- Sign In
- Tutor Bios
-
Test Prep
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Search 50+ Tests
Loading Page
-
Academic Tutoring
elementary tutoring
Search 350+ Subjects
Loading Page
- About
Create an account to track your scores
and create your own practice tests:
All New SAT Reading Resources
The passage is adapted from Carter G, Leffer L (2015) “Social Grooming in Bats: Are Vampire Bats Exceptional?” © 2015 Carter, Leffer
Long-term cooperative relationships are most evident in primates, but evidence for similar social relationships has been accumulating for several other social vertebrate groups including cetaceans, bats, elephants, hyenas and ravens. The functional importance of these complex social relationships across different species may have led to similar cognitive or behavioral mechanisms for manipulating social bonds. A prime example of such a mechanism is social grooming—the cleaning of the body by a partner. Experimental and observational studies show that primate social grooming can be ‘exchanged’ for multiple social benefits, including reciprocal grooming, social tolerance, access to food, and agonistic support. Individuals can spend up to 20% of their time grooming others, and the behavior provides proximate physiological rewards for both givers and receivers. Although most of what is known about social grooming comes from studies of primates, evidence for a role of social grooming in maintaining social ties is emerging from several other mammals (marsupials, deer, cows, horses, voles, mice, meerkats, coati, lions) and group-living birds.
In bats, adult social grooming is female-biased in species with female philopatry and has been most studied in the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus). Kerth et al. compared social grooming rates of vampire bats with the temperate and insectivorous Bechstein’s bat (Myotis bechsteinii). These two species both have long lifespans and demonstrate fission-fusion social dynamics, where individuals maintain long-term social associations while moving between several roost trees. In both species, social grooming rates among individuals were not predicted by self-grooming or numbers of parasites. Bechstein’s bats spent more time grooming themselves (38% of their time in roosts) compared with vampires (23% of their roosting time), but wild vampire bats spent about 5% of their roosting time grooming others, which is 2–4 times higher than Bechstein’s bats.
Patterns of social grooming among categories of individuals also differed between the two species. In the Bechstein’s bat, adult female social grooming was not detectably symmetrical, and was predicted by kinship, occurring mostly between adult mothers and daughters, sometimes between sisters, and only rarely between non-kin. In vampires, female social grooming was highly symmetrical and relatively common among non-kin, where it correlated with co-roosting association and food sharing.
It is not entirely clear if vampire bat social grooming is typical or exceptional when compared to other bats or non-primate mammals. One hypothesis is that social grooming in vampire bats is exceptional in quantity and quality, because it is related to their uniquely cooperative food sharing behavior. Like many primates, reciprocal patterns of vampire bat food sharing and social grooming extend beyond mother-offspring bonds, suggesting they may provide both direct and indirect fitness benefits. Among bats, the common vampire has an extraordinarily large brain and neocortex for its body size. In primates, increased neocortex size has been linked to higher metrics of social complexity, such as social grooming network size and strategic deception.
Alternatively, the apparent distinctiveness of vampire bat social grooming might stem from purely ecological factors. Social grooming may be more obvious in vampire bats due to higher levels of ectoparasite infestation. Bat fly density has been linked to species-level grooming rates and the two vampire species that were observed ranked 5th and 6th place out of 53 neotropical bats for average number of parasitic streblid flies per bat. A sampling bias could also over-emphasize social grooming in vampire bats, because there is much effort focused on studying vampire bat social behavior and a lack of data on social grooming in other bats.
Comparing social grooming data across studies can be difficult due to study differences in ectoparasite density, temperature, sampling method, visibility, and level of human disturbance. Still, there are important conclusions that can be made regarding social grooming among vampire bats from the studies that have been conducted. With even better studies in the future – for instance, ones that compare groups of adult bats that have fixed levels of social association (stable group composition) and no insect ectoparasites – we will get a clearer picture of social grooming among vampire bats and its significance.
If the first paragraph of the passage were removed, the passage would lose
the author’s stated opinion on the importance of social grooming and cooperative relationships
a reliable definition of the term “social grooming” and its context in cooperative relationships
a conclusive explanation for the unique interactions of vampire bats
the results of a study conducted to determine the differences between various types of bats
The passage is adapted from Carter G, Leffer L (2015) “Social Grooming in Bats: Are Vampire Bats Exceptional?” © 2015 Carter, Leffer
Long-term cooperative relationships are most evident in primates, but evidence for similar social relationships has been accumulating for several other social vertebrate groups including cetaceans, bats, elephants, hyenas and ravens. The functional importance of these complex social relationships across different species may have led to similar cognitive or behavioral mechanisms for manipulating social bonds. A prime example of such a mechanism is social grooming—the cleaning of the body by a partner. Experimental and observational studies show that primate social grooming can be ‘exchanged’ for multiple social benefits, including reciprocal grooming, social tolerance, access to food, and agonistic support. Individuals can spend up to 20% of their time grooming others, and the behavior provides proximate physiological rewards for both givers and receivers. Although most of what is known about social grooming comes from studies of primates, evidence for a role of social grooming in maintaining social ties is emerging from several other mammals (marsupials, deer, cows, horses, voles, mice, meerkats, coati, lions) and group-living birds.
