We are open Saturday and Sunday!

Call Now to Set Up Tutoring:

(888) 888-0446

Create an account to track your scores
and create your own practice tests:

Create an Account Create a Practice Test

All New SAT Reading Resources

3 Diagnostic Tests 34 Practice Tests Question of the Day Flashcards Learn by Concept

Want to review New SAT Reading but don’t feel like sitting for a whole test at the moment? Varsity Tutors has you covered with thousands of different New SAT Reading flashcards! Our New SAT Reading flashcards allow you to practice with as few or as many questions as you like. Get some studying in now with our numerous New SAT Reading flashcards.

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

The chart below maps how scientists view others' work (left) and how they suspect others will view their own work (right) if the researcher (the scientist or another, depending on the focus) admitted to engaging in questionable research practices.

Screen shot 2020 08 26 at 9.36.40 am

Adapted from Fetterman & Sassenberg, "The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists." December 9, 2015, PLOS One.

According to the graph, when the focus of the question was on their own actions, scientists

incorrectly assumed that admitting that a study was wrong would lead others to be more suspicious of their work.

correctly assumed that admitting that a study was wrong would not lead to an increase in suspicion of their work.

were less likely to admit that a study was wrong if they were more suspicious of other work.

were more likely to admit that a study was wrong if they were more suspicious of other work.

Report an Error Copyright Notice

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

According to the graph, when the focus of the question was on their own actions, scientists

Your answer:

correctly assumed that admitting that a study was wrong would not lead to an increase in suspicion of their work.

Your answer:

were less likely to admit that a study was wrong if they were more suspicious of other work.

Your answer:

were more likely to admit that a study was wrong if they were more suspicious of other work.

Correct answer:

incorrectly assumed that admitting that a study was wrong would lead others to be more suspicious of their work.

Explanation:

The key to any graph-based question is to make sure to look not just at the graph itself, but also at any additional information that is presented with the graph. In this case, you are told that the bars on the left represent how the scientists would view others' future work if the other person admitted to wrongdoing. Notice that if the other person admitted that they had been wrong that the people surveyed would be less likely to suspect them than if they didn't admit to wrongdoing. In contrast, the bars on the right show how they would anticipate others to react if they admitted to wrongdoing. In this case, they said that others would be more suspicious of their work if they did admit to wrongdoing than if they didn't. The answer that matches this is "incorrectly assumed that admitting that a study was wrong would lead others to be more suspicious of their work". While they assumed that others would be more suspicious of their work if they admitted to wrongdoing, scientists, in general, were less suspicious of individuals who admitted to wrongdoing.

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Screen shot 2020 08 20 at 3.28.58 pm

Adapted from Fetterman & Sassenberg, "The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists." December 9, 2015, PLOS One.

Which of the following is best supported by the graph?

Scientists were much more likely to view others as honest if they admitted to wrongness.

Scientists were slightly less likely to view others as honest if they did not admit to wrongness.

Scientists were slightly more likely to view others as honest if they did admit to wrongness.

Scientists believed that others would view them as much less honest if they admitted to wrongness.

Report an Error Copyright Notice

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Which of the following is best supported by the graph?

Your answer:

Scientists were much more likely to view others as honest if they admitted to wrongness.

Your answer:

Scientists were slightly less likely to view others as honest if they did not admit to wrongness.

Your answer:

Scientists were slightly more likely to view others as honest if they did admit to wrongness.

Correct answer:

Scientists believed that others would view them as much less honest if they admitted to wrongness.

Explanation:

Scientists viewed others who admitted to wrongdoing with less suspicion than they viewed people who did not admit to wrongdoing. However, scientists believed that others would view them as less trustworthy if they admitted to wrongdoing. This matches "scientists believed that others would view them as much less honest if they admitted to wrongness."

The other choices can all be eliminated because they make the claim that there is some sort of relationship that can be drawn between scientists in one group and the other. Because you don't have scientist- by-scientist data, however, you can't make any conclusions linking individual scientists in each survey group.

DMCA Complaint

If you believe that content available by means of the Website (as defined in our Terms of Service) infringes one or more of your copyrights, please notify us by providing a written notice (“Infringement Notice”) containing the information described below to the designated agent listed below. If Varsity Tutors takes action in response to an Infringement Notice, it will make a good faith attempt to contact the party that made such content available by means of the most recent email address, if any, provided by such party to Varsity Tutors.

Your Infringement Notice may be forwarded to the party that made the content available or to third parties such as ChillingEffects.org.

Please be advised that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys’ fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Thus, if you are not sure content located on or linked-to by the Website infringes your copyright, you should consider first contacting an attorney.

Please follow these steps to file a notice:

You must include the following:

A physical or electronic signature of the copyright owner or a person authorized to act on their behalf; An identification of the copyright claimed to have been infringed; A description of the nature and exact location of the content that you claim to infringe your copyright, in \ sufficient detail to permit Varsity Tutors to find and positively identify that content; for example we require a link to the specific question (not just the name of the question) that contains the content and a description of which specific portion of the question – an image, a link, the text, etc – your complaint refers to; Your name, address, telephone number and email address; and A statement by you: (a) that you believe in good faith that the use of the content that you claim to infringe your copyright is not authorized by law, or by the copyright owner or such owner’s agent; (b) that all of the information contained in your Infringement Notice is accurate, and (c) under penalty of perjury, that you are either the copyright owner or a person authorized to act on their behalf.

Send your complaint to our designated agent at:

Charles Cohn Varsity Tutors LLC
101 S. Hanley Rd, Suite 300
St. Louis, MO 63105

Or fill out the form below:

Do not fill in this field

Contact Information

* Full legal name

Company name

* Phone number

* Email address

Address

* Address1

Address2

* City

* State

* Zipcode

* Country

Complaint Details

* URL of copyrighted work (where your original material is located)

* Please describe the copyrighted work so that it may be easily identified

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

I have a good faith belief that the use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

This notification is accurate.

I acknowledge that there may be adverse legal consequences for making false or bad faith allegations of copyright infringement by using this process.

* Signature (your digital signature is legally binding)

View SAT Reading Tutors

Martine
Certified Tutor

University of South Florida-Main Campus, Bachelors, Science. Windsor University School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine, Scien...

View SAT Reading Tutors

Mohammed
Certified Tutor

University of Maryland-College Park, Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering. University of Maryland-College Park, Master...

View SAT Reading Tutors

Michele
Certified Tutor

Wesleyan University, Bachelor in Arts, General Literature. Cornell University, Doctor of Philosophy, Organizational Behavior ...

Popular Subjects

Spanish Tutors in Philadelphia, Algebra Tutors in Miami, Calculus Tutors in Los Angeles, Chemistry Tutors in Phoenix, English Tutors in Dallas Fort Worth, Reading Tutors in Chicago, French Tutors in San Diego, Spanish Tutors in Phoenix, Computer Science Tutors in Houston, French Tutors in Philadelphia

Popular Courses & Classes

Spanish Courses & Classes in Los Angeles, GRE Courses & Classes in Houston, LSAT Courses & Classes in Boston, LSAT Courses & Classes in Washington DC, SAT Courses & Classes in Washington DC, SSAT Courses & Classes in Philadelphia, Spanish Courses & Classes in Dallas Fort Worth, LSAT Courses & Classes in San Diego, ACT Courses & Classes in Washington DC, MCAT Courses & Classes in Washington DC

Popular Test Prep

ACT Test Prep in Washington DC, MCAT Test Prep in Dallas Fort Worth, SSAT Test Prep in Houston, ACT Test Prep in San Francisco-Bay Area, SAT Test Prep in Phoenix, SSAT Test Prep in Philadelphia, SSAT Test Prep in Denver, GMAT Test Prep in Houston, LSAT Test Prep in Los Angeles, LSAT Test Prep in Washington DC

HIGH SCHOOL

GRADUATE SCHOOL

K-8

Search 50+ Tests

math tutoring

science tutoring

foreign languages

elementary tutoring

other

Search 350+ Subjects

Create an account to track your scores
and create your own practice tests:

All New SAT Reading Resources

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Report an issue with this question

DMCA Complaint

Contact Information

Address

Complaint Details

Email address:
Your name:
Feedback:

HIGH SCHOOL

GRADUATE SCHOOL

K-8

Search 50+ Tests

math tutoring

science tutoring

foreign languages

elementary tutoring

other

Search 350+ Subjects

Create an account to track your scores and create your own practice tests:

All New SAT Reading Resources

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Flashcards: Interpreting Graphs

Report an issue with this question

DMCA Complaint

Contact Information

Address

Complaint Details

Create an account to track your scores
and create your own practice tests: