What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Evidence In Text, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for PSAT Reading and Writing.
Study Evidence In Text in PSAT Reading and Writing with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which kind of evidence best supports a main idea claim?
Tap card or press Space to flip
A central statement or repeated key point, not a minor example. Main ideas appear prominently, not buried in supporting details.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 35
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Evidence In Text, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for PSAT Reading and Writing.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: A central statement or repeated key point, not a minor example. Main ideas appear prominently, not buried in supporting details.
Answer: Claim = conclusion; evidence = text details that support the conclusion. Claims assert what's true; evidence provides the proof from the text.
Answer: A key reason that directly supports the claim. Supporting reasons directly prove the argument's validity.
Answer: The support is inferred by combining details the text provides. Implicit requires reading between the lines to understand the meaning.
Answer: A: "Rules protect consumers.". Positive statement about rules shows author's supportive stance.
Answer: Details showing what the author is trying to do (inform, persuade, critique). Focus on rhetorical strategies and language that reveals intent.
Answer: Answer the claim question first, then match evidence. Understanding the claim helps identify which evidence supports it.
Answer: A line that links the cause to the effect using clear reasoning or cues. Look for transition words like "because" or "resulted in" that show causation.
Answer: A: "However, the mood darkened.". "However" signals contrast; "darkened" shows the negative shift.
Answer: A precise quoted detail that directly supports the claim. Specific quotes provide stronger proof than general paraphrasing.
Answer: Choosing a true detail that is relevant but does not prove the claim. Watch for details that are true but don't actually support the specific claim.
Answer: Diction and connotation that consistently signal the attitude. Word choice reveals emotional attitude through positive/negative connotations.
Answer: The text states the support directly, not by implication. Explicit means clearly stated in the text without needing interpretation.
Answer: Implied detail that logically supports the inference. Inferences require evidence that suggests rather than states directly.
Answer: Restate the question as a specific claim that must be supported. Converting the question to a claim clarifies what evidence to seek.
Answer: The author's emphasis (what is highlighted and why). Authors emphasize what matters most to their purpose.
Answer: C) "Therefore...". "Therefore" signals a logical conclusion drawn from previous points.
Answer: A: "Because it rained all night…". "Because" explicitly establishes the causal relationship.
Answer: Evidence A: "I wonder if…". "I wonder" directly expresses uncertainty; "I know" shows certainty.
Answer: C) "troubling". "Troubling" has negative connotations indicating concern or worry.
Answer: A) "researchers found". "Researchers found" indicates empirical evidence, not speculation.
Answer: Claim = conclusion; evidence = text details proving it. Claims are what you argue; evidence is the proof from the text.
Answer: A) "Unlike A, B...". "Unlike" explicitly signals a comparison between two things.
Answer: A verifiable fact, example, statistic, or described event from the text. Evidence must be objective and observable, not subjective interpretation.
Answer: A repeated pattern across multiple parts of the text. Patterns show consistency, making them stronger than single instances.
Answer: The most directly relevant, specific, and explicit support in the text. Look for quotes that directly address the claim without requiring interpretation.
Answer: B) "immediately". "Immediately" conveys time pressure and need for quick action.
Answer: Local context clues near the word or phrase. Surrounding words reveal meaning through usage, not definitions.
Answer: B: "To their surprise…". "To their surprise" explicitly states the unexpected result.
Answer: B) "perhaps". "Perhaps" expresses possibility, showing the speaker lacks certainty.
Answer: B: "Method 1 was faster than Method 2.". Direct comparison statement provides specific evidence of difference.
Answer: An explicit causal cue (because, therefore, led to). Causal words explicitly show cause-effect relationships.
Answer: The choice that most directly supports the claim. Direct support trumps tangential truth every time.
Answer: C) multiple consistent observations. Patterns require multiple data points, not isolated examples.
Answer: C) "in most cases". "In most cases" limits the scope, showing the author avoids absolutes.