In bats, adult social grooming is female-biased in species with female philopatry and has been most studied in the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus). Kerth et al. compared social grooming rates of vampire bats with the temperate and insectivorous Bechstein’s bat (Myotis bechsteinii). These two species both have long lifespans and demonstrate fission-fusion social dynamics, where individuals maintain long-term social associations while moving between several roost trees. In both species, social grooming rates among individuals were not predicted by self-grooming or numbers of parasites. Bechstein’s bats spent more time grooming themselves (38% of their time in roosts) compared with vampires (23% of their roosting time), but wild vampire bats spent about 5% of their roosting time grooming others, which is 2–4 times higher than Bechstein’s bats.
Patterns of social grooming among categories of individuals also differed between the two species. In the Bechstein’s bat, adult female social grooming was not detectably symmetrical, and was predicted by kinship, occurring mostly between adult mothers and daughters, sometimes between sisters, and only rarely between non-kin. In vampires, female social grooming was highly symmetrical and relatively common among non-kin, where it correlated with co-roosting association and food sharing.
It is not entirely clear if vampire bat social grooming is typical or exceptional when compared to other bats or non-primate mammals. One hypothesis is that social grooming in vampire bats is exceptional in quantity and quality, because it is related to their uniquely cooperative food sharing behavior. Like many primates, reciprocal patterns of vampire bat food sharing and social grooming extend beyond mother-offspring bonds, suggesting they may provide both direct and indirect fitness benefits. Among bats, the common vampire has an extraordinarily large brain and neocortex for its body size. In primates, increased neocortex size has been linked to higher metrics of social complexity, such as social grooming network size and strategic deception.
Alternatively, the apparent distinctiveness of vampire bat social grooming might stem from purely ecological factors. Social grooming may be more obvious in vampire bats due to higher levels of ectoparasite infestation. Bat fly density has been linked to species-level grooming rates and the two vampire species that were observed ranked 5th and 6th place out of 53 neotropical bats for average number of parasitic streblid flies per bat. A sampling bias could also over-emphasize social grooming in vampire bats, because there is much effort focused on studying vampire bat social behavior and a lack of data on social grooming in other bats.
Comparing social grooming data across studies can be difficult due to study differences in ectoparasite density, temperature, sampling method, visibility, and level of human disturbance. Still, there are important conclusions that can be made regarding social grooming among vampire bats from the studies that have been conducted. With even better studies in the future – for instance, ones that compare groups of adult bats that have fixed levels of social association (stable group composition) and no insect ectoparasites – we will get a clearer picture of social grooming among vampire bats and its significance.
If the first paragraph of the passage were removed, the passage would lose
the author’s stated opinion on the importance of social grooming and cooperative relationships
a conclusive explanation for the unique interactions of vampire bats
the results of a study conducted to determine the differences between various types of bats
a reliable definition of the term “social grooming” and its context in cooperative relationships
In this passage, the initial paragraph serves to introduce the topic of social grooming and its context within cooperative relationships. So, if the paragraph were removed, the passage would lose these components. Thus, our correct answer is “a reliable definition of the term “social grooming” and its context in cooperative relationships.” While studies are mentioned elsewhere in the passage, they are not addressed in the first paragraph. The passage, and in particular the first paragraph, also do not claim to have a conclusive explanation for the unique interactions of vampire bats. In fact, the passage is far more explanatory in nature than persuasive/opinionated.
Phosphorus is a key component for life on Earth; it performs essential roles in respiration, photosynthesis, and the decomposition of organic material. Phosphorus is primarily acquired by plants in the inorganic, ionic forms, which are found in soil solutions at concentrations of only a few parts per million. Plants use methods of diffusion and active transport to absorb phosphorus at the surface of their roots.
Phosphorus is abundant in soils; however, it is often unavailable to plants because it forms insoluble complexes with positively charged cations. This occurs when negatively charged phosphorus ions bind to positive cations in the soil (i.e. opposites attract). Enzymes such as acid phosphatases play a critical role in the acquisition and manipulation of phosphorus in plants. It has been found that when soils possess low levels of free phosphorus, plants are stimulated to produce acid phosphatase enzymes, which release inorganic phosphorus in the soil.
Plants need nutrients such as phosphorus to grow and proliferate; therefore, understanding how this species uses phosphorus could lead to conservation practices to limits this invasive species’ impact on the environment. A group of scientists wanted to investigate the relationship between plant enzyme activity and phosphorus levels in aquatic biomes. This investigation was targeted at studying the invasive Eurasian milfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum. In doing so, scientists believed that they could control the spread of the plant into neighboring waters if they were able to limit the nutrients in its environment. A study was performed in order to explore how phosphorus concentration in freshwater ecosystems affects phosphorus cycling and plant enzyme production. In order to determine if there was a relationship between the phosphatase activity and concentration of phosphorus in the sediment and water column of specific sites, researchers measured the respective phosphorus concentrations and enzyme activities.
In this study, three standing ponds were sampled at six different time periods in the same year from July to December. The phosphorus content of each sample was determined through an ascorbic acid assay. Sediment collections were divided into samples weighing one sixteenth of a gram using coning and quartering techniques. These samples underwent a persulfate digestion and were vacuum filtered to remove excess sediment. Last, the samples were diluted and analyzed for phosphorus content using the ascorbic acid procedure. The solutions’ ability to absorb specific wavelengths of light was measured using a spectrophotometer set at an absorbance of 880 nanometers. After the sediment phosphorus content of each site was determined, scientists decided to determine the concentration of phosphorus releasing enzymes through an alkaline phosphatase assay. One to two milliliters of collected sediment was centrifuged until the sediment formed a pellet. The scientists chemically induced and observed a reaction between the sediment enzymes and insoluble phosphorus compounds present in an artificial substrate. Enzymes speed up chemical reactions by binding to substrates and releasing their constituent parts: in this case phosphorus and an unknown cation. After this reaction was halted, the samples were centrifuged and their absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer set at 420 nanometers. This identified the concentration of phosphatase enzymes present in each sample. Now, scientists were able to compare the correlation between phosphorus levels and plant enzymes in the soil.
An exponential regression analysis indicated that there was a significant relationship between phosphatase activity and sediment phosphorus concentration (see Figure 1). The trend in the exponential regression analysis showed evidence of an inducible expression between phosphorus substrate and phosphatase enzymes. In other words, phosphorus is often abundant in soils, but is unavailable due to its formation into insoluble complexes with aluminum and iron. As a result, acid phosphatase enzymes break down these insoluble complexes and release phosphorus for plant acquisition and usage; therefore, phosphorus rich environments should possess greater phosphatase activity.
This study supported the expectation that there would be a relationship between phosphatase activities and sediment phosphorus concentration (i.e. higher phosphorus concentrations increase yields of plants, while phosphorus limitation decreases the productivity of invasive species). The scientists hoped to use the findings in this study for the development of bioremediation techniques aimed at controlling invasive species through green management practices.
Figure 1 represents a correlation between phosphorus concentration and phosphatase activity in all the sites across all time periods.
Which of the following identifies the shift in focus of the passage from its beginning to its end?
The focus shifts from experimentation to application of scientific knowledge
The focus shifts from studying phosphorus concentrations to phosphatase enzymes
The focus shifts from investigating pollution in rural area to bioremediation in cities
The focus shifts from the study of Eurasian milfoils to the study of agricultural crops
The focus shifts from plants to invasive species
Which of the following identifies the shift in focus of the passage from its beginning to its end?
The focus shifts from studying phosphorus concentrations to phosphatase enzymes
The focus shifts from investigating pollution in rural area to bioremediation in cities
The focus shifts from the study of Eurasian milfoils to the study of agricultural crops
The focus shifts from plants to invasive species
The focus shifts from experimentation to application of scientific knowledge
The focus of this passage follows the scientific method. In the first two paragraphs, general knowledge about a particular phenomenon was discussed. In paragraphs three and four, the scientists' experiment was discussed, while their analysis was covered in the fifth paragraph. Last, the conclusion and applicability of their results were discussed in the final paragraph. The focus shifts from experimentation to applicability of the study's results; therefore, "the focus shifts from experimentation to application of scientific knowledge" is the correct choice.
Report an issue with this question
If you've found an issue with this question, please let us know. With the help of the community we can continue to improve our educational resources.
DMCA Complaint
If you believe that content available by means of the Website (as defined in our Terms of Service) infringes one or more of your copyrights, please notify us by providing a written notice (“Infringement Notice”) containing the information described below to the designated agent listed below. If Varsity Tutors takes action in response to an Infringement Notice, it will make a good faith attempt to contact the party that made such content available by means of the most recent email address, if any, provided by such party to Varsity Tutors.
Your Infringement Notice may be forwarded to the party that made the content available or to third parties such as ChillingEffects.org.
Please be advised that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys’ fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Thus, if you are not sure content located on or linked-to by the Website infringes your copyright, you should consider first contacting an attorney.
Please follow these steps to file a notice:
You must include the following:
A physical or electronic signature of the copyright owner or a person authorized to act on their behalf; An identification of the copyright claimed to have been infringed; A description of the nature and exact location of the content that you claim to infringe your copyright, in \ sufficient detail to permit Varsity Tutors to find and positively identify that content; for example we require a link to the specific question (not just the name of the question) that contains the content and a description of which specific portion of the question – an image, a link, the text, etc – your complaint refers to; Your name, address, telephone number and email address; and A statement by you: (a) that you believe in good faith that the use of the content that you claim to infringe your copyright is not authorized by law, or by the copyright owner or such owner’s agent; (b) that all of the information contained in your Infringement Notice is accurate, and (c) under penalty of perjury, that you are either the copyright owner or a person authorized to act on their behalf.
Send your complaint to our designated agent at:
Charles Cohn
Varsity Tutors LLC
101 S. Hanley Rd, Suite 300
St. Louis, MO 63105
Or fill out the form below:
Certified Tutor