Moreover, EVs reduce local air pollution, which has immediate health benefits in dense neighborhoods. Policies should prioritize faster charging networks to accelerate adoption.
Text 2
Lifecycle comparisons depend heavily on where and how vehicles are used. In places with coal-dominant grids, an EV can take much longer to "break even," and heavy vehicles with large batteries may never outperform efficient hybrids. Local air benefits also vary: if power plants are near disadvantaged communities, shifting emissions upstream can concentrate harms elsewhere. EVs can be part of a solution, but policy should pair adoption incentives with grid decarbonization and vehicle-size standards, not treat charging infrastructure as the main lever.

Which choice best captures how Text 2 would most likely respond to Text 1's policy recommendation?

  1. Text 2 would argue that charging networks are irrelevant because EVs are always worse than hybrids.
  2. Text 2 would fully endorse the recommendation, adding that manufacturing emissions are negligible in all regions.
  3. Text 2 would qualify the recommendation by arguing that charging access matters but is insufficient without cleaner grids and limits on battery-heavy vehicle designs. (correct answer)
  4. Text 2 would shift focus away from emissions entirely and argue that EV policy should be based only on consumer preference.

Explanation: The question asks how Text 2 would respond to Text 1's policy recommendation to 'prioritize faster charging networks.' Text 1 advocates for charging infrastructure as the main policy lever for EV adoption. Text 2 takes a more nuanced view, arguing that 'policy should pair adoption incentives with grid decarbonization and vehicle-size standards, not treat charging infrastructure as the main lever.' Text 2 acknowledges charging matters but emphasizes it's insufficient without addressing grid cleanliness (since EVs in coal-heavy grids may not outperform hybrids) and vehicle size (large batteries may never break even). Answer C correctly captures this qualification: Text 2 would qualify the recommendation by arguing that charging access matters but is insufficient without cleaner grids and limits on battery-heavy vehicle designs. Choice A wrongly suggests Text 2 thinks EVs are always worse. Choice B incorrectly shows full endorsement. Choice D misrepresents Text 2's continued focus on emissions